Thread: Pac vs. Prince

-rrbong - "THE GREAT NASEEM HAMED" is so good he retires young at age 26... too brave and too great of him.

Hahahahaha!!!
Barrera had a game plan against NAZ and no game plan against PAC. PAC fights without any game plan. RIGHT!!!!!!
Sure NAZ can beat and KO PAC.
but PAC can beat and KO NAZ too.
But PAC is a better fighter of the 2 because he beat BARRERA! IDIOT.
well we will never know if NAZ don't fight again. he is still young to comeback at 32.

THE GREAT NAZ is better... oh yeah!!! retired because of old age.
if his not retired, well he didnt fight since 2002... retired to me.

Originally Posted by KOMAN

-rrbong - "THE GREAT NASEEM HAMED" is so good he retires young at age 26... too brave and too great of him.

Hahahahaha!!!
Barrera had a game plan against NAZ and no game plan against PAC. PAC fights without any game plan. RIGHT!!!!!!
Sure NAZ can beat and KO PAC.
but PAC can beat and KO NAZ too.
But PAC is a better fighter of the 2 because he beat BARRERA! IDIOT.
well we will never know if NAZ don't fight again. he is still young to comeback at 32.

THE GREAT NAZ is better... oh yeah!!! retired because of old age.
if his not retired, well he didnt fight since 2002... retired to me.

Fighter A beating fighter B so it means he can beat fighter C who lost to fighter B really doesn't work because not everyone has the same style.

it was broken down to where you could say Pacquiao could beat Ali

Jesus you really know your Boxing, I am impressed with your knowledge of the game. You sound like an expert to me.I wish I had your insight of Boxing

Originally Posted by KOMAN

-rrbong - "THE GREAT NASEEM HAMED" is so good he retires young at age 26... too brave and too great of him.

Hahahahaha!!!
Barrera had a game plan against NAZ and no game plan against PAC. PAC fights without any game plan. RIGHT!!!!!!
Sure NAZ can beat and KO PAC.
but PAC can beat and KO NAZ too.
But PAC is a better fighter of the 2 because he beat BARRERA! IDIOT.
well we will never know if NAZ don't fight again. he is still young to comeback at 32.

THE GREAT NAZ is better... oh yeah!!! retired because of old age.
if his not retired, well he didnt fight since 2002...  retired to me.

yes exactly thats stupid because foreman beat fraizer fraizer beat ali and ali beat foreman and another example is mccall beat lewis  frank bruno beat mccall and lewis beat bruno as starr said doesnt matter if fighter A beats fighter B doesnt mean fighter C cant beat fighter A does it ?? im not saying naz would win i think pac would win but im just saying u cant do what ur doing in boxing because style makes fights

Originally Posted by Scrap

Interesting fight this both on their best day Id just side with Naz. Naz use to eat southpaws for breakfast. Morales is4 years past his best Barrera 6 years, while they were fighting each other it was entertaining watching 2 old warhorses having it. But as they say time and tide waits for no man, stay away from the young hungry guns, unless the moneys good

eat southpaws for breakfast u mean like when he was down 3 times against kevin kelley

Ice he was on the wain by then at about 22 he was awsome. You can say what you want about the Naz Ingle Partnership but it worked

Originally Posted by Scrap

Ice he was on the wain by then at about 22 he was awsome. You can say what you want about the Naz Ingle Partnership but it worked

oh yea i do respect naz but i never liked his style keep leaving his hands down didnt like style at all

it was hard for me to write this thread cause I did not want to take away from Pac who I think is a great boxer and a good guy. Deserves so much credit and is the most exciting boxer right now.


but the question was asked and again, for me it goes back to defense. Pac does not have good defense, his defense is his amazing offense. He gets hit and he hits back with three. So I ask myself, Prince in his prime had a good defense and was one of the hardest punchers. He hit you and you were KO'd. I remember what he did to Sanchez.....anyway, Pac is easily hit and I would have to conjecture that if he tried to hit Naz, Naz would avoid the shots and then Naz would land his shots and hurt Pac bad.

another thing...Naz would have to win within 6-7 rounds. After that I think Pac's tenacity would drain Naz and a victory by points would favor Pac.

Who are you?

who me?

No the other guy.

I hate it when Canadians get in the way.

Mad Dog, good points, one thing though. My family run Canada so , you dont

Originally Posted by the_answer

Originally Posted by HighGrade

From sat. Performance its hard to imagine prince even in his prime being able to compete with pac. Pac was sooo fast n strong that I think naz wouldn't have been able to handle. By the way I noticed pac has some huge legs n prince did too. Maybe that's where they get there power from. Who's got bigger legs?

pac is not invincible
but he is almost if hes 101% focused
i cant believe hed ever KO morales that fast
especially in rnd2 when he knocked him down
i mean, theyre were both fresh and its too early
i thought EMs knockdowns in the 2nd fight were due
to all the punishment he got from the very first round
and it eventually took its toll in the latter rounds
but erik down in the 2nd?!? thats awesome power for pac

P.S.
btw, power is inborn
you cant train for it
cuz if you can, every boxer in the world
will posses that 1 punch KOing power

Not saying power is trained or born but that argument is flawed. Skill is definitely trained but not everyone in the world ends up looking like JMM of PBF.

Pac has bad balance but Naz has worser balance. Pac would chase him and Naz would be going backwards sideway falling all over the place. Everytime MAB chased him thats what happened. Pac has the reach, speed to KO Naz.

Very, very difficult to see Pac beating Hamed.