Thread: Pac vs. Prince

From sat. Performance its hard to imagine prince even in his prime being able to compete with pac. Pac was sooo fast n strong that I think naz wouldn't have been able to handle. By the way I noticed pac has some huge legs n prince did too. Maybe that's where they get there power from. Who's got bigger legs?

Hers are massive

And no way in hell Nas could beat Pac.

Originally Posted by HighGrade

From sat. Performance its hard to imagine prince even in his prime being able to compete with pac. Pac was sooo fast n strong that I think naz wouldn't have been able to handle. By the way I noticed pac has some huge legs n prince did too. Maybe that's where they get there power from. Who's got bigger legs?

pac is not invincible
but he is almost if hes 101% focused
i cant believe hed ever KO morales that fast
especially in rnd2 when he knocked him down
i mean, theyre were both fresh and its too early
i thought EMs knockdowns in the 2nd fight were due
to all the punishment he got from the very first round
and it eventually took its toll in the latter rounds
but erik down in the 2nd?!? thats awesome power for pac

P.S.
btw, power is inborn
you cant train for it
cuz if you can, every boxer in the world
will posses that 1 punch KOing power

Prince in his prime was defensively savvy and a natural counter puncher and power to boot. The way Pacquiao runs into counter uppercuts when he lunges would give him nightmares against Hamed i think

Originally Posted by P.G.H Angel Eyes

Prince in his prime was defensively savvy and a natural counter puncher and power to boot. The way Pacquiao runs into counter uppercuts when he lunges would give him nightmares against Hamed i think

pac in his prime (currently or maybe on his way)
has got a great chin and awesome power
proof? he KOed the person with arguably the most respected chin in
boxing and man naz is always open
pac is a lot faster than him so even if you say hes a natural counter puncher
hed be hit and will hit the canvass right before he knew it
and you need defense against pacman
say D - E - F - E - N - S - E
defense man.. defense

Here is by two cents worth...

Pac can be hit easily. His forte is his strength and his speed not his defense. Prince in his prime was not that easy to hit. Also both have great chins. However, the difference was when Prince hit you flush you would stay down. Prince a much more one punch KO artist plus he had that weird waist defense of his.

I say Prince wins. Manny gets hit. He would respond with a ferocity. Prince would avoid most of them and land a wicked punch that would hurt Pac.

Originally Posted by the_answer

Originally Posted by P.G.H Angel Eyes

Prince in his prime was defensively savvy and a natural counter puncher and power to boot. The way Pacquiao runs into counter uppercuts when he lunges would give him nightmares against Hamed i think

pac in his prime (currently or maybe on his way)
has got a great chin and awesome power
proof? he KOed the person with arguably the most respected chin in
boxing and man naz is always open
pac is a lot faster than him so even if you say hes a natural counter puncher
hed be hit and will hit the canvass right before he knew it
and you need defense against pacman
say D - E - F - E - N - S - E
defense man.. defense

And to beat Hamed you need to stay back and box and counter and get out of the way of his punches.

Pacquiao doesn't do that. I think we can agree to disagree.

Originally Posted by P.G.H Angel Eyes

Originally Posted by the_answer

Originally Posted by P.G.H Angel Eyes

Prince in his prime was defensively savvy and a natural counter puncher and power to boot. The way Pacquiao runs into counter uppercuts when he lunges would give him nightmares against Hamed i think

pac in his prime (currently or maybe on his way)
has got a great chin and awesome power
proof? he KOed the person with arguably the most respected chin in
boxing and man naz is always open
pac is a lot faster than him so even if you say hes a natural counter puncher
hed be hit and will hit the canvass right before he knew it
and you need defense against pacman
say D - E - F - E - N - S - E
defense man.. defense

And to beat Hamed you need to stay back and box and counter and get out of the way of his punches.

Pacquiao doesn't do that. I think we can agree to disagree.

right on PG....Pac does not move out of the way of punches, he responds with great ferocity when he gets hit. I really dont think he could take a load of Naz's punches. People forget how hard Naz hit. People hit the floor hard.

naz vs. pac? headbutts everywhere thats for sure!

If NAZ is so strong and better in KOing boxers than PAC why can't he drop Barrera or not even shake MAB.. Barrera absorbed his "SUPER POWERFUL" punches!!! LOL. Or maybe he did not hit MAB even once!!! is NAZ blind.....LMAO. On the otherhand PAC drop MAB twice(officially), 3 times in my opinion before his DAD stop the fight. And what are you guys saying that PAC can't hit NAZ, Barrera and "El Terrible" has much much more better defense than NAZ. Didn't saw the PAC-MORALS 3? PAC has great defense, Morales try to chase PAC but was able to land hard punches and dodge many punches. And did you saw the great counter attack that drop morales in 2nd Rnd.?? Have you even seen atleast 1/4 of PAC fight?? He KO his opponents as if they were drunk. And there is one that I remember, woke up after a week in coma. And the other one lose 3 teeth. Hello!!?HALLER??!!!! Sure PAC is not invinsible, who is? Even the great Rocky Marciano who is undefeated was drop a few times in is career. Maybe if a boxer retire early or die undefeated and never been down that will happend. SO PLEASE!!! PAC is better because PAC TKO Barrera, the only man who beat the GREAT NASEEM HAMED of yours......

Barerra made it a gameplan to stay away from his powerful punches and Naz didn't throw a straight left all night and Pacquiao is a whole different fighter then Hamed.

And Barerra won because he avoided Hamed's punches and countered beautifully.

Pacquiao wouldn't fight like Barerra did against Hamed.

So even if Hamed didn't do this or that to Barerra doesn't mean he couldn't do it to Pacquiao because Pacquiao would more or less come forward

Originally Posted by Mad_Dog

Here is by two cents worth...

Pac can be hit easily. His forte is his strength and his speed not his defense. Prince in his prime was not that easy to hit. Also both have great chins. However, the difference was when Prince hit you flush you would stay down. Prince a much more one punch KO artist plus he had that weird waist defense of his.

I say Prince wins. Manny gets hit. He would respond with a ferocity. Prince would avoid most of them and land a wicked punch that would hurt Pac.

It's easy to say Prince would avoid the punches of Pacquaio. ASk morales and Barerra how to do it and they will tell you it's impossible. The only way to fight Pacman is to run until PACMAN GETS TIRED. Like the pacman game. Which can never be true to boxing.

At this moment, Pacquaio is unbeatable. But of course, if he gets distracted he could also lose.

Originally Posted by P.G.H Angel Eyes

Prince in his prime was defensively savvy and a natural counter puncher and power to boot. The way Pacquiao runs into counter uppercuts when he lunges would give him nightmares against Hamed i think

Pacquaio only runs in these days after he knows the opponent is hurt... I think his workrate would really hurt Hamed.

Interesting fight this both on their best day Id just side with Naz. Naz use to eat southpaws for breakfast. Morales is4 years past his best Barrera 6 years, while they were fighting each other it was entertaining watching 2 old warhorses having it. But as they say time and tide waits for no man, stay away from the young hungry guns, unless the moneys good