Re: what matters more quality of opponents or records?
I'd add 'skill' to that. It should be the combination of all of them. That is, the best fighter should be a well-balanced package of skill, quality of opposition and a good record. But I think the quality of opposition is the most important here provided, of course, a boxer wins against them (top class fighters). A skill not used against the best is like a uncut diamond lying underneath the earth. Records can be very misleading. I remember this guy named Carlos Zarate who had an incredible record of 50 or so fights and all wins and I think 49 K0's, something like that. But there was lots of talks then that his opponents were all so-called cab drivers (just an expression, no offense) instead of jet pilots. Once he faced some real deal fighters, like Wilfredo Gomez, he was almost done and have never been the same ever since.
Once in awhile, get outside in fresh air, take a deep breath & with a deep sigh, let out all the things that's bottled up inside you & be free, & you'll get a glimpse of nirvana.
Bookmarks