Thread: Naz vs JMM?

Originally Posted by tysonbruno

Barrera beat Naz with a good game plan but Naz's boxing had been on the slide for a while he was just seeking the big shots looking for ko all the time but Naz could box beautifully when he wanted to he did a nice job on a good fighter called Jose Badillo lovely boxing by Naz that night

not really words I would use in the same sentence.

CC Missy on 10 000 posts

cor blimey, never noticed! Thanks Tam

Originally Posted by Missy

cor blimey, never noticed! Thanks Tam

lol how long did that take you ?

Originally Posted by Tam Seddon

Originally Posted by Missy

cor blimey, never noticed! Thanks Tam

lol how long did that take you ?

it took her over 3 years and congrats missy

The answer is there for everyone to see.....
The fight was offered to Naz and it was turned down.....

It's quite simple really.....

Hamed was an exciting fighter in his day, but any of the top Mexican featherweights would have beaten him.

Morales or Marquez could have given him the same type of beatdown that Barrera gave him.

Originally Posted by SweetPea

Hamed was an exciting fighter in his day, but any of the top Mexican featherweights would have beaten him.

Morales or Marquez could have given him the same type of beatdown that Barrera gave him.

Never

Originally Posted by tysonbruno

Originally Posted by SweetPea

Hamed was an exciting fighter in his day, but any of the top Mexican featherweights would have beaten him.

Morales or Marquez could have given him the same type of beatdown that Barrera gave him.

Never

Barrera vs Naz wern't really beatdown it was quite even first 6 rounds and Barrera only won by 3 points but i do agree Morales and Marquez would both fight smart against Naz and win a decision

Back in the time JMM wanted to fight him I wouldn't have been surprised if Marquez did just enough to lose(like against Norwood)

Originally Posted by SweetPea

Hamed was an exciting fighter in his day, but any of the top Mexican featherweights would have beaten him.

Morales or Marquez could have given him the same type of beatdown that Barrera gave him.

I respect your opinion very much as anyone here but Morales had the style that Hamed would have loved to fight.

Originally Posted by Majesty

Originally Posted by SweetPea

Hamed was an exciting fighter in his day, but any of the top Mexican featherweights would have beaten him.

Morales or Marquez could have given him the same type of beatdown that Barrera gave him.

I respect your opinion very much as anyone here but Morales had the style that Hamed would have loved to fight.

So are you saying that Hamed would have beaten Morales?

Originally Posted by tysonbruno

Barrera beat Naz with a good game plan but Naz's boxing had been on the slide for a while he was just seeking the big shots looking for ko all the time but Naz could box beautifully when he wanted to he did a nice job on a good fighter called Jose Badillo lovely boxing by Naz that night

here to watch it then.

[youtube=425,350]GKQC6b14vx0[/youtube]

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by tysonbruno

Originally Posted by SweetPea

Hamed was an exciting fighter in his day, but any of the top Mexican featherweights would have beaten him.

Morales or Marquez could have given him the same type of beatdown that Barrera gave him.

Never

Barrera vs Naz wern't really beatdown it was quite even first 6 rounds and Barrera only won by 3 points but i do agree Morales and Marquez would both fight smart against Naz and win a decision

Naz was never in the fight.

Even?
3 points?

And people question the judges in Vegas, never in this world.

OMG I posted in my own joke thread

Originally Posted by Missy

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by tysonbruno

Originally Posted by SweetPea

Hamed was an exciting fighter in his day, but any of the top Mexican featherweights would have beaten him.

Morales or Marquez could have given him the same type of beatdown that Barrera gave him.

Never

Barrera vs Naz wern't really beatdown it was quite even first 6 rounds and Barrera only won by 3 points but i do agree Morales and Marquez would both fight smart against Naz and win a decision

Naz was never in the fight.

Even?
3 points?

And people question the judges in Vegas, never in this world.

OMG I posted in my own joke thread

Barrera wern't really throwing much first 6 rounds i watched it years ago and i thought Naz got pretty much beat down but watching it again recently first 6 rounds i was quite surprised it was quite even i had Barrera up 4 points but he had point deducted in 12th so i had him winning by 3 rounds