Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    Poor Whitaker, he was always on the losing end of "bad decisions" (Ramirez, Chavez, De La Hoya), but I don't necessarily agree. I though Ramiez did enough and Whitaker not enough in their first fight, and I though Oscar outsmarted him by stealing rounds in thier fight. I do believe he got stiffed against Chavez. WHAT DO YOU THINK?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1219
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    I thought he won 8 or 9 rounds against Ramirez (and he fought the last half of the fight with a broken hand) , 8 or 9 against Chavez, and 7 against Oscar.

    The loss to Oscar isn't a robbery, it was just a questionable decision. The other two were robberies.


  3. #3
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    Only fight he lost was against Trinidad when Whitaker was well past it and his latest fight when he broke his clavicle if you can call that a real loss because i don't i scored Oscar fight a draw the other fights he totally outboxed Chavez and Ramirez and should of won for certain.

  4. #4
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ted The Bull
    Poor Whitaker, he was always on the losing end of "bad decisions" (Ramirez, Chavez, De La Hoya), but I don't necessarily agree. [b]I though Ramiez did enough and Whitaker not enough in their first fight[b] and I though Oscar outsmarted him by stealing rounds in thier fight. I do believe he got stiffed against Chavez. WHAT DO YOU THINK?
    This fight is largely considered to be a robbery. The magazine "Boxing 88" scored the fight 118-111 for Whitaker.


    Well i made a right mess on trying to bold your comment but i ment the Ramirez fight.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    The coke was a hell of a bad decision

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ted The Bull
    Poor Whitaker, he was always on the losing end of "bad decisions" (Ramirez, Chavez, De La Hoya), but I don't necessarily agree. I though Ramiez did enough and Whitaker not enough in their first fight, and I though Oscar outsmarted him by stealing rounds in thier fight. I do believe he got stiffed against Chavez. WHAT DO YOU THINK?
    Yeah Oscar sure looked smart on those slo-mo replays of the round stealing flurries.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,449
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    963
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    Yes. He was robbed.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2839
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    The De La Hoya one is tough for me, because Whitaker is my all time favorite but I don't know if he did enough in the later rounds of that fight during the championship rounds. A lot of rounds were made close by De La Hoya coming on late. It was a close fight, it could haave gone either way, I've got no problem with De La Hoya or WHitaker winning that fight.

    Ramirez and Chavez were robberies. He won both of those fights with no question at all.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4958
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    Sweet Pea I think it's time to revive your thread.

  10. #10
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick
    Sweet Pea I think it's time to revive your thread.
    I agree used to love doing my scorecard and seeing everyones different opinions infact i'll make the topic now so Sweetpea can do it

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    Quote Originally Posted by amat
    The De La Hoya one is tough for me, because Whitaker is my all time favorite but I don't know if he did enough in the later rounds of that fight during the championship rounds. A lot of rounds were made close by De La Hoya coming on late. It was a close fight, it could haave gone either way, I've got no problem with De La Hoya or WHitaker winning that fight.

    Ramirez and Chavez were robberies. He won both of those fights with no question at all.
    Agreed..a shameful dec the Chavez match.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1051
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    i don't think a fighter should be giving credit for stealing rounds. it's not illeagal but it's plain corny.

    i'm still mad at ray lenard for saying he stole rounds against haglar.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1219
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    Quote Originally Posted by 'The Boxer'
    i don't think a fighter should be giving credit for stealing rounds. it's not illeagal but it's plain corny.
    In terms of Whitaker-DLH, I think the big thing is that Oscar's idea of stealing rounds was to throw a 10 punch flurry where he missed every single punch.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,702
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1138
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    The Chavez decision is the worst i have seen !!! Ramirez isn't far behind.
    DLH was close but i thought Oscar won that one...just!
    Whitaker was an outstanding fighter not given the credit he deserves.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Was Whitaker a victim of bad decisons?

    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea
    Quote Originally Posted by 'The Boxer'
    i don't think a fighter should be giving credit for stealing rounds. it's not illeagal but it's plain corny.
    In terms of Whitaker-DLH, I think the big thing is that Oscar's idea of stealing rounds was to throw a 10 punch flurry where he missed every single punch.

    But is surely worked for him.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing