| | | Boxing Talk Chat about the latest boxing news | 
05-25-2007, 04:06 PM
|  | VIOLENT DARK SIDE | |
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: in a house
Posts: 4,691
Punch Power: 388 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? Kelley had only lost once
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
He's Back To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | 
05-25-2007, 04:15 PM
|  | VIOLENT DARK SIDE | |
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: in a house
Posts: 4,691
Punch Power: 388 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? Quote: |
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING Quote: |
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO Naz had a good chin for sure he only had flash knockdowns against him and some he was off balance he had to take big full blooded shots off Barrera i think Naz could stop the Pacman i think sometimes Naz's power gets underrated | Naz can't lose to anyone in your eyes  how about Tyson vs Naz how would that have gone
Regarding this fight well i might agree that Naz could win because Pacs come forward pressure style could be disaster for Pac. | Double KO!!!!  | 
05-25-2007, 04:18 PM
|  | The Future! | |
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,327
Punch Power: 1279 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? heres the comparison:
naz was a entertainer that was protected and hyped.
pac is a entertaining warrior who came up from the brutal battles in asia.
both fighters first true elite fighter they fought was mab.
naz got owned against his first elite.
pac demolished his first elite.
after naz first elite he pretty much prove he had no heart.
after pacs first lose to an elite(morales) he brutally took out the legendary iron chin of morales.
naz has power up until an elite.
pac has power to make the elite quit.
mab took everything naz had.
mab couldn't take anymore of pacs power after the 10th.
ok enough with that, no wait one more.
naz is a clown in the ring.
pac is a proven monster in the ring.
so yea pac knocks him the fwock out cold no doubt.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
If I can play with that pxxxy like how I play a guitar!
| 
05-25-2007, 04:23 PM
|  | VIOLENT DARK SIDE | |
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: in a house
Posts: 4,691
Punch Power: 388 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? I can't help but think Naz gets some harsh critisism on here | 
05-25-2007, 04:23 PM
| | Forum Amature | |
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 40
Punch Power: 0 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? Quote: |
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO Kelley had only lost once | cant se what this proves, kelley was not in his prime against naz.. still tough, but not an elite fighter, seems as if you are misreading, i havent stated kelley was a walk over, im saying that kelley wasnt prime, everybody knows this..
julio cesar chavez has only lost 1 before de la hoya.. this proves you can be out of prime, with only 1 loss..
me saying this proves my point as much as yours, its just i faill to se, what it in the end proves.. | 
05-25-2007, 04:24 PM
|  | The Future! | |
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,327
Punch Power: 1279 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? Quote: |
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO Naz had a good chin for sure he only had flash knockdowns against him and some he was off balance he had to take big full blooded shots off Barrera i think Naz could stop the Pacman i think sometimes Naz's power gets underrated | are you serious  naz power underrated? its actually overrated who did he knock out worth talking about? | 
05-25-2007, 04:30 PM
|  | 34-2-0 27KOs | |
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Hopeman, Scotland
Posts: 3,175
Punch Power: 429 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? pacman crushes dickhead hameds head in till his balls explode
__________________ Bernard "The Executioner" Hopkins To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
49-5-1 32KOs | 
05-25-2007, 04:31 PM
|  | VIOLENT DARK SIDE | |
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: in a house
Posts: 4,691
Punch Power: 388 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? Bungu,Ingle,Vazquez,Kelley,Johnson,Medina | 
05-25-2007, 04:39 PM
|  | The Future! | |
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,327
Punch Power: 1279 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? Quote: |
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO Bungu,Ingle,Vazquez,Kelley,Johnson,Medina | ahahahahaha but seriously who  | 
05-25-2007, 04:39 PM
|  | The Future! | |
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,327
Punch Power: 1279 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? Quote: |
Originally Posted by ds91 pacman crushes dickhead hameds head in till his balls explode |  | 
05-25-2007, 04:40 PM
|  | The Future! | |
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,327
Punch Power: 1279 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? +144 | 
05-25-2007, 04:42 PM
|  | VIOLENT DARK SIDE | |
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: in a house
Posts: 4,691
Punch Power: 388 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? He can't be that bad he won WBO,IBF,WBC and beat the guy who was WBA but was stripped because he fought Naz Naz was a good fighter he was recognised as number 1 featherweight for 4 or 5 year | 
05-25-2007, 04:54 PM
|  | They are not windmills! | |
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: The Moon
Posts: 15,436
Punch Power: 2063 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? Quote: |
Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather don't know..but i think prince is slick enough to duck and counter, but manny is quick enough to land sometimes too...don't know if PAC could take prince's power though, but naz could take his because prince did have a chin... | I think a lot of it comes down to what period Hamed we are talking about. Hamed was showing more and more flaws the further his career was going. The ego grew, training habits became slack and the Hamed that fought Barrera was really a one trick pony. He could only throw 1 at a time and he was extremely ineffective. Of course Barrera fought the perfect fight, but Hamed showed little of the flair that had become his trademark. I couldnt imagine Pac fighting the style of fight against Naseem that Barrera did. Pac is more open defensively.
Its an intriguing matchup and Ive no way of picking a winner...  , JonesJrMayweather for an interesting thread
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | 
05-25-2007, 05:01 PM
| | Forum Champ | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 445
Punch Power: 225 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? Quote: |
Originally Posted by Julius Rain heres the comparison:
naz was a entertainer that was protected and hyped.
pac is a entertaining warrior who came up from the brutal battles in asia.
both fighters first true elite fighter they fought was mab.
naz got owned against his first elite.
pac demolished his first elite.
after naz first elite he pretty much prove he had no heart.
after pacs first lose to an elite(morales) he brutally took out the legendary iron chin of morales.
naz has power up until an elite.
pac has power to make the elite quit.
mab took everything naz had.
mab couldn't take anymore of pacs power after the 10th.
ok enough with that, no wait one more.
naz is a clown in the ring.
pac is a proven monster in the ring.
so yea pac knocks him the fwock out cold no doubt.
| nice! | 
05-25-2007, 05:11 PM
|  | Old Guard's PFP#1 | |
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: CT Usa
Posts: 8,410
Punch Power: 2320 | | Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been? SHEESH!!! They talk about us Mayweather guys are Fanboyz.....
Pac-Fans think the man walks on water and can leap tall buildings in a single bound
Naz fans think he is a superhuman juggernaut that really has a flying carpet...
Instead why dont you concede that it is a hell of a Matchup between to guys that arent exactly conventional or predictable... Mab, Morales are very fundamentallly sound Boxers and very Orthodox... Naz or Pac arent, Pac is very off balance and applies pressure utilizing handspeed and power... Naz is like rubberman avoiding punches and has great power and reflexes, who also is offbalance and shows more angles than anyone Pac has ever seen....
Just concede it would be a crowd pleasing fight......
And for the record.... Floyd would beat the living shat out both of them
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
140lb man with a 300lb heart...Miss you Champ | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:54 AM. | |