| | | Boxing Talk Chat about the latest boxing news | 
06-18-2007, 03:00 AM
| | Little Aussie Battler | |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,468
Punch Power: 850 | | Boxing needs more catchweight fights. More fighters should think like Bhop and Winky.
Think of the possible great matchups.
cotto v hatton at 144 pounds? Cos cotto cant quite make 140 and hatton soesnt like fighting at 147.
Taylor v Calzaghe at 164?
DLH v Margarito 150?
Tszyu v Gatti 144?
RJJ v Calzaghe 172?
Pac v Diaz 128?
Any other ideas? The possibilities are endless! | 
06-18-2007, 01:26 PM
|  | Non Pareil | |
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Galway, Ireland
Posts: 11,060
Punch Power: 1426 | | Re: Boxing needs more catchweight fights. I think the implementation of catchweights, altough providing fantastic matchups and possibly boosting boxing's image to the general public may actually damage boxing in the long run.
For example Taylor-.Calzaghe. When 2 good fighters from different divisions meet one good fighter leading his division will win and another good fighter leading his division will lose.
Let us say for arguements sake Taylor wins.
This greatly boosts Taylors credibilty and Therefore the cred. of the middleweight division.
However a loss would leave Calzaghe severely comprimised and take away from the prestige of the entire super middleweight division.
Entertaining in the here and now, but negative effects in the future i think.
__________________ "Pain is Just the feeling of Weakness leaving the body." | 
06-18-2007, 01:34 PM
|  | Ginger...be sympathetic. | |
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 3,261
Punch Power: 538 | | Re: Boxing needs more catchweight fights. Doesn't this kind of take the point away from divisions? Surely these fights can be made at specific weights, rather than catchweights. Totally disagree with the idea really. | 
06-18-2007, 01:38 PM
|  | Non Pareil | |
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Galway, Ireland
Posts: 11,060
Punch Power: 1426 | | Re: Boxing needs more catchweight fights. Quote: |
Originally Posted by bzkfn Doesn't this kind of take the point away from divisions? Surely these fights can be made at specific weights, rather than catchweights. Totally disagree with the idea really. | Quote: |
Originally Posted by bzkfn Doesn't this kind of take the point away from divisions? Surely these fights can be made at specific weights, rather than catchweights. Totally disagree with the idea really. | yUP...tOTALLY AGREE. | 
06-18-2007, 01:39 PM
| | Forum Greatest Of All Time | |
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,095
Punch Power: 211 | | Re: Boxing needs more catchweight fights. calzaghe could never go a pound below 168 imo
__________________
Thats cricket
| 
06-18-2007, 01:48 PM
|  | Non Pareil | |
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Galway, Ireland
Posts: 11,060
Punch Power: 1426 | | Re: Boxing needs more catchweight fights. U may be right there poom he always looks natural at his weight and i have a feeling he may walk around about 173. He also runs a huge amount in training which would suggest that his body is just naturally that of a super middle as his weights have been pretty consistent for the past no. of years. | 
06-18-2007, 01:54 PM
| | Forum Greatest Of All Time | |
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,095
Punch Power: 211 | | Re: Boxing needs more catchweight fights. Quote: |
Originally Posted by hitmandonny U may be right there poom he always looks natural at his weight and i have a feeling he may walk around about 173. He also runs a huge amount in training which would suggest that his body is just naturally that of a super middle as his weights have been pretty consistent for the past no. of years. | I just fnished his book and he goes on about the pain of making 168 all the time,
he says if he didn't box he would be about a 14 stone guy which is hm.. 196 , | 
06-18-2007, 01:56 PM
| | The Lord of Darkness | |
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,782
Punch Power: 1440 | | Re: Boxing needs more catchweight fights.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | 
06-18-2007, 04:37 PM
|  | Ginger...be sympathetic. | |
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 3,261
Punch Power: 538 | | Re: Boxing needs more catchweight fights. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al |  hahahaha!!!  | 
06-18-2007, 04:53 PM
|  | Non Pareil | |
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Galway, Ireland
Posts: 11,060
Punch Power: 1426 | | Re: Boxing needs more catchweight fights. Is his book out long poom? | 
06-18-2007, 05:12 PM
|  | Moderator - Old Guard | |
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,842
Punch Power: 1040 | | Re: Boxing needs more catchweight fights. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Poom Quote: |
Originally Posted by hitmandonny U may be right there poom he always looks natural at his weight and i have a feeling he may walk around about 173. He also runs a huge amount in training which would suggest that his body is just naturally that of a super middle as his weights have been pretty consistent for the past no. of years. | I just fnished his book and he goes on about the pain of making 168 all the time,
he says if he didn't box he would be about a 14 stone guy which is hm.. 196 , | By the way he also goes on about how much he loves eating, I can see that he would be a pretty big guy, he's got a fairly big frame as well, so getting all those pounds off must be a pain in the arse. He was saying after a few fights in 02/03 that he was struggling to make the weight and looking to move up, so probably getting to 165 would be beyond him, or it would be ahuge strain anyways.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
CHAMPION of Killersheep's Sportsbook :- Season 6
| |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:05 AM. | |