Thread: Jerry Roth's scoring of PBF/Castillo 1

Ok like most people I feel Castillo won the fight with his effective aggressiveness.

But the most shocking thing to me was Jerry Roth's scorecard. I mean with Jerry Roth I don't usually get shocked, because IMO he's produced some really fucked up, ass-backwards scorecards over the years. He seems to favor aggressors, whether or not they are effectivly aggressive seems irrelevant to him. He had DLH/Whitaker 116-110 for DLH, and he gave Trinidad a 115-113 nod over DLH (robbery).

So knowing Roth's tendancy to side with the aggressor, what do you think caused him to see it 115-111 for Mayweather? From round 4 or 5 on Castillo showed TRUE effective aggressiveness. He fought the exact fight that one might think Roth would love to see. So what do you think he saw in Mayweather's fighting, from round 5 on, that would cause Roth to give the rounds to Floyd?

I dunno, to me it just seems like the guy never gets it right. He's either scoring rounds for uneffective aggressors or screwing effective aggressors out of rounds. Am I being too hard on the guy?

jerry roth is an asshole

hes the one on the right over here




<---

Originally Posted by Beanflicker

Ok like most people I feel Castillo won the fight with his effective aggressiveness.

But the most shocking thing to me was Jerry Roth's scorecard. I mean with Jerry Roth I don't usually get shocked, because IMO he's produced some really fucked up, ass-backwards scorecards over the years. He seems to favor aggressors, whether or not they are effectivly aggressive seems irrelevant to him. He had DLH/Whitaker 116-110 for DLH, and he gave Trinidad a 115-113 nod over DLH (robbery).

So knowing Roth's tendancy to side with the aggressor, what do you think caused him to see it&#160; 115-111 for Mayweather? From round 4 or 5 on Castillo showed TRUE effective aggressiveness. He fought the exact fight that one might think Roth would love to see. So what do you think he saw in Mayweather's fighting, from round 5 on, that would cause Roth to give the rounds to Floyd?

I dunno, to me it just seems like the guy never gets it right. He's either scoring rounds for uneffective aggressors or screwing effective aggressors out of rounds. Am I being too hard on the guy?

Who's still living in 2002?

Originally Posted by Beanflicker

Ok like most people I feel Castillo won the fight with his effective aggressiveness.

But the most shocking thing to me was Jerry Roth's scorecard. I mean with Jerry Roth I don't usually get shocked, because IMO he's produced some really fucked up, a**-backwards scorecards over the years. He seems to favor aggressors, whether or not they are effectivly aggressive seems irrelevant to him. He had DLH/Whitaker 116-110 for DLH, and he gave Trinidad a 115-113 nod over DLH (robbery).

So knowing Roth's tendancy to side with the aggressor, what do you think caused him to see it 115-111 for Mayweather? From round 4 or 5 on Castillo showed TRUE effective aggressiveness. He fought the exact fight that one might think Roth would love to see. So what do you think he saw in Mayweather's fighting, from round 5 on, that would cause Roth to give the rounds to Floyd?

I dunno, to me it just seems like the guy never gets it right. He's either scoring rounds for uneffective aggressors or screwing effective aggressors out of rounds. Am I being too hard on the guy?

Jerry Roth has had many bad nights on the scorecards.

What's funny about this post is that you direct the bad judging of 115-111 in favor of Mayweather and use the far more absurd 116-110 Delahoya over Whitaker as an after thought.

Originally Posted by frozensolid_702

Originally Posted by Beanflicker

Ok like most people I feel Castillo won the fight with his effective aggressiveness.

But the most shocking thing to me was Jerry Roth's scorecard. I mean with Jerry Roth I don't usually get shocked, because IMO he's produced some really fucked up, a**-backwards scorecards over the years. He seems to favor aggressors, whether or not they are effectivly aggressive seems irrelevant to him. He had DLH/Whitaker 116-110 for DLH, and he gave Trinidad a 115-113 nod over DLH (robbery).

So knowing Roth's tendancy to side with the aggressor, what do you think caused him to see it 115-111 for Mayweather? From round 4 or 5 on Castillo showed TRUE effective aggressiveness. He fought the exact fight that one might think Roth would love to see. So what do you think he saw in Mayweather's fighting, from round 5 on, that would cause Roth to give the rounds to Floyd?

I dunno, to me it just seems like the guy never gets it right. He's either scoring rounds for uneffective aggressors or screwing effective aggressors out of rounds. Am I being too hard on the guy?

Jerry Roth has had many bad nights on the scorecards.

What's funny about this post is that you direct the bad judging of 115-111 in favor of Mayweather and use the far more absurd 116-110 Delahoya over Whitaker as an after thought.

I had Floyd-Castillo I scored 113-113, so he was 2 points off in my book.
I also had Oscar-Tito a draw, at 114-114, so Roth was 1 point off there.
I had Whitaker-Oscar as 114-112 Whitaker, so he was 4 off there.

1 point is completely acceptable for a judge, it's standard margin of error. You can never criticize a judge for being one round different than you.
I think a two point difference is when you can first start being critical.

So 115-111 Mayweather is a scorecard open to criticism, just not as much as Whitaker-Oscar at 116-110.

No doubt 116-110 for DLH over Whitaker is outrageous, but I used this example because I think these rounds in Mayweather/Castillo were much more clear cut than DLH/Whitaker, which is a judge's nightmare.

Maybe Jerry Roth is David Lee Roth in disguise? Now there's an idiot!
Might explain some of those ridiculous scorecards of his!