Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: WBC laying down the law on their champions

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    16,122
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default WBC laying down the law on their champions

    Diaconu is fully fit and wanted to fulfill his mandatory challenge to BCD but BCD is now fighting Johnson so Diaconu had his oppertunity rejected and instead will face the next highest ranked fighter(who is that?)_ and the winner of that will fight the winner of BCD v Johnson.

    Also,Casamayor has to rematch Santz Cruz as has been sanctioned or risk losing his title(I didn't know he had one,I think it's an interim one) and David Diaz will be installed as the full champ I'm guessing. I think for the sake of the title picture,Casamayor need not fight Santz Cruz but on the other hand...the first fight...robbery comes to mind. Should he fights Kats or rematch Santa Cruz folks?

    Screw the WBC and their fricking stupid interim titles BS.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,306
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions

    I'd prefer for him to fight Kats, but Santa Cruz does deserve the re-match. I say give SC another go around with Joel

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    4,759
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1263
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions

    Quote Originally Posted by El Gamo
    Diaconu is fully fit and wanted to fulfill his mandatory challenge to BCD but BCD is now fighting Johnson so Diaconu had his oppertunity rejected and instead will face the next highest ranked fighter(who is that?)_ and the winner of that will fight the winner of BCD v Johnson.

    Also,Casamayor has to rematch Santz Cruz as has been sanctioned or risk losing his title(I didn't know he had one,I think it's an interim one) and David Diaz will be installed as the full champ I'm guessing. I think for the sake of the title picture,Casamayor need not fight Santz Cruz but on the other hand...the first fight...robbery comes to mind. Should he fights Kats or rematch Santa Cruz folks?

    Screw the WBC and their fricking stupid interim titles BS.
    david is the full WBC champion... casa was either the WBC interim champ, and/or the #1 for the WBC belt...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    a local pub near you.
    Posts
    7,652
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2777
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions

    Why can't the WBC put Diaz and Santa Cruz together? I mean they own both titles and can do whatever needs to be done. Give Santa Cruz another WBC shot........but I wouldnt care which belt he fought for. I want to see a Katsidis fight.

    An alternative would be to give Santa Cruz a double interim belt.
    "If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1718
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions

    Tough shit for Diaconu, he was the one who pulled out and he isnt the draw in that fight. Dawson shouldnt have to wait around for him. I think they dropped the Casa Santa Cruz rematch, which is questionable....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2063
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions

    Quote Originally Posted by Sugar_shaw
    I'd prefer for him to fight Kats, but Santa Cruz does deserve the re-match. I say give SC another go around with Joel
    i say forget joel for now and have a cruz kats fight. we all know joel lost therfor cruz should fight for the title not joel.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1464
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC laying down the law on their champions

    Quote Originally Posted by El Gamo
    Diaconu is fully fit and wanted to fulfill his mandatory challenge to BCD but BCD is now fighting Johnson so Diaconu had his oppertunity rejected and instead will face the next highest ranked fighter(who is that?)_ and the winner of that will fight the winner of BCD v Johnson.

    Also,Casamayor has to rematch Santz Cruz as has been sanctioned or risk losing his title(I didn't know he had one,I think it's an interim one) and David Diaz will be installed as the full champ I'm guessing. I think for the sake of the title picture,Casamayor need not fight Santz Cruz but on the other hand...the first fight...robbery comes to mind. Should he fights Kats or rematch Santa Cruz folks?

    Screw the WBC and their fricking stupid interim titles BS.
    In the words of James tony.
    WBC stands for We Be Crooks.
    Balls

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing