Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Worse decision makers in boxing history

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,657
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Felix Trinidad is one of my favorite fighters in boxing history but I am fastly losing respect for the guy because of his poor choices, I must list the many he has made since a brilliant start.

    After the Vargas victory

    1. In pursuit of the great RJJ Trinidad decided to take the next step moving up to 160 after a short year at 154, he had unified the titles and had brutally beat boxings NEXT BIG THINGS, why would fighting RJJ justify a great career you already had at the age of 27, it's no doubt in my mind he could have had just as good of a run at 154 as he did at 147.

    2. Joppy and Hopkins had no star power at the time Trinidad decided to move up, there was no reason to take those fights other than use them as a stepping stone for RJJ, there were much bigger fights at 154 (or on the way) than those fights at 160 with De La Hoya 2, Mosley, Quartey, etc. Legacy fights waited for him at 154 why move up

    3. After the loss to Hopkins why the retirement, many boxers who go up in weight and lose will just go back down, examples like Hatton, De La Hoya, Wright, etc. He should have just went back to 154 and dominated, instead he fights some French chef and then retires, that made no sense at all.

    4. First comeback against Mayorga was brilliant, Tito looked like his old self, but instead of capatilizing off of that performance he took a fight against Wright that was a lose lose situation, and made no sense career wise, it was nothing to gain from it with a victory and it was much to lose with a lopsided loss, puzzling to me, then a second retirement WTF

    5. Second comeback was probably the only time Tito was a natural MW and instead of fighting at 160 he fights at 170 against an old RJJ who has showed his chin can be china at times, he loses and for some strange reason get's a title shot against Pavlik at 160 and declines??

    This guy is the worse decision maker in all my time watching boxing, and he is losing me as a fan

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1386
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Dick Flaherty. He'll be judging the JMM-MP 2. I heard he dicked up many major fights.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2211
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Joe Louis.
    091

  4. #4
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    I do think Felix Trinidad could have been the best 154 pounder in history. After Vargas and De la Hoya he should have taken on Shane Mosley, Vernon Forrest, Ricardo Mayorga, and/or Corey Spinks (which would have been a bad style matchup for him though). Had he held on there then I doubt anyone at 154 would have beaten him, until Winky Wright got a shot.


    Shane Mosley is not the best decision maker and neither is RJJ

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1219
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    I can't criticize Tito for taking a risk and moving up to 160 to try to win the middleweight title. Tito wanted to be an all-time great, and all-time greats take challenges and fight the best. I give him credit for moving up to 160, destroying Joppy, and fighting Hopkins.

    However, I do wish Tito had kept fighting instead of retiring. There's no shame in losing to Hopkins, who's an all-time great middleweight and who fought the fight of his life that night. Tito had nothing to be ashamed of, he should have moved back to 154 and kept fighting, he could've become a champ there again quickly.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1256
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Kelly Pavlik





    He's helping campaign for Hillary What is he thinking, maybe he's punch drunk already?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,394
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1181
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea View Post
    I can't criticize Tito for taking a risk and moving up to 160 to try to win the middleweight title. Tito wanted to be an all-time great, and all-time greats take challenges and fight the best. I give him credit for moving up to 160, destroying Joppy, and fighting Hopkins.

    However, I do wish Tito had kept fighting instead of retiring. There's no shame in losing to Hopkins, who's an all-time great middleweight and who fought the fight of his life that night. Tito had nothing to be ashamed of, he should have moved back to 154 and kept fighting, he could've become a champ there again quickly.
    Hi SweetPea you are righ, but i understand to Bookeeper and Lyle too , the point is if Tito loss with Hopkins and Winky why he returned back if he knew that he didnt have anything to get in that Div.of 160 pnd. , so then he came back with Jones Jr. to fight in SMW Div. and make the ridicolus for spot all the glory that he reached, we know that all of these is about Money , but his History ? So is true Tito had nothing to be ashamed , but his fans lose his CREDIBILITY IN HIM....... thats my point of view.......SweetPea

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    7,495
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2637
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Watching him against Jones in my eyes his stock went up. For the first time I was impressed.
    Pain lasts a only a minute, but the memory will last forever....

    boxingbournemouth - Cornelius Carrs private boxing tuition and personal fitness training

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2211
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrap View Post
    Watching him against Jones in my eyes his stock went up. For the first time I was impressed.
    Trinidad?!
    091

  10. #10
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Roy fighting Tarver a second time....all Tarver wanted to do was to fight Roy until he beat him and Roy gave him the opportunity! Roy could have KO'd Tarver in the first fight and Tarver would have still called for a rematch.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    7,495
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2637
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Yes, Trinadad
    Pain lasts a only a minute, but the memory will last forever....

    boxingbournemouth - Cornelius Carrs private boxing tuition and personal fitness training

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2211
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrap View Post
    Yes, Trinadad
    I'm just surprised that was the first time he impressed you.
    091

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,657
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    I'm just surprised that was the first time he impressed you.
    Great point

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    912
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    I agree with much of the things said here. I'm a huge fan of Tito but he has made some bad choices in his life. Number one in that list that no one has mentioned yet is not getting a new trainer that would actually teach him something. By the time Tito became champion (at age 20) he had already surpassed his dad by a mile and would learn nothing more from him. I understand ot was his dad but Tito should've moved on long ago.

    I can't fault him for moving to 160 though. You gotta remember that at the time the only big name in that area was De La Hoya and he had just lossed to a then not so popular Mosley. Quartay was semi inactive and had recently been beaten by Vargas. All the other fighters mentioned here were not even in Trinidad's stratosphere at the time.

    But pretty much everything else he did after the loss was pretty damn stupid.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,657
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Worse decision makers in boxing history

    Quote Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan View Post
    I agree with much of the things said here. I'm a huge fan of Tito but he has made some bad choices in his life. Number one in that list that no one has mentioned yet is not getting a new trainer that would actually teach him something. By the time Tito became champion (at age 20) he had already surpassed his dad by a mile and would learn nothing more from him. I understand ot was his dad but Tito should've moved on long ago.

    I can't fault him for moving to 160 though. You gotta remember that at the time the only big name in that area was De La Hoya and he had just lossed to a then not so popular Mosley. Quartay was semi inactive and had recently been beaten by Vargas. All the other fighters mentioned here were not even in Trinidad's stratosphere at the time.

    But pretty much everything else he did after the loss was pretty damn stupid.
    After Mosley fought Adrian Stone there was strong talks for them to fight each other, but Trinidad opted to fight at 160 so I can't agree with you there. Trinidad was P4P1 on many list with Mosley coming in at #2 or 3, RJJ started to lose ground at a slow pace, how many times in history have we seen a P4P #1 and 2 face off, not too many, Trinidad was fine at 154. If it was about money there was no fight bigger than De La Hoya 2, and as far as Quartey his decision making is almost as bad as Tito's with retiring after every loss, but it was only a matter of time until the two fought, it was alway's Quartey's goal too fight Tito. Like I said 154 was fine

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 50
    Last Post: 06-16-2007, 06:10 AM
  2. More Info on Howard Cosell's decision to leave boxing?
    By Beanflicker in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-12-2007, 12:15 AM
  3. Boxing History
    By vickstar in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-04-2006, 05:13 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-04-2006, 09:21 PM
  5. Kessler vs. the money makers
    By azumir in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-23-2006, 07:53 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing