It occured to me the other day that in boxing today there is not a fighter whose record is not ripped to threads on this forum. In fact it seems that any fighters record can be questioned.
Here are a few details.
Floyd Mayweather. Had a good start to career but hasnt fought anyone of note above 140. Sure DLH was good but is now old, and Hatton was too small. Ducks real Welters.
Bernard Hopkins. Only real wins are against blown up welters, and he lost against first decent MW he faced twice. Tarver was weight drained.
Manny Pac. Only notable wins are against old fighters, and he was lucky to get two decisions against Marquez.
Miguel Cotto. Only two major wins are against washed up fighters in Mosely and Judah. Is robotic and chinny.
Joe Calzaghe. Is undefeated but fought 20 defences v bums.
Ricky Hatton. 2 best wins against shot fighters, is shit at 147 and should have lost to Collazo.
I do not agree with these statments. All those mentioned are great fighters and have achieved extraordinary things in boxing.
My question is tho, are all fighters records padded these days, or are we all to harsh on fighters such as these? Should we give fighters a break and stop being haters?
Bookmarks