Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 61

Thread: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2482
    Cool Clicks

    Default Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Its on another website, this has seemed inevitable lately, they just have to make it official. Apparently both sides have agreed in principle, they just have to work out things like the TV network, apparently HBO and Showtime are both interested but Showtime has the better date.

    Nice fight, really looking forward to it as a fan of Guzman. Tough first fight at a new weight class for Joan but I'm favoring him.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1270
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Poor Nate CAmpbell. I like him, always have for some reason, and I was hoping he'd have a nice little reign at LW to go out on, a few decent paydays. I'd pick him to beat Casa, Diaz again, Kats, Pac if he stays at LW, pretty much anyone but Guzman he has an excellent chance against imo. I guess it isn't a sure thing Guzman beats him but Joan is by far the toughest guy for anyone to fight at LW right now imo, and that's having not even seen him at the weight.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2482
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    I'm not sure there's a real big payday out there for Nate to be honest. I mean except for Pac but I personally don't see Pac fighting him, even if he beat Joan. Not sure Casa's a real big payday. I do agree he'd beat most guys, he'd ruin Katsidis. But I do think Guzman will win, its probably the worst matchup for Nate out there right now.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2247
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    This is a really good match-up IMO. Tough fight for both guys. I'd have to favor Guzman also but I'll be rooting for Nate!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,604
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1533
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Hard hard to pick, i'll take guzman
    Hidden Content Click clack ! Give up the purse.........or yetti will find you.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1270
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    I'm not sure there's a real big payday out there for Nate to be honest. I mean except for Pac but I personally don't see Pac fighting him, even if he beat Joan. Not sure Casa's a real big payday. I do agree he'd beat most guys, he'd ruin Katsidis. But I do think Guzman will win, its probably the worst matchup for Nate out there right now.
    Yea maybe.. I just get the impression Guzman doesn't have much drawing power at all. Im sure any of those guys would present at least as much money for CAmpbell, and a much more winnable fight. Not to say I'm not excited about this fight, I'd just like to see Campbell win. I guess Guzman deserves the payday as well, and it is a great fight.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3059
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Where Guzman is concerned nothing is ever certain.. annoyingly

    So many brilliant fights at lightweight, none look bad.. this is probably bad for Nate though.

    I'm a bit worried for Guzman he'll "go" overnight. If not, hopefully the titles help him get some "star" names, and he wont be so bloody inactive.
    Last edited by Fenster; 06-26-2008 at 10:49 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2064
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Im still not completely sold on guzman, sure he can box but nothing like floyd. I think his being a bit overhype, his already up in his 30's with no huge win on his resume. So is Nate and Casa but they've been in better fighters with better fighters. I think Nate or Casa can take guzman out of the hype list. I can't see guzman really being dominant against any top lightweights right now, Pac JMM Nate Casa. NOUN. IMO all will be eliminated and we will be back to square one and the two remain yet again will be Pac and JMM, then we can have another fucking crazy lets get drunk and fight Pac vs JMM 3 type night!!!

  9. #9
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Guzman is the best Lightweight at the moment and i would pick him to beat everyone at Lightweight including Pacquiao, a fight with Marquez would be a pick em though.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2064
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Guzman is the best Lightweight at the moment and i would pick him to beat everyone at Lightweight including Pacquiao, a fight with Marquez would be a pick em though.
    i really don't get why? what has he done anyways? plus his like 35 now and he hasn't fought at lightweight. its insulting to casa and nate. Not so for JMM and Pac cause they too haven't fought at the weight, and those two are the two best at the weight guzman formerly was. Not even just two of the best in a weight class but maybe top two p4p fighter right now and I aint seen guzman scrape top ten at the least p4p ranking.

    I think you guys should reconsider about guzman being the best at lightweight, imo his likely to end up smashed up by the other top fighters.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1719
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Nate has the power to turn this fight, no doubt Guzman will be backpeddling from the first bell. Soto gave Guzman problems when he cornered him, but his problem was he hardly ever cornered him. Nate has way better ring generalship than that, I'm sticking with Campbell. Guzman has only impressed me with his speed so far.

  12. #12
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Guzman is the best Lightweight at the moment and i would pick him to beat everyone at Lightweight including Pacquiao, a fight with Marquez would be a pick em though.
    i really don't get why? what has he done anyways? plus his like 35 now and he hasn't fought at lightweight. its insulting to casa and nate. Not so for JMM and Pac cause they too haven't fought at the weight, and those two are the two best at the weight guzman formerly was. Not even just two of the best in a weight class but maybe top two p4p fighter right now and I aint seen guzman scrape top ten at the least p4p ranking.

    I think you guys should reconsider about guzman being the best at lightweight, imo his likely to end up smashed up by the other top fighters.
    What is it insulting to Casa or Nate ?? its purely my opinion that skill wise he is the best whats wrong in that ?? he has one of the quickiest hands, he reminds me of Mayweather especially with the shoulder roll, he has the quickiest feet. And boxing skills wise he is right up there with the very best at the moment, i know your not high on Guzman but i am and i will for certain bet that Guzman beats Pacquiao if that fight happens.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2064
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Guzman is the best Lightweight at the moment and i would pick him to beat everyone at Lightweight including Pacquiao, a fight with Marquez would be a pick em though.
    i really don't get why? what has he done anyways? plus his like 35 now and he hasn't fought at lightweight. its insulting to casa and nate. Not so for JMM and Pac cause they too haven't fought at the weight, and those two are the two best at the weight guzman formerly was. Not even just two of the best in a weight class but maybe top two p4p fighter right now and I aint seen guzman scrape top ten at the least p4p ranking.

    I think you guys should reconsider about guzman being the best at lightweight, imo his likely to end up smashed up by the other top fighters.
    What is it insulting to Casa or Nate ?? its purely my opinion that skill wise he is the best whats wrong in that ?? he has one of the quickiest hands, he reminds me of Mayweather especially with the shoulder roll, he has the quickiest feet. And boxing skills wise he is right up there with the very best at the moment, i know your not high on Guzman but i am and i will for certain bet that Guzman beats Pacquiao if that fight happens.
    well its because casa and nate are legit lightweights that has cement accomplishments, ok then its just your oppinion like you said. Plus i am sure you will bet guzman will beat pac 90% of the time you pick pacs oppenent

    Im gonna go watch more of guzman, but i would never compare him to floyd. Floyd by 28 had accomplished ten times more then guzman has up to this point right now. Skill wise, i think its just a case of fans of floyds style being high on it but yet on an older less known fighter and less than half the accomplishment of the original floyd. it will end as soon as he steps up his level of oppenent, unlike floyd.

  14. #14
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Nate has the power to turn this fight, no doubt Guzman will be backpeddling from the first bell. Soto gave Guzman problems when he cornered him, but his problem was he hardly ever cornered him. Nate has way better ring generalship than that, I'm sticking with Campbell. Guzman has only impressed me with his speed so far.
    I thought he gave Soto a boxing lesson i only had Soto winning a couple of rounds, yes Soto did corner Guzman but that was few a far between. Even great fighters like Mayweather and Jones got cornered from time to time, but Guzman still dominated most of the action against Soto.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3059
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Guzman don't carry no weight to the negotiation table. That's why he can be AVOIDED by the "stars".. and why he got his title robbed off him messing about trying to defend in Scotland.

    Like Ice.. I too would back Guzman all day long to beat Pac. Fact.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-18-2008, 09:50 PM
  2. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 05-07-2008, 11:15 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-22-2007, 02:09 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing