Thread: Does this referee have his own agenda or did he....

Handle this round correctly and imparsially.

I AM NOT DEBATING THE OUTCOME OR THE FIGHTERS JUST THE REFF:


http://youtube.com/watch?v=qkssF47xi...eature=related

http://youtube.com/watch?v=qkssF47xi...eature=related

http://youtube.com/watch?v=qkssF47xi...eature=related

we meant to imagine the ref and what fight?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=qkssF47xioQ

Acting strange wont let me post video until someone has replyed to thread.

Anyway 8 warnings in the 1st minute of the first round and i didnt see any infraction.

He does seem to be on Ruiz case from the start.

But hardly surprising.. over the years Nady has consistently proven himself to be a complete wanker. Fact.

who wouldnt wanna be on ruiz`s case

Everybody hates ruiz dont they

Originally Posted by Fenster

He does seem to be on Ruiz case from the start.

But hardly surprising.. over the years Nady has consistently proven himself to be a complete wanker. Fact.

I still haven't forgave him for robbing my boy Barrera against Marquez regarding the Knockdown

But who was that ref in the Telesco vs Jones fight that told them to stop talking ?? that made me giggle i think it was Arthur Mercante ?? he is biased as hell, he deducted a point from Quartey for holding Carr around the neck if i remember right, when that was the first time he had done it in the whole fight and hadn't had any warnings before that, then the commentator made a comment and said Ali done that about 500 times against Frazier and he never took one point away from him or never even warned him, thats true as well.

Originally Posted by Fenster

He does seem to be on Ruiz case from the start.

But hardly surprising.. over the years Nady has consistently proven himself to be a complete wanker. Fact.

I just read on another forum that between Cortez and Nady handle a bout on 91% of all LV HBO cards and 94% of every PPV card.

My question is......... why when they are clearly inept?

Originally Posted by hattonthehammer

who wouldnt wanna be on ruiz`s case

Everybody hates ruiz dont they

A referee shouldnt go into a bout with a pre determind view on a fighter, ok Ruiz has a history of holding but that shouldnt come into it Ruiz should be judged on what happened in the fight, its clear from the start Nady has his agenda.

Roy would still have beat him he is a great fighter i just think the slim chance Ruiz had was stolen from him.

Even Ruiz said himself that took him out of his game plan a little, who do you think HBO wanted to win? Not f'in John Ruiz thats for sure. Jones won that fight hands down, but who knows if Ruiz was allowed to bearhug/maul tactic what would have happened. I don't like Nady as a ref, he always seems biased to one fighter.

He warns Ruiz for leading with the head, then 2 seconds later Roy Jones leads with the head, and nothing is said. Nady is fucking retarded, just look at his face and you know he's stupid.

That is what a good corner can do. Prior to the fight convince the ref that fighter x is going to cheat, and when the fight starts fighter x is going to get more scrutiny.

For John Ruiz, whose style was based on cheating(punch and clutch) this spells bad news.

Originally Posted by lance Uppercut

That is what a good corner can do. Prior to the fight convince the ref that fighter x is going to cheat, and when the fight starts fighter x is going to get more scrutiny.

For John Ruiz, whose style was based on cheating(punch and clutch) this spells bad news.

Look who Ruiz had in his corner im sure they would have made it clear, ive got this picture of Nady smoking a cigar sniffing Jones gym shorts when the door goes he quicky throws them under his seat.

You dont think Nady was going to let Ruiz get in the way of the all American, history making, goldenboy do you?