Thread: Is Prizefighter Tournament Fixed

What i've seen in tonights lightheavyweight Prizefighter tournament makes me sick.The bookmakers are handing out back handers to the judges and promoter for sure here.Its soo obvious.I smelt a rat as soon as i lost out when i put a bet on Nigel Wright to win the welterweight division of the series!!



Is it a Con or what folks?I think it is!!!

Please someone make a poll on this matter,it'll be interesting to see the overall percentage to the question!Thanks!

So nobody else thinks this tournament could be fixed by the greedy bookmakers?I've mentioned it months ago that i think it is and it even proved more soo last night as for you's who watched it noticed that the favourite"Tony Oaky"won the tournament out right after beaten the well worth fighter of the night"Stubbs".Oaky was supposed to have fought the unbeaten,taller,rangerer fighter Dilks in the final.But it was'nt to be was it after the judges change their minds (after recieving a back hander from the bookmakers)all of a sudden after 10minutes of the semi final.It was fixed.Oaky deserved to win,dont get me wrong,but Dilks was robbed of the chance to fight him in the final.For me Dilks would have won it as well!!I hope DILKs make a appeal against this matter.Same happen to Nigel Wright when he fought Lomax at the semi finals of the welterweight tournament last year!

the scoring through out IMO was poor

in dilks' first fight one judge had all three round to him and there is no way he won the third

Not seen it yet I SKY+ it.

I think your right, from the other Prizefighters I have watched. The betting is always dodgy just like the judging.

Yvonne the scoring was abosute sh*t however i do think Oakey was the winner his tyle is made for this comp but the scoring for the rest was terrible it reminded me of wrestling years ago when it was pre-arranged. Nigel Wright incident was the worst i have seen don´t know if i will watch again

Originally Posted by chip

Yvonne the scoring was abosute sh*t however i do think Oakey was the winner his tyle is made for this comp but the scoring for the rest was terrible it reminded me of wrestling years ago when it was pre-arranged. Nigel Wright incident was the worst i have seen don´t know if i will watch again

Its a great new tournament thought by Hearn.The fact that some low rated boxer could make a big break through this tournament is very good at first but now i feel that there's too much involment with the bookmakers now.I mean the odds change all the time during the tournament soo in a way the bookmakers could easly change the outcome of the final fight just by calculate the percentage of the punters money and take it from there of who'll win or lose!!!We seen it again last night.If the proposed final fight was against Oaky vs Dilks it would have been close but i would expect Dilks to win!!!In other words the bookmakers would have lost a lot of profit!Its put me off the tournament now for sure.I thought it was a great tournament at first!There's far too many Prizefighters tournaments now.Their of just had at least two competitions throughout the year!!

Calm down yvonne

The bookies LOSE when the favourites win. Oakey was BIG favourite over BOTH those guys. The bookies would have needed Oakey to lose for them to win.

The scoring incident was clearly a big embarrassing fuck up. I'm sure no one involved wanted it to happen.

Originally Posted by Fenster

Calm down yvonne

The bookies LOSE when the favourites win. Oakey was BIG favourite over BOTH those guys. The bookies would have needed Oakey to lose for them to win.

The scoring incident was clearly a big embarrassing fuck up. I'm sure no one involved wanted it to happen.

I beg to differ mate!With the odds and percentages changing throughout the fights as well as rounds i still strongly feel theres something dodgy going on behind the scenes for sure.I bet the odds for Dilks to win the tournament out-right where better than Oaky's!There's too many fook ups in this copetition now and its nothing to do with the fighters,its between the judges.Are these judges real judges or are their micky mouse??Their cant count and cant see a winning fighter either.Them two elements that true counts to judge a fight and their cant even do that

Im not happy,i feel sorry for the fighters really.You have Wright who was robbed"He made an appeal!!!"and there's DILKS"He's making a appeal"Soo that says it all!!

can't comment on that particular fight as I skipped out to watch John Mugabi, came back to hear of the confusion. Hell even I can count to 30.

Best part of that show was seeing Barrera look in good shape