Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilbo  Quote:
Originally Posted by Rican Tito was definitely more devastating and thrilling than Oscar. After a while, Oscar fought the likes of Gatti, a past his prime Chavez, an already beaten by Trinidad Vargas AND Mayorga, etc. And Oscar has lost more megafights than Tito (see Mosley twice, Floyd, Hopkins) and always ducked Wright. So although Oscar has won belts in many different divisions, Tito has been the most consistently exciting, devastating, and thrilling than Oscar. | The difference for me though is that Oscar was always competitive in his fights, and a couple of those he lost many thought he won.
He was never embarrassed the way Tito was against Winky.
But I agree Tito is an all time great. I thought he lost to Oscar which is why I probably favour Oscar. Tito although an offensive powerhouse was a little one dimensional at times. |
He was never embarassed by a winky, but he never fought a winky
. Their careers are very similar in terms of results against the same opponents(and against each other), so I'd have it a dead heat.