Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Is it bad for RIgondeaux to have Roach as a trainer?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1441
    Cool Clicks

    Default Is it bad for RIgondeaux to have Roach as a trainer?

    At first I thought it was a great matchup, but more and more I begin to think that Rigondeaux isn't getting as many fights as quickly as he should, and I can't help but feel its because Roach trains so many high profile fighters and doesn't have the time to properly and specifically train Guillermo. I mean he went pro like 8 months ago, and he's had 3 fights so far...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,604
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1533
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is it bad for RIgondeaux to have Roach as a trainer?

    I don't think it really makes a difference. The main thing with these defecters is making sure thier new free lifestyle in the states doesn't cause thier boxing career to suffer. Rigondeaux is no spring chicken and just like gamboa he is who he is . Roach or nobody else is really going to teach him much of anything new that he will actually use in the ring.
    Hidden Content Click clack ! Give up the purse.........or yetti will find you.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2482
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is it bad for RIgondeaux to have Roach as a trainer?

    Hmm, is this is a promotional problem though?

    On the other point, fair enough, Roach does train a fair amount of fighters

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is it bad for RIgondeaux to have Roach as a trainer?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mar View Post
    I don't think it really makes a difference. The main thing with these defecters is making sure thier new free lifestyle in the states doesn't cause thier boxing career to suffer. Rigondeaux is no spring chicken and just like gamboa he is who he is . Roach or nobody else is really going to teach him much of anything new that he will actually use in the ring.
    This.

    Rigondeaux has all the technical skill he needs, having Roach in his corner will help his popularity, because Roach himself is a celebrity at this point. A few pointers here and there, are all he really needs as far as skills go. It's not like Craig McEwan who really has a lot to learn skill wise. Rigondeaux is already there.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Va, USA
    Posts
    982
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1065
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is it bad for RIgondeaux to have Roach as a trainer?

    I am not completely sold on Rigondeaux having all the skills he needs. He certainly has the tools. I think anyone could tell you can't throw him in with a world class opponent, because he hasn't had to dig or face adversity. Gamboa/JMLopez has faced adversity (Jiminez, Ramirez.. early) but didn't really need to dig.

    And from a promotional standpoint it's going to be anything but easy to get this guy where he wants to be in a couple years. 3 fights in 8 months is ok at this point. These fights are only there to build confidence. Establish a record, maintain, & train. (Nothing like what Gamboa is doing) Freddie will get him straight.
    "Floyd needs to inject Xylocaine into his balls to gain the courage to fight Pacquiao."

    - and I quote from some random guy on the internet

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is it bad for RIgondeaux to have Roach as a trainer?

    Quote Originally Posted by JonnyFolds View Post
    I am not completely sold on Rigondeaux having all the skills he needs. He certainly has the tools. I think anyone could tell you can't throw him in with a world class opponent, because he hasn't had to dig or face adversity. Gamboa/JMLopez has faced adversity (Jiminez, Ramirez.. early) but didn't really need to dig.

    And from a promotional standpoint it's going to be anything but easy to get this guy where he wants to be in a couple years. 3 fights in 8 months is ok at this point. These fights are only there to build confidence. Establish a record, maintain, & train. (Nothing like what Gamboa is doing) Freddie will get him straight.
    I don't know what other skill you expect from him? Can you explain that please.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1441
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is it bad for RIgondeaux to have Roach as a trainer?

    Quote Originally Posted by JonnyFolds View Post
    I am not completely sold on Rigondeaux having all the skills he needs. He certainly has the tools. I think anyone could tell you can't throw him in with a world class opponent, because he hasn't had to dig or face adversity. Gamboa/JMLopez has faced adversity (Jiminez, Ramirez.. early) but didn't really need to dig.

    And from a promotional standpoint it's going to be anything but easy to get this guy where he wants to be in a couple years. 3 fights in 8 months is ok at this point. These fights are only there to build confidence. Establish a record, maintain, & train. (Nothing like what Gamboa is doing) Freddie will get him straight.
    Mayweather didn't face real adversity until he faced Castillo, and he was already the unified 130 pound before then. Roy didn't face any adveristy until he fought MOntell Griffin at 175(at which point he had already won titles at 3 weight classes).

    My problem with him being with ROach is 1. Roach wasn't even in his corner for one of his fights which didn't really matter, but still Roach would choose Pacquiao and Khan over him everytime until they get derailed, Khan is too popular and is a lot yougner than Rigondeaux, while Pacquiao is Pacquiao. I think training wise Roach is an excellent trainer, but I think Rigondeaux should be getting in the ring a lot more, I mean he's been hit like twice cleanly as a proffesional in 3 fights, he has hardly at to do anything in all three of his fights.

    I think Rigondeaux would beat JML or Gamboa relatively easily considering how good they are. After watching Lopez's second last fight I think Rigondeaux movement and counter punching would completely befuddle him, and Gamboa makes way too many mistakes and a guy the same speed as him with Guillermo's accurate punching would eat him alive.
    Last edited by Taeth; 10-30-2009 at 10:06 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    87
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    783
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is it bad for RIgondeaux to have Roach as a trainer?

    It isn't easy getting Rigondeaux the fights he needs. He's only had three of them so far, and just because he's world class already that doesn't mean he can generate the kind of money yet that would secure a solid opponent. It's like fighting a huge name fighter with big time skill, but getting minimum reward. If you are going to fight someone that good you want to get paid. One of his opponents pulled out because he googled Rigondeaux and found out who he was!
    To the brave belong all things.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1008
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is it bad for RIgondeaux to have Roach as a trainer?

    It can never be bad to have Roach by your side; The guy has no family and is 100% devoted to boxing and we've seen that he's performing with any kind of different fighters to get the best out of them. If he doesn't have enough fight, it is a promoting matter, the trainer brings the best in the fighter but doesn't decide about the matchmaking (for mere trainer at least).
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1385
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is it bad for RIgondeaux to have Roach as a trainer?

    I think it will be the next big duo in boxing. Well, that depends on Freddie's Parkinsons.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-10-2009, 05:24 AM
  2. Roach to coach Rigondeaux!!!
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-11-2009, 06:53 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing