Originally Posted by captainanddew

isn't there something like 10 "champs" in alot of divisions.

Forget the trinkets.

Recognize the Ring magazine belt. Anything else is pretty much bullshit.

I agree about the belts, but Trout is very talented! He just recently signed with Haymon also so he should get the opportunities to prove it

Originally Posted by captainanddew

isn't there something like 10 "champs" in alot of divisions.

Forget the trinkets.

Recognize the Ring magazine belt. Anything else is pretty much bullshit.

Ah. The Ring Magazine. In the past it was fantastic. But as of recently, it's shit. They've got a bunch of idiots in there. Trust me, they're not that great anymore.

But yeah. One belt would be great.

Originally Posted by Slim the BoxingManiac

Originally Posted by captainanddew

isn't there something like 10 "champs" in alot of divisions.

Forget the trinkets.

Recognize the Ring magazine belt. Anything else is pretty much bullshit.

Ah. The Ring Magazine. In the past it was fantastic. But as of recently, it's shit. They've got a bunch of idiots in there. Trust me, they're not that great anymore.

But yeah. One belt would be great.

I think The Ring should have kept Collins on, he was really good for the sport imo

I think the guys there are passionate, but need to slow things down a bit at times. They removed both Huck & Maidana from the ratings but both returned to the divisions. The Huck removal caused some to question the legitimacy of the Hernandez/ Cunningham as for the championship. I was alright with it though as Cunningham had already beaten Huck. Plus they returned Maidana to to the ratings.

Fisher gets to involved sometimes in his dislike for Floyd, I don't mind most of it cause its pretty much on the button, but he should just let it go sometimes instead of trying to argue with some of these retard fans, makes him look unprofessional & petty...

But I think the Ring staff are keen to fill championship vacancy's & keep the sport moving forward in a good light. I think the Ring has slipped a little since the change in editors but I think its working on improving going forward

Originally Posted by Galaxy

Originally Posted by Slim the BoxingManiac

Originally Posted by captainanddew

isn't there something like 10 "champs" in alot of divisions.

Forget the trinkets.

Recognize the Ring magazine belt. Anything else is pretty much bullshit.

Ah. The Ring Magazine. In the past it was fantastic. But as of recently, it's shit. They've got a bunch of idiots in there. Trust me, they're not that great anymore.

But yeah. One belt would be great.

I think The Ring should have kept Collins on, he was really good for the sport imo

I think the guys there are passionate, but need to slow things down a bit at times. They removed both Huck & Maidana from the ratings but both returned to the divisions. The Huck removal caused some to question the legitimacy of the Hernandez/ Cunningham as for the championship. I was alright with it though as Cunningham had already beaten Huck. Plus they returned Maidana to to the ratings.

Fisher gets to involved sometimes in his dislike for Floyd, I don't mind most of it cause its pretty much on the button, but he should just let it go sometimes instead of trying to argue with some of these retard fans, makes him look unprofessional & petty...

But I think the Ring staff are keen to fill championship vacancy's & keep the sport moving forward in a good light. I think the Ring has slipped a little since the change in editors but I think its working on improving going forward

I saw the all time rankings from them a while back, and it physically disgusted me. I vomited all over Southern Calcutta in its entirety.

Bleh.