Thread: Damn if you do Damn if you Dont

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

Because people hate, people by the hype, u say something offensive about their fighter, they say something offensive about yours, i personally love floyd and pac, i don't think neither is scared, u don't get to the top by being scared and lacking confidence, pacqious is impressive, and so is maywaether, and if you don't think so, name a guy you think stands a chance?

Originally Posted by Boxer4life

Because people hate, people by the hype, u say something offensive about their fighter, they say something offensive about yours, i personally love floyd and pac, i don't think neither is scared, u don't get to the top by being scared and lacking confidence, pacqious is impressive, and so is maywaether, and if you don't think so, name a guy you think stands a chance?

i agree, this two are meant for each other. if they fight anybody else aside from each other they are going tobe criticized regardless.

and i think it will be a competitive enough fight to go for the rematch

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

He hasn't passed a blood test.

For that reason I think the same as I do for any athlete that hasn't passed a random blood test.

More than likely on roids.

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

He hasn't passed a blood test.

For that reason I think the same as I do for any athlete that hasn't passed a random blood test.

More than likely on roids.

And you also honestly think that he is on A-side Meth which makes him bullet proof.

Originally Posted by brucelee

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

He hasn't passed a blood test.

For that reason I think the same as I do for any athlete that hasn't passed a random blood test.

More than likely on roids.

And you also honestly think that he is on A-side Meth which makes him bullet proof.

Yeah quote me where I said that

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

Who has said Pacquiao's last 6 victories weren't impressive? If they did then they are retarded. The only one I didn't like was Margarito because he wasn't sharp enough.

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

He hasn't passed a blood test.

For that reason I think the same as I do for any athlete that hasn't passed a random blood test.

More than likely on roids.

Then by definition all pro boxers are cheaters because their is no random testing in pro boxing?

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

This makes absolutely no sense.

1) There is nobody who says his last 6 victories were not impressive. I challenge you to produce a quip of someone saying that.

2) An unimpressive boxing performance automatically clears someone from PED usage? Come on.

Originally Posted by IamInuit

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

He hasn't passed a blood test.

For that reason I think the same as I do for any athlete that hasn't passed a random blood test.

More than likely on roids.

Then by definition all pro boxers are cheaters because their is no random testing in pro boxing?

All pro boxers who haven't passed a random blood test have a question mark over their head in my book.

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Originally Posted by IamInuit

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

He hasn't passed a blood test.

For that reason I think the same as I do for any athlete that hasn't passed a random blood test.

More than likely on roids.

Then by definition all pro boxers are cheaters because their is no random testing in pro boxing?

All pro boxers who haven't passed a random blood test have a question mark over their head in my book.

So lets just dump the Hall of Fame and all great fighters from the history books cause they may have cheated?

Originally Posted by Taeth

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

Who has said Pacquiao's last 6 victories weren't impressive? If they did then they are retarded. The only one I didn't like was Margarito because he wasn't sharp enough.

speaking of Cheato the guy has a retached retina courtesy of PAC.

Boxing - Antonio Margarito Update

Antonio Margarito Update

By Gabriel F. Cordero
A proposed grudge rematch between Antonio Margarito and Miguel Cotto is on the shelf for the moment. In addition to the broken orbital socket Margarito suffered in his brutal loss to Manny Pacquiao last November, “The Tijuana Tornado” also suffered a detached retina in that fight. The injury could force Margarito to retire from the sport.

Originally Posted by IamInuit

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Originally Posted by IamInuit

Originally Posted by Hornfinger

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

He hasn't passed a blood test.

For that reason I think the same as I do for any athlete that hasn't passed a random blood test.

More than likely on roids.

Then by definition all pro boxers are cheaters because their is no random testing in pro boxing?

All pro boxers who haven't passed a random blood test have a question mark over their head in my book.

So lets just dump the Hall of Fame and all great fighters from the history books cause they may have cheated?

Yeah because in the old days of ali frazier and sugar ray robinson they had the advanced steroids and testosterone boosters that can only be detected by blood testing that we have today that were only developed in the last decade or so.

What a rediculously uneducated thing to say. More than half the hall of fame were fighting in a time before steroids were even thought of let alone invented

Originally Posted by Beanflicker

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Pacs last 6 victories are not impressive according to some something that is not a feat. If that is the case then why do they think Pac is on Peds?

This makes absolutely no sense.

1) There is nobody who says his last 6 victories were not impressive. I challenge you to produce a quip of someone saying that.

2) An unimpressive boxing performance automatically clears someone from PED usage? Come on.

Mayweather Sr on Roach "He's an average trainer training an average fighter' - Jackson Fight Sports | Examiner.com

well not verbatimly but along those lines. My point is the only way you would assume someone is using Peds is something out of the ordinary performance took place. Would you assume someone average at best