Boxing Forums

.
.



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7
PAC-JMM Compubox
Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Pavlik is offline Baggins Clan Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,762
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    731
    Cool Clicks
    38

    Default PAC-JMM Compubox

    Anybody? Pls post.
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

  2. #2
    CFH
    CFH is offline Pogue mahone Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,679
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3911
    Cool Clicks
    412

    Default Re: PAC-JMM Compubox

    I believe that had Pacquiao throwing more and landing more, but Marquez landing a higher percentage.

    I think it was something like 180-130.

  3. #3
    Pavlik is offline Baggins Clan Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,762
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    731
    Cool Clicks
    38

    Default Re: PAC-JMM Compubox

    Pacquiao beats Marquez by controversial decision - Boxing - Yahoo! Sports

    According to CompuBox, Pacquiao landed 176 of 578 punches. Marquez connected on 138 of 436 punches, preferring, as in his first two fights, to counter punch. Pacquiao had a 117-100 edge in power shots.

    thanks CFH
    [SIGPIC]
    Hidden Content

  4. #4
    Gandalf is offline Forum Greatest Of All Time Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    37,844
    Mentioned
    340 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2872
    Cool Clicks
    1176

    Default Re: PAC-JMM Compubox

    Those numbers seem a bit iffy to me. Regardless, the rounds which Marquez took were relatively easy to score and there were a lot of them.

  5. #5
    captainanddew is offline Forum Greatest Of All Time Array
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,001
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    308
    Cool Clicks
    63

    Default Re: PAC-JMM Compubox

    I used to be a boxing fan who would use compubox until I have seen it be rather bad. 2 examples:

    kirkland/angulo- angulo was 37 of 74 in the first round.

    Just for fun(and that first round was great fun to replay multiple times) I counted the number of punches that Angulo threw from the second Kirkland got up from the knockdown till the 1:08 mark of round 1. It was over 80. Add in the 18-20 Angulo threw before Kirkland went down, and the few punches Angulo attemped in the final 1:08 of hte round and compubox was only off by about 30 or so punches.

    Their punch stats missed 30 or so punches.

    For the Haye vs Valuev fight, they had Haye throwing 144 punches or 12 punches a round. So if a guy only throws 12 punches a round you would figure they would be pretty damn accurate. Well, a coouple of people actually watched the fight and counted and they were off. Haye threw 13 punches a round. So in a fight where a guy threw 13 punches per round (which is so few my 4 yr old son could count them), compubox was off by 12 total punches. That is pretty pathetic.

  6. #6
    djcione is offline Forum Amature Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    California and Philippines
    Posts
    86
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    355
    Cool Clicks
    0

    Default Re: PAC-JMM Compubox

    Compu Box is for amateur fights; means practically nothing significant in pros.

  7. #7
    arcanum26 is offline Forum Contender Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    223
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    373
    Cool Clicks
    28

    Default Re: PAC-JMM Compubox

    If the fight goes to a decision, the compubox stats won't really matter that much. One guy could potentially out punch the other fighter 100 to 1 in one round but if the other rounds he gets out punched 10 to 1 he'd still get outpointed. Theoretically if the fight I mentioned is a 4 rounder, the compubox stats would be 104 to 44. Guess what though, the guy who scored 44 punches would still win the fight based on a per round basis.
    Sorry, I'm a bit drunk so if the math goes wrong I know I messed up. Hopefully I made my point.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Unlocking Compubox
    By fan johnny in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-19-2009, 02:46 PM
  2. Punch stat report from Compubox
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-25-2009, 06:33 PM
  3. Whoever was compubox recorded was retarded
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-20-2008, 11:27 PM
  4. Compubox For Casamayor fight.
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 11-15-2007, 08:15 PM
  5. Compubox??
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-25-2007, 07:36 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  





Boxing Hompage | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Video Clips | Boxing Forum | Boxing Downloads| Boxing Twitter | Boxing Books | Boxing Posters | Learn to Box | Advanced Fighting Methods | Boxing Quiz | Boxing Rankings | Boxing Schedule | Betting Odds | Boxers Records | Auctions | Fun and Games | Articles on Boxing | World News | Earn Money from your Website | Boxing Equipment

Copyright © 2000 - 2016 Saddo Boxing - Disclaimer l Boxing