Very interesting to see the round-by-round.
Round 5 is the only round that the official judges gave to Bradley that none of the WBO scores gave to him. Not sure this really validates Pacquiao. I thought Pacquiao won 8-4, but the fact that you can piece together a 7-5 Bradley scorecard from among the WBO reviewers seems to weigh against the robbery/corruption claim quite a bit.
And they mean what to this? The decision stands and it will stay that way. I do hear John McCain is working on something to clean up the sport and decisions like this in the future. But I have heard and read stuff like this before.
maineventboxing.wordpress.com - my mates boxing blog, check it out for fight articles and fight predictions
Gentleman 1 judge had it 7-5
The others were
I think this vid pretty much explains it all
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
It still doesn't change anything expect that Bradley can now be stripped of the belt.
Just out of curiosity, what is the take of the you two with regards to that Pacquiao-Marquez III fight?
Last edited by InTheNeutralCorner; 06-21-2012 at 04:44 AM.
so even with the 5 different judges they only agreed that 5 of the 12 rounds were clearly Pacquiao's?! if anything they justified the decision rather than discredited it
I recall that your round by round score for that fight also did not agree with the rest who claim that fight is a robbery yet you still insisted that is a robbery. Did it change now?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)