Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 96

Thread: Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN First

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN First


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,956
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    966
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing.

    Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter.

    There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination.

    If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse.
    Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1290
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN F

    Since the fight was discussed 3 or 4 years ago, I never had any doubt in my mind that Mayweather would whip this guy. Floyd's speed, defense and counter punching would be absolute poison for Manny.

    I think most people know this too, it's just they hate Mayweather SO much that they predict with their hearts and not with their brains.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3056
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN F

    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing.

    Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter.

    There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination.

    If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse.
    Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks.
    If you want to judge them by common opponents then Manny is above Floyd.

    He beat Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and Mosley more impressively than Floyd did.

    Having close fights with a great like Marquez is nothing to be ashamed about. Floyd had two close fights with Castillo, arguably losing the first in many peoples eyes.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,956
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    966
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing.

    Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter.

    There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination.

    If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse.
    Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks.
    If you want to judge them by common opponents then Manny is above Floyd.

    He beat Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and Mosley more impressively than Floyd did.

    Having close fights with a great like Marquez is nothing to be ashamed about. Floyd had two close fights with Castillo, arguably losing the first in many peoples eyes.
    I think the hatton, oscar cotto and moseley that floyd fought were at a far better stage and weight as when they fought manny.

    Obviously, im going to side with floyd and dont want to hijack the thread by talking about manny and floyds opponents but you wisely brought them up.

    Floyd:-

    Hatton-undefeated.(was never the same after floyd)

    Oscar-his weight, his ring, his gloves, his rules.

    Mosely:- after beating margacheato, no one wanted to fight him, even offered to do a catchweight with manny.

    Cotto:- at his weight and not after a loss.

    Weight makes all the difference.

    Manny is great fighter but those common opponents were all at a disadvantage when fighting manny.
    Last edited by imp; 12-03-2012 at 04:30 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,956
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    966
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Since the fight was discussed 3 or 4 years ago, I never had any doubt in my mind that Mayweather would whip this guy. Floyd's speed, defense and counter punching would be absolute poison for Manny.

    I think most people know this too, it's just they hate Mayweather SO much that they predict with their hearts and not with their brains.
    This statement pretty much sums everything up.

    Well done.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,053
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1947
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN F

    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing.

    Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter.

    There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination.

    If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse.
    Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks.
    If you want to judge them by common opponents then Manny is above Floyd.

    He beat Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and Mosley more impressively than Floyd did.

    Having close fights with a great like Marquez is nothing to be ashamed about. Floyd had two close fights with Castillo, arguably losing the first in many peoples eyes.
    I think the hatton, oscar cotto and moseley that floyd fought were at a far better stage and weight as when they fought manny.

    Obviously, im going to side with floyd and dont want to hijack the thread by talking about manny and floyds opponents but you wisely brought them up.

    Floyd:-

    Hatton-undefeated.(was never the same after floyd)

    Oscar-his weight, his ring, his gloves, his rules.

    Mosely:- after beating margacheato, no one wanted to fight him, even offered to do a catchweight with manny.

    Cotto:- at his weight and not after a loss.

    Weight makes all the difference.

    Manny is great fighter but those common opponents were all at a disadvantage when fighting manny.


    The Cotto that fought Pacquaio had a corner that had no clue as to how to put together a fight plan for Pacquiao. The Cotto that fought Floyd had Pedro Diaz in his corner, and the very best fight plan and conditioning to try and beat Floyd. Obviously it didn't work. That Cotto would've beaten Pac, IMO.

    The Oscar that lost to Pac was a weight-drained, over-the-hill Oscar... looking for one more under-sized, famous scalp so he could ride off triumphantly into the sunset. It backfired in his face. The Oscar that lost to Floyd was much younger, closer to prime, and not weight-drained, fighting at 154.

    The Mosley that fought Floyd was just coming off a crushing win over Margacheato, as mentioned by imp. His fight with Pac was later and toward the end of his career.

    Hatton I won't include, because Hatton was in tip-top condition and said he was fighting for the world's p4p. Besides, he fought Floyd at 147, a weight he was NEVER comfortable at. He fought Pac at 140. Pac definitely put more of an exclamation point on his KTFO victory over Hatton than Floyd did.

    Still, regardless of how each did against common opponents, Floyd beats the living daylights out of Pac if they were to meet today.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3056
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN F

    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing.

    Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter.

    There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination.

    If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse.
    Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks.
    If you want to judge them by common opponents then Manny is above Floyd.

    He beat Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and Mosley more impressively than Floyd did.

    Having close fights with a great like Marquez is nothing to be ashamed about. Floyd had two close fights with Castillo, arguably losing the first in many peoples eyes.
    I think the hatton, oscar cotto and moseley that floyd fought were at a far better stage and weight as when they fought manny.

    Obviously, im going to side with floyd and dont want to hijack the thread by talking about manny and floyds opponents but you wisely brought them up.

    Floyd:-

    Hatton-undefeated.(was never the same after floyd)

    Oscar-his weight, his ring, his gloves, his rules.

    Mosely:- after beating margacheato, no one wanted to fight him, even offered to do a catchweight with manny.

    Cotto:- at his weight and not after a loss.

    Weight makes all the difference.

    Manny is great fighter but those common opponents were all at a disadvantage when fighting manny.
    Weight makes all the difference?

    Manny fought Marquez at 126, 130 and both weighing 142.

    Floyd fought Marquez once at welterweight with a big size advantage. Marquez dropped back to 135 immediately following the fight.

    Clearly Marquez had a big disadvantage against Floyd, so comparing Pac/Floyd where Marquez is concerned is pointless?
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3056
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN F

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing.

    Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter.

    There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination.

    If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse.
    Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks.
    If you want to judge them by common opponents then Manny is above Floyd.

    He beat Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and Mosley more impressively than Floyd did.

    Having close fights with a great like Marquez is nothing to be ashamed about. Floyd had two close fights with Castillo, arguably losing the first in many peoples eyes.
    I think the hatton, oscar cotto and moseley that floyd fought were at a far better stage and weight as when they fought manny.

    Obviously, im going to side with floyd and dont want to hijack the thread by talking about manny and floyds opponents but you wisely brought them up.

    Floyd:-

    Hatton-undefeated.(was never the same after floyd)

    Oscar-his weight, his ring, his gloves, his rules.

    Mosely:- after beating margacheato, no one wanted to fight him, even offered to do a catchweight with manny.

    Cotto:- at his weight and not after a loss.

    Weight makes all the difference.

    Manny is great fighter but those common opponents were all at a disadvantage when fighting manny.


    The Cotto that fought Pacquaio had a corner that had no clue as to how to put together a fight plan for Pacquiao. The Cotto that fought Floyd had Pedro Diaz in his corner, and the very best fight plan and conditioning to try and beat Floyd. Obviously it didn't work. That Cotto would've beaten Pac, IMO.

    The Oscar that lost to Pac was a weight-drained, over-the-hill Oscar... looking for one more under-sized, famous scalp so he could ride off triumphantly into the sunset. It backfired in his face. The Oscar that lost to Floyd was much younger, closer to prime, and not weight-drained, fighting at 154.

    The Mosley that fought Floyd was just coming off a crushing win over Margacheato, as mentioned by imp. His fight with Pac was later and toward the end of his career.

    Hatton I won't include, because Hatton was in tip-top condition and said he was fighting for the world's p4p. Besides, he fought Floyd at 147, a weight he was NEVER comfortable at. He fought Pac at 140. Pac definitely put more of an exclamation point on his KTFO victory over Hatton than Floyd did.

    Still, regardless of how each did against common opponents, Floyd beats the living daylights out of Pac if they were to meet today.
    You can make excuses for any losing fighter.

    Floyd may well beat Pac. But judging them on common opponents then Pac is his superior. Fact.

    Pac KO'd Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and has beaten Mosley and Marquez knocking them both down.

    Floyd won on points against Cotto, Mosley, Oscar, Marquez and KO'd Hatton eight rounds after Pac did it.

    It's no comparison. Pac over Floyd.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1245
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN F

    @Fenster and @imp - there's arguments on both sides, as to who did better against common opposition.

    I like Floyd over Manny. Styles make fights. Bottom line. It's tired though at this point. That said, I would prefer to see Sergio Martinez against Floyd at 154, or above.

    Guerrero for Floyd, and Rios for Manny, neither fight does much for me.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,053
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1947
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN F

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing.

    Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter.

    There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination.

    If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse.
    Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks.
    If you want to judge them by common opponents then Manny is above Floyd.

    He beat Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and Mosley more impressively than Floyd did.

    Having close fights with a great like Marquez is nothing to be ashamed about. Floyd had two close fights with Castillo, arguably losing the first in many peoples eyes.
    I think the hatton, oscar cotto and moseley that floyd fought were at a far better stage and weight as when they fought manny.

    Obviously, im going to side with floyd and dont want to hijack the thread by talking about manny and floyds opponents but you wisely brought them up.

    Floyd:-

    Hatton-undefeated.(was never the same after floyd)

    Oscar-his weight, his ring, his gloves, his rules.

    Mosely:- after beating margacheato, no one wanted to fight him, even offered to do a catchweight with manny.

    Cotto:- at his weight and not after a loss.

    Weight makes all the difference.

    Manny is great fighter but those common opponents were all at a disadvantage when fighting manny.


    The Cotto that fought Pacquaio had a corner that had no clue as to how to put together a fight plan for Pacquiao. The Cotto that fought Floyd had Pedro Diaz in his corner, and the very best fight plan and conditioning to try and beat Floyd. Obviously it didn't work. That Cotto would've beaten Pac, IMO.

    The Oscar that lost to Pac was a weight-drained, over-the-hill Oscar... looking for one more under-sized, famous scalp so he could ride off triumphantly into the sunset. It backfired in his face. The Oscar that lost to Floyd was much younger, closer to prime, and not weight-drained, fighting at 154.

    The Mosley that fought Floyd was just coming off a crushing win over Margacheato, as mentioned by imp. His fight with Pac was later and toward the end of his career.

    Hatton I won't include, because Hatton was in tip-top condition and said he was fighting for the world's p4p. Besides, he fought Floyd at 147, a weight he was NEVER comfortable at. He fought Pac at 140. Pac definitely put more of an exclamation point on his KTFO victory over Hatton than Floyd did.

    Still, regardless of how each did against common opponents, Floyd beats the living daylights out of Pac if they were to meet today.
    You can make excuses for any losing fighter.

    Floyd may well beat Pac. But judging them on common opponents then Pac is his superior. Fact.

    Pac KO'd Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and has beaten Mosley and Marquez knocking them both down.

    Floyd won on points against Cotto, Mosley, Oscar, Marquez and KO'd Hatton eight rounds after Pac did it.

    It's no comparison. Pac over Floyd.


    Trevor Berbick beat Ali, who had beaten George Foreman.
    Common opponents.

    Berbick over Foreman?

    If the argument is who did better against common opponents... Pac did.
    If the argument is who would win between Pac and Floyd... Floyd would.

    Also, it's probably a bit more realistic when doing a common opponent comparison to examine the whens, hows, and other factors involved.
    Last edited by TitoFan; 12-03-2012 at 06:09 PM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,956
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    966
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing.

    Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter.

    There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination.

    If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse.
    Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks.
    If you want to judge them by common opponents then Manny is above Floyd.

    He beat Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and Mosley more impressively than Floyd did.

    Having close fights with a great like Marquez is nothing to be ashamed about. Floyd had two close fights with Castillo, arguably losing the first in many peoples eyes.
    I think the hatton, oscar cotto and moseley that floyd fought were at a far better stage and weight as when they fought manny.

    Obviously, im going to side with floyd and dont want to hijack the thread by talking about manny and floyds opponents but you wisely brought them up.

    Floyd:-

    Hatton-undefeated.(was never the same after floyd)

    Oscar-his weight, his ring, his gloves, his rules.

    Mosely:- after beating margacheato, no one wanted to fight him, even offered to do a catchweight with manny.

    Cotto:- at his weight and not after a loss.

    Weight makes all the difference.

    Manny is great fighter but those common opponents were all at a disadvantage when fighting manny.


    The Cotto that fought Pacquaio had a corner that had no clue as to how to put together a fight plan for Pacquiao. The Cotto that fought Floyd had Pedro Diaz in his corner, and the very best fight plan and conditioning to try and beat Floyd. Obviously it didn't work. That Cotto would've beaten Pac, IMO.

    The Oscar that lost to Pac was a weight-drained, over-the-hill Oscar... looking for one more under-sized, famous scalp so he could ride off triumphantly into the sunset. It backfired in his face. The Oscar that lost to Floyd was much younger, closer to prime, and not weight-drained, fighting at 154.

    The Mosley that fought Floyd was just coming off a crushing win over Margacheato, as mentioned by imp. His fight with Pac was later and toward the end of his career.

    Hatton I won't include, because Hatton was in tip-top condition and said he was fighting for the world's p4p. Besides, he fought Floyd at 147, a weight he was NEVER comfortable at. He fought Pac at 140. Pac definitely put more of an exclamation point on his KTFO victory over Hatton than Floyd did.

    Still, regardless of how each did against common opponents, Floyd beats the living daylights out of Pac if they were to meet today.
    I agree tito.

    But to elaborate a bit on hatton, a fighter can loose there prime instantly at any time and i never saw the old hatton after the floyd fight.

    He changed trainers, taking coke behind the scenes..he wasnt the same.

    I think we can all agree floyd beat these common fighters at a better time and better weight.

    Floyd came of a 2YEAR retirement to fight the ring top dog marquez and played with..played with him!

    Manny cant deal with fighters like marquez, morales, bradley..thats his achillis heel.

    Floyd had a tough first one with castillo and considering he had a torn rotater on his left shoulder its amazing he still pulled out the win!
    Last edited by imp; 12-03-2012 at 06:49 PM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3056
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN F

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing.

    Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter.

    There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination.

    If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse.
    Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks.
    If you want to judge them by common opponents then Manny is above Floyd.

    He beat Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and Mosley more impressively than Floyd did.

    Having close fights with a great like Marquez is nothing to be ashamed about. Floyd had two close fights with Castillo, arguably losing the first in many peoples eyes.
    I think the hatton, oscar cotto and moseley that floyd fought were at a far better stage and weight as when they fought manny.

    Obviously, im going to side with floyd and dont want to hijack the thread by talking about manny and floyds opponents but you wisely brought them up.

    Floyd:-

    Hatton-undefeated.(was never the same after floyd)

    Oscar-his weight, his ring, his gloves, his rules.

    Mosely:- after beating margacheato, no one wanted to fight him, even offered to do a catchweight with manny.

    Cotto:- at his weight and not after a loss.

    Weight makes all the difference.

    Manny is great fighter but those common opponents were all at a disadvantage when fighting manny.


    The Cotto that fought Pacquaio had a corner that had no clue as to how to put together a fight plan for Pacquiao. The Cotto that fought Floyd had Pedro Diaz in his corner, and the very best fight plan and conditioning to try and beat Floyd. Obviously it didn't work. That Cotto would've beaten Pac, IMO.

    The Oscar that lost to Pac was a weight-drained, over-the-hill Oscar... looking for one more under-sized, famous scalp so he could ride off triumphantly into the sunset. It backfired in his face. The Oscar that lost to Floyd was much younger, closer to prime, and not weight-drained, fighting at 154.

    The Mosley that fought Floyd was just coming off a crushing win over Margacheato, as mentioned by imp. His fight with Pac was later and toward the end of his career.

    Hatton I won't include, because Hatton was in tip-top condition and said he was fighting for the world's p4p. Besides, he fought Floyd at 147, a weight he was NEVER comfortable at. He fought Pac at 140. Pac definitely put more of an exclamation point on his KTFO victory over Hatton than Floyd did.

    Still, regardless of how each did against common opponents, Floyd beats the living daylights out of Pac if they were to meet today.
    You can make excuses for any losing fighter.

    Floyd may well beat Pac. But judging them on common opponents then Pac is his superior. Fact.

    Pac KO'd Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and has beaten Mosley and Marquez knocking them both down.

    Floyd won on points against Cotto, Mosley, Oscar, Marquez and KO'd Hatton eight rounds after Pac did it.

    It's no comparison. Pac over Floyd.


    Trevor Berbick beat Ali, who had beaten George Foreman.
    Common opponents.

    Berbick over Foreman?

    If the argument is who did better against common opponents... Pac did.
    If the argument is who would win between Pac and Floyd... Floyd would.

    Also, it's probably a bit more realistic when doing a common opponent comparison to examine the whens, hows, and other factors involved.
    Correct. Fact.

    Who would win between Pac and Floyd is just a guess.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3056
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN F

    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing.

    Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter.

    There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination.

    If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse.
    Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks.
    If you want to judge them by common opponents then Manny is above Floyd.

    He beat Cotto, Hatton, Oscar and Mosley more impressively than Floyd did.

    Having close fights with a great like Marquez is nothing to be ashamed about. Floyd had two close fights with Castillo, arguably losing the first in many peoples eyes.
    I think the hatton, oscar cotto and moseley that floyd fought were at a far better stage and weight as when they fought manny.

    Obviously, im going to side with floyd and dont want to hijack the thread by talking about manny and floyds opponents but you wisely brought them up.

    Floyd:-

    Hatton-undefeated.(was never the same after floyd)

    Oscar-his weight, his ring, his gloves, his rules.

    Mosely:- after beating margacheato, no one wanted to fight him, even offered to do a catchweight with manny.

    Cotto:- at his weight and not after a loss.

    Weight makes all the difference.

    Manny is great fighter but those common opponents were all at a disadvantage when fighting manny.


    The Cotto that fought Pacquaio had a corner that had no clue as to how to put together a fight plan for Pacquiao. The Cotto that fought Floyd had Pedro Diaz in his corner, and the very best fight plan and conditioning to try and beat Floyd. Obviously it didn't work. That Cotto would've beaten Pac, IMO.

    The Oscar that lost to Pac was a weight-drained, over-the-hill Oscar... looking for one more under-sized, famous scalp so he could ride off triumphantly into the sunset. It backfired in his face. The Oscar that lost to Floyd was much younger, closer to prime, and not weight-drained, fighting at 154.

    The Mosley that fought Floyd was just coming off a crushing win over Margacheato, as mentioned by imp. His fight with Pac was later and toward the end of his career.

    Hatton I won't include, because Hatton was in tip-top condition and said he was fighting for the world's p4p. Besides, he fought Floyd at 147, a weight he was NEVER comfortable at. He fought Pac at 140. Pac definitely put more of an exclamation point on his KTFO victory over Hatton than Floyd did.

    Still, regardless of how each did against common opponents, Floyd beats the living daylights out of Pac if they were to meet today.
    I agree tito.

    But to elaborate a bit on hatton, a fighter can loose there prime instantly at any time and i never saw the old hatton after the floyd fight.

    He changed trainers, taking coke behind the scenes..he wasnt the same.

    I think we can all agree floyd beat these common fighters at a better time and better weight.

    Floyd came of a 2YEAR retirement to fight the ring top dog marquez and played with..played with him!

    Manny cant deal with fighters like marquez, morales, bradley..thats his achillis heel.

    Floyd had a tough first one with castillo and considering he had a torn rotater on his left shoulder its amazing he still pulled out the win!
    Considering he has two wins against Marquez, two KO victories over Morales and all popular polls show that the majority believed he was "robbed" against Bradley, he hasn't done bad against fighters he can't deal with.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    45,555
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5034
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Juan Manuel Marquez Tells Pacquiao To His Face Floyd Would Kick His Ass On ESPN F

    Marquez shouldn't be worried about what Mayweather would or wouldn't do to Manny.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-14-2012, 12:43 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-09-2011, 08:37 PM
  3. Replies: 46
    Last Post: 12-08-2010, 05:21 PM
  4. JUAN MANUEL MARQUEZ VS MANNY PACQUIAO II
    By itouchpinoy in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 11-22-2008, 10:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing