The balls on Macklin for taking this fight. Would love to travel over for it. Dont give Mack much of a chance here.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
The balls on Macklin for taking this fight. Would love to travel over for it. Dont give Mack much of a chance here.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
Oh I don't know, he surprised the crap out of me when he won a few rounds against Sergio, he can box very well. I have seen every american fight featuring GGG and I do like the guy, but something in the back of my mind that I can quite put to words is urging me caution before writing off Mack the knife.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
Of course he is going to make it an exciting fight.... nothing like seeing a tiger in captivity try to rip apart a deer that thinks there is still space to run in the wild.Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
Last edited by ykdadamaja; 04-06-2013 at 05:37 AM.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
A Golovki- Sturm/Mundine/Soliman fight would have been a bit better. jmo...
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
Brave of Macklin but only one outcome, Golovkin will KO him does he stand a chance, if WE are
all honest very little chance. Good luck to Macklin he needs all the luck he can get.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez next
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
So when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
OK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.So when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him
Mundine
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
Most of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.OK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.So when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him
Mundine
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Flat Calm and Peace Lovin
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
Most of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.OK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.So when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him
Mundine
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Uhmm...what a brilliantly objective post.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
And more importantly I ain't British. For every overrate British boxer there has been 5 overrated Anerican fighter. I'm equally critical of both.Most of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.OK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.So when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him
Mundine
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Uhmm...what a brilliantly objective post.
change me
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
Haahahahahaha. Send all three of them out to pasture cause they are done. I dont think you have even seen Macklin fight.
Super Moderator
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
True Macklin would be these guys and he will make it a tough fight for GGG.Haahahahahaha. Send all three of them out to pasture cause they are done. I dont think you have even seen Macklin fight.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
I never back a Brit, only if I think he has a chance of beating his opponent but I will wish them luck,Most of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.OK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.So when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him
Mundine
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Rees was out of his depth, as a former World Champion he was rated weather you like it or not,
he got his shot. Golovkin is a bit special in my book, Macklin has his shot as padding records go Macklin is hardly a BUM, is he a decent fighter.!
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Golovkin v Macklin June 29th
I highlight 2 quotes here and would like you to explain. Rees didnt deserve his shot? His record was 37 and 1 with 1 draw with his only loss coming by way of 12th round TKO to a decent fighter Kotelnik. He had also never been knocked down before.Most of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.OK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.So when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him
Mundine
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Crap analysis
More deserving fighters
Recycling Bums
Im more then happy to debate and have my opinion opposed but talking shit with no facts to back it up is just retarded and makes me wonder how much boxing the person watches.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks