View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 01:12 AM
Spicoli's Avatar
Spicoli Spicoli is online now
Old Guard...with gusto
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dancing on the roof shooting holes in the moon
Posts: 12,174
Punch Power: 3575
Spicoli Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classSpicoli Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classSpicoli Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classSpicoli Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classSpicoli Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classSpicoli Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classSpicoli Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classSpicoli Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classSpicoli Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classSpicoli Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classSpicoli Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of class
Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?
+3300

Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
catchweights have nothing to do with p4p rankings.

I have no problem with fighters that agree with each other fighting at whatever weight. As brought up before my only problem is the title that's on the line.
Have always thought the p4p a media frenzy...a tag line for quick consumption that is extremly subjective.A dominate and defending fighter meeting his biggest challenges in a given division is what we need. Shite....people focus on a catchweight prior to a bout but how about the actual "unofficial' weight of each fighter once the bell rings.A catchweight too and fro.