Thread: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?
View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2009, 02:16 AM
brucelee's Avatar
brucelee brucelee is offline
Pacman at 106 lbs
  

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,204
Blog Entries: 5
Punch Power: 677
brucelee Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classbrucelee Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classbrucelee Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classbrucelee Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classbrucelee Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classbrucelee Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classbrucelee Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classbrucelee Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classbrucelee Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classbrucelee Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of classbrucelee Don't mess with User or you will get KTFO... To powerful and full of class
Default Re: Can one really be ranked P4P when you demand catch weights?
Quote:
Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
I admit I did complained when I thought the titles were on the line for the catchweight,but thinking about it now people like Bilbo has a point. I just want to see great fighters fight. So a healthy weight for both at a catch weight is fine.

I mean did anyone really complain when JCC fought Whitaker at a catchweight? Or how about Hopkins and Oscar DLH? How about Pavlik-Hopkins?

In this day and age when there are so many championships per division, it really doesn't matter anymore about a title. It just lost it's luster with so many champions per division.
well said. nice point.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Ikariam