Thread: Early poll Haye v Fury

Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita

Fury gon win. Fury isn't gonna lose to a inactive, part time boxer.

Why not? He had to pick himself up off his arse and foul his way to a win against an old cruiserweight and Haye has a better pedigree than the twxi drivers that make up Fury's record.

Theres more than a remote probability that he might lose to an 'inactive, part time boxer'...

(Also, is there such a thing as an inactive full time boxer or an active part time boxer? Just curious)

Im telling you there wa sno poll options when I first posted. The name calling is because im getting pissed off of being jumped on about anything because I dare to have an opinion.

The fact I actually sipaid what I think rather than just annonymously click a poll option tells yiu the strength of my belief.

Originally Posted by AdamGB

Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita

Fury gon win. Fury isn't gonna lose to a inactive, part time boxer.

Why not? He had to pick himself up off his arse and foul his way to a win against an old cruiserweight and Haye has a better pedigree than the twxi drivers that make up Fury's record.

Theres more than a remote probability that he might lose to an 'inactive, part time boxer'...

(Also, is there such a thing as an inactive full time boxer or an active part time boxer? Just curious)

That is to his credit. Haye couldnt do the same.

Originally Posted by AdamGB

Originally Posted by ross

There was fuck all when I posted.

In fact look at mine and the thread starters post time twat.

The fact that you posted within seconds of the thread being posted just tells me that you were in too much of a hurry to repeat your moronic dribble to notice the poll.

Does the pathetic name calling add anything? Or are just upset because you've gone too far to retract the moronic predictions and analysis that you've been making, so are now stuck being ridiculed by just about everybody?

Obviously the emotionally retarded part of your brain was able to post bullshit straight away, but the logical part of your brain that deals with facts and figures couldn't bring itself to vote in a poll as quickly with something so incorrect.

Opinions are like arseholes kid, we've all got one (yours just happens to be full of shit)
Hope this helps.

Originally Posted by erics44

Originally Posted by boyla

I thought Haye look motivated at press conference.

Still going with Fury by stoppage, would be better for boxing.

Going to be a great fight.

in what way would it be better for boxing?

Haye was talking about retirement before the abysmal showing against Wladimir, nope one wants to see that again.
Vitali is past his best and should retire after Bermane Stiverne, if he does fight on it will not be against Haye.

So if Haye comes out with a win what will he do wait 9-12 months before his next bout, Fans are in no rush to fight see Wlad-Haye II after he bottled it in Hamburg.
So Haye has another 2 fights in two years, just to stay relevant, maybe he wins the WBC title after Vitali retires, he has one defense and retires himself.
Or he gets another shot against Wlad and loses again.

If you had to pick Wlad vs Haye or Fury, it has to be Fury.
Fury winning, you will see more exciting fights.
I have no doubt in Fury will take on all challenges, and if he wins the belts off Wlad it will be hilarious.
Again I don't see Vitali taking on Fury for his last bout, he shouldn't it has had a long career and he is past his best.

What will Haye do in next two years if he wins, lose against Wlad or win WBC then retire, I just don't see the exciting fights he will compete in.
Even if he takes the vacant WBC, beats Wlad I do not think he will stick around. (doubtful)

Originally Posted by ross

Originally Posted by AdamGB

Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita

Fury gon win. Fury isn't gonna lose to a inactive, part time boxer.

Why not? He had to pick himself up off his arse and foul his way to a win against an old cruiserweight and Haye has a better pedigree than the twxi drivers that make up Fury's record.

Theres more than a remote probability that he might lose to an 'inactive, part time boxer'...

(Also, is there such a thing as an inactive full time boxer or an active part time boxer? Just curious)

That is to his credit. Haye couldnt do the same.

Haye got off the floor to blast Mormeck's head off. What you on about?

Originally Posted by boyla

Originally Posted by erics44

Originally Posted by boyla

I thought Haye look motivated at press conference.

Still going with Fury by stoppage, would be better for boxing.

Going to be a great fight.

in what way would it be better for boxing?

Haye was talking about retirement before the abysmal showing against Wladimir, nope one wants to see that again.
Vitali is past his best and should retire after Bermane Stiverne, if he does fight on it will not be against Haye.

So if Haye comes out with a win what will he do wait 9-12 months before his next bout, Fans are in no rush to fight see Wlad-Haye II after he bottled it in Hamburg.
So Haye has another 2 fights in two years, just to stay relevant, maybe he wins the WBC title after Vitali retires, he has one defense and retires himself.
Or he gets another shot against Wlad and loses again.

If you had to pick Wlad vs Haye or Fury, it has to be Fury.
Fury winning, you will see more exciting fights.
I have no doubt in Fury will take on all challenges, and if he wins the belts off Wlad it will be hilarious.
Again I don't see Vitali taking on Fury for his last bout, he shouldn't it has had a long career and he is past his best.

What will Haye do in next two years if he wins, lose against Wlad or win WBC then retire, I just don't see the exciting fights he will compete in.
Even if he takes the vacant WBC, beats Wlad I do not think he will stick around. (doubtful)

if fury wins we will no doubt then have an enteraining fight against wlad with only one possible outcome

if haye wins we will probably see a few more fights involving haye and some fringe contenders before a return fight against wlad which would probably end in a win for wlad but there is much more chance of an upset

i dunno about "best for boxing" coz thats just some stupid shit boxing fans say but I would say its "best for the boxing fan" that haye wins

Originally Posted by Fenster

Originally Posted by ross

Originally Posted by AdamGB

Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita

Fury gon win. Fury isn't gonna lose to a inactive, part time boxer.

Why not? He had to pick himself up off his arse and foul his way to a win against an old cruiserweight and Haye has a better pedigree than the twxi drivers that make up Fury's record.

Theres more than a remote probability that he might lose to an 'inactive, part time boxer'...

(Also, is there such a thing as an inactive full time boxer or an active part time boxer? Just curious)

That is to his credit. Haye couldnt do the same.

Haye got off the floor to blast Mormeck's head off. What you on about?

No I mean the even older cruiser weight. The one that smashed his face in

Originally Posted by ross

Originally Posted by Fenster

Originally Posted by ross

Originally Posted by AdamGB

Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita

Fury gon win. Fury isn't gonna lose to a inactive, part time boxer.

Why not? He had to pick himself up off his arse and foul his way to a win against an old cruiserweight and Haye has a better pedigree than the twxi drivers that make up Fury's record.

Theres more than a remote probability that he might lose to an 'inactive, part time boxer'...

(Also, is there such a thing as an inactive full time boxer or an active part time boxer? Just curious)

That is to his credit. Haye couldnt do the same.

Haye got off the floor to blast Mormeck's head off. What you on about?

No I mean the even older cruiser weight. The one that smashed his face in

But you said that getting off the floor to beat a cruiserweight is something Haye couldn't do. But he did. Just not the one you were talking about. Your way of debating is very odd.

Also, Carl Thompson was a fucking good fighter and losing to him in your 11th fight, by being outlasted, is not really very shameful. Haye had to learn from that that he needed a plan B if he couldn't just blast a guy out.

It'll be a good competitive scrap while it lasts, but Fury by KO inside 7.

Originally Posted by ryanman

Originally Posted by ross

Originally Posted by Fenster

Originally Posted by ross

Originally Posted by AdamGB

Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita

Fury gon win. Fury isn't gonna lose to a inactive, part time boxer.

Why not? He had to pick himself up off his arse and foul his way to a win against an old cruiserweight and Haye has a better pedigree than the twxi drivers that make up Fury's record.

Theres more than a remote probability that he might lose to an 'inactive, part time boxer'...

(Also, is there such a thing as an inactive full time boxer or an active part time boxer? Just curious)

That is to his credit. Haye couldnt do the same.

Haye got off the floor to blast Mormeck's head off. What you on about?

No I mean the even older cruiser weight. The one that smashed his face in

But you said that getting off the floor to beat a cruiserweight is something Haye couldn't do. But he did. Just not the one you were talking about. Your way of debating is very odd.

Also, Carl Thompson was a fucking good fighter and losing to him in your 11th fight, by being outlasted, is not really very shameful. Haye had to learn from that that he needed a plan B if he couldn't just blast a guy out.

Thompson would have been a much bigger name if it werent for Hamed and Bruno hogging the headlines. If he had a full set of teeth that probably would have helped as well.

I dont know what people are talking about on this thread. It is not going to be a good exiting fight at all. Its prob gonna be on Box Office which is a joke. I just hope they get a decent undercard going.

Hold on!

A few people, el kabong was one of, said that Adamek was in the top 5 heavies..

Cunningham had just been robbed against him in his previous fight, is only 36 to Thmpsons 40! Was a genuine world champ, knocked out Marco Huck which Povetkin couldnt do and he had never been stopped!

Thompson had retired and been knocked out 5 times in his 6 losses. Haye couldnt even drop him but ex middle weight Eubank did 6 years before when Thmpson was fresher and had taken less of a beating.

Cunningham was a dangerous fight for any contender coming up. Thompsson was supposed to be a walk over and he should have been.

Originally Posted by ross

Originally Posted by AdamGB

Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita

Fury gon win. Fury isn't gonna lose to a inactive, part time boxer.

Why not? He had to pick himself up off his arse and foul his way to a win against an old cruiserweight and Haye has a better pedigree than the twxi drivers that make up Fury's record.

Theres more than a remote probability that he might lose to an 'inactive, part time boxer'...

(Also, is there such a thing as an inactive full time boxer or an active part time boxer? Just curious)

That is to his credit. Haye couldnt do the same.

Good point Ross, alot is made of the Cunningham knockdown but Fury got up to win. When Haye was the same he got dropped vs an old cruiserweight but he didnt get up to win

Still think he fights come too soon or Fury but wouldnt mind seeing him win. Hayes had hi chance and was very disappointing. Fury has more of a fighters heart so lets see how he does vs a Klitschko.

If i was a betting man Id put money on Haye

Originally Posted by ross

Hold on!

A few people, el kabong was one of, said that Adamek was in the top 5 heavies..

Cunningham had just been robbed against him in his previous fight, is only 36 to Thmpsons 40! Was a genuine world champ, knocked out Marco Huck which Povetkin couldnt do and he had never been stopped!

Thompson had retired and been knocked out 5 times in his 6 losses. Haye couldnt even drop him but ex middle weight Eubank did 6 years before when Thmpson was fresher and had taken less of a beating.

Cunningham was a dangerous fight for any contender coming up. Thompsson was supposed to be a walk over and he should have been.

So you are concluding that David Haye isn't bigger better and more experienced than when he fought Carl Thompson ?
Or what is your point ?
Im not trying to beat you down im just confused at your logic.
I understand you like Fury which is fine , but im not the only one who thinks you are blinded by this fact.