Just as a warning....once seen, you can't UN-see it. Those cat people are strange.
Cat Dancers (TV Movie 200 - IMDb
There's the IMDB link to the documentary so you can find it
Just as a warning....once seen, you can't UN-see it. Those cat people are strange.
Cat Dancers (TV Movie 200 - IMDb
There's the IMDB link to the documentary so you can find it
Oh we are going to play the "what if" game. Well what if monkies fly out of my ass and attack you? This is a lot of hand wringing over nothing. There is almost no threat of a me being attacked by a wild animal so while I wouldn't own one I don't feel the need to go run to the gov't to make sure other people can't own them. Until the time comes where lions and tiger and bears oh my are attacking people with any type of frequency and regularity I think I'll just mind my own business. You should too.
Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson
alcohol and tobacco has killed and will kill more people than wild animals or wild animals kept as pets. And alcohol and tobacco are heavily regulated.....still doesn't keep people from making moonshine which also probably kills more people than exotic pets. Guns are heavily regulated and it doesn't keep people from stealing them, acquiring them illegally, and killing other people.
Laws don't always do what they are intended to do. Also laws don't make people free or safe, laws take away freedoms and in some cases make the world LESS safe (see prohibition of alcohol and of illegal drugs)
Humans are animals.
If I lived in America I should have the right to keep one as a pet?
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
The "what if" game? Are you actually telling me that some average joe meathead owning one of the most effective, dangerous killing machines on the planet in a residential neighbourhood shouldn't be anyone's concern? I shouldn't have questions as to whether or not said meathead can properly contain a tiger? And I shouldn't have concerns about the animal's well being?
Bears and tigers don't attack people with any type of frequency because the average joe doesn't own these types of animals with any type of frequency.
I love the "reactive vs proactive" attitude, too: "we know it's dangerous and potentially tragic, but let's wait until some real bad shit happens before we do anything about it. And I'm not talking a few tragedies, I want tragedy to happen on a consistent basis before I start caring". Jesus Christ…
I'm all for personal liberty. I think all narcotics should be legal to use. You wanna shoot yourself up with heroin until you get gangrene and they have to cut off your arm? Be my guest. You wanna eat shitty foods until you're 800lbs and can't get out of your bed? Knock yourself out.
You want put others safety and the animal's well being at risk by owning an undomesticated killing machine that's going to be miserable? Go fuck yourself.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Yeah but come on, can you really compare the number of people who use alcohol and/or tobacco with the number of people who own dangerous exotic pets?
People ALWAYS bring up these statistics. I hate flying, and people always bring up that cliched "ya know, you're more likely to get in a car crash than a plane crash". Yeah no shit, I drive a lot more than I fly. That doesn't ease my mind because I still know that if the plane goes down, there's going to be maybe half a minute of pure terror and despair followed by a horrible death. Give me the statistics on how many people survive plane crashes as opposed to car crashes.
Last year, more people were killed in fist fights than flame throwers, bazookas and atomic bombs combined. Does that mean someone's fist is more dangerous?
I'm saying you are making a huge deal about something that simply isn't a big deal. If you are going to ask the gov't to make a law telling people how they should/should not live their life then it should be over something important and meaningful. This isn't. Get back to me when being mauled by a wild animal is a real concern for even 1% of Americans.The "what if" game? Are you actually telling me that some average joe meathead
owning one of the most effective, dangerous killing machines on the planet in a
residential neighbourhood shouldn't be anyone's concern? I shouldn't have
questions as to whether or not said meathead can properly contain a tiger? And I
shouldn't have concerns about the animal's well being?
Being proactive for the sake of being proactive leads to bad laws.I love the "reactive vs proactive" attitude, too: "we know it's dangerous and
potentially tragic, but let's wait until some real bad shit happens before we do
anything about it. And I'm not talking a few tragedies, I want tragedy to happen
on a consistent basis before I start caring". Jesus Christ…
Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson
Just to lighten the mood in here....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks