Re: Why 'Era vs Era' will always be an erroneous talking point...
three points on this:
1. We can't compare like for like in the heavyweights. Let's take the Louis/Bowe example. If Riddick Bowe had been born in the 1910's, he would not have been 6'5" and 18 stone.
If Joe Louis had been born in the late 1980's, he probably would have been 6'5" and 18 stone.
Improvements in diet and nutrition has made that much of a difference over 2 or 3 generations.
2. We certainly can't compare like for like in the other weight divisions. Sports science has really moved on here, and the weigh ins are not now just before the fight, which means that someone like Sergio Martinez is a gigantic "middleweight" who would have been at least a light heavy anytime before the 1980s.
Most boxers now weigh anything up to a stone and a half over the permitted wight limits by the time they get into the ring. So comparing Saul Alvarez to Willie Pep doesn't make any sense at all.
3. The fight game is different now. Fighters used to fight a couple of times per month to earn a living. They were therefore always in decent shape, but not as well training as a modern fighter who will train for three months for one specific fighter. That's why they used to have more losses, they fought more often and against all sorts of standards of fighter.
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Bookmarks