Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Im more impressed by what Foreman did in his 40s... what about u?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,316
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    565
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Hopkins
    Cold Heart and a Weak Mind

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    hop easy higher ranked opposition and schulz got shafted against foreman if i remember, granted i was all of ten years old

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    207 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1330
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    I dont know.

    Hopkins is still fighting and beating proper elite fighters but its nice to know its possible for an older man to still be an absolute tank that can take anything thrown at him and hurt people bad.

    We all want to be Foreman when we are old, someone no one will fuck with. Hopkins wouldnt want to fight a 46 year old Foreman

  5. #5
    jon09 Guest

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Hopkins by far is more impressive. The dude is almost 50 and schooling ranked fighters mentally and physically. And no one has knocked the old man out yet either. Hopkins = Badass.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    916
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Foreman's is more impressive.

    The World Heavyweight Champ is the King of Boxing, and none of these lighter-weight class Champions can f*<k with the Heavyweight Champ of the World.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    703
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    950
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    I was so glad to see BHop give Pavlik a boxing lesson.

    Wasn't Hopkins a 3:1 underdog going into that fight at least?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1293
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Hopkins by far. Foreman won the world championship but looked like shit in the process, lost every round then got a one-punch KO because he has freakish power.

    Hopkins is fighting at near 50 and he's outworking these young guys and seems to be quicker as well.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    715
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Foreman was the most impressive by far! Don't forget that he was away from boxing for years. He came back, had some tough fights and captured a belt.
    Impressed the hell out me!

    The thing is that Hopkins isn't done yet, the SOB might fight on into his late 50s.
    He is impressive too.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    916
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    World Heavyweight Champ in the 1970s, a Golden era of Heavyweights, then 10 years retirement from 1977 to 1987, and reclaiming the World Heavyweight Championship 21 years later during another Golden era of Heavyweights in the 90s is more impressive.

    No midget can compete with the Heavyweight Champ.
    Big George Foreman would literally crush any of these lighter-weight class World Champs. The Heavyweight being the best fighter is why weight-classes were invented.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    45,695
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5038
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Nothing but tremendous respect for both. Honestly I enjoyed Foreman's geezer run more, but the unbroken longevity and consistency of Hopkins is more impressive to me. He never left. Foreman is the jolly old man you want as a next door neighbor, though he could be surly underneath. Hopkins is the uptight loud guy who parks his car along yours to block you in just so you'll have to go knock on his door and explain why you took his spot. Foreman was a great shot in the arm for the game then.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Big George's by FAR

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,556
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    707
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Hop. George had a tremendous punch n could take some punishment, but what Hop is doing is pure greatness. Literally winning off if boxing IQ and nothing else. The guy is slower, doesn't hit as hard, slower reflexes/reaction time, and while in shape for 50, has reduced stamina yet schools guys half his age and ruins them mentally. He's an amazing fighter.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    571
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    Foremans comeback was remarkable.

    But it's definitely Hopkins finite and not even close.

    Foreman's 2nd career has also been described as a bit average as well. He was outclassed by Holyfield and Morrison, was getting wasted by Moorer too until Michael's stupidity got him tagged good, got bested by Axel who was robbed.

    In fact the only other win bar the Moorer fluke and Schultz robbery that was against a top opponent was Shannon Briggs in which Foreman himself was robbed. Briggs was not exactly a consistent technician though. I also think his performances against Grimsley and Savarese were soso and questionable respectively.

    Foreman's experience and newfound ring IQ coupled with his strength, power and chin were the mainstays of success which happen to all carry well into advanced age when the weight had increased to 260lbs!
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    5,677
    Mentioned
    120 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    751
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Foreman & Hopkins in their 40s- whose run was more impressive?

    While Foreman was surely no fluke through the entire run, he surely was a little lucky vs. Moorer- thanks to Moorer's idiocy. lololol....

    Hop at least keeps his titles. Keeps them in a faster and more fluid division. Foreman was dealing with slow pokes who only knew how to punch hard up to the 5th round- after that, they were tired as hell and lost steam.

    I'd say B-Hop. But Foreman was phenomenal. It took great courage to do what he did.
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. More Impressive ?
    By Truth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-21-2009, 10:21 AM
  2. Most impressive title run
    By Motor City Cobra in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 06-20-2009, 07:05 AM
  3. Which would be more impressive?
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-08-2009, 11:56 AM
  4. 70's Foreman VS 90's Foreman
    By JT Rock in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 08-22-2007, 04:00 PM
  5. Demetrius Hopkins scores yet another impressive KO
    By Wacko3205 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-11-2006, 09:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing