Thread: Has there ever been a more dominant performance ?

Uuuh Foreman vs Frazier? ??

BHop over Tito was much more dominant than Floyd vs Manny. Floyd deserved the win, but he never really hurt or beat Manny up, he just shut Manny's offense down with his defense. I love the skill portion of the sport, but I wasn't overly excited or impressed by the way Floyd fought that one. Credit him for the clear win over his top threat though...

Dominant and greatest are two terms that become blurred real fast. But the first one I thought of was Whitaker vs A. Nelson. Both top in respected divisions, both p4p top ten. Hated everything about that fight as it unfolded and Whitakers clowny bs, but he was a shadow to hit in there. Monzon v Napoles deserves mention. Tszyu v Judah...chicken dance anyone

Let me run one by you. McGirt vs Brown. Brown was the big strong, power punching terror of the division. McGirt was smaller, shorter, and injured. Rotator cuff shoulder injury.
He gave Brown a boxing lesson that involved judicious footwork, initiating and winning exchanges. And scoring a knockdown.

Pac vs Morales III
Pac vs Barrera I
Pac vs Margarito
Pac vs De la Hoya
Pac vs Mayweather ( it was not fighting but running... a dominant running performance)

Originally Posted by brucelee

Pac vs Margarito

ATG vs. ATG.
Not ATG vs. All Time Cheater.

Bhop & winky over Tito.
Foreman over Frazier
Rjj over JT
Pac is not an atg, he is exciting, but too many losses in convincing fashion.

This fight was a total hype job.

Originally Posted by SlimTrae

Pac is not an atg, he is exciting, but too many losses in convincing fashion.

That's a very controversial statement!

Originally Posted by Beanflicker

Originally Posted by SlimTrae

Pac is not an atg, he is exciting, but too many losses in convincing fashion.

That's a very controversial statement!

Yes it is.

Originally Posted by SlimTrae

Originally Posted by Beanflicker

Originally Posted by SlimTrae

Pac is not an atg, he is exciting, but too many losses in convincing fashion.

That's a very controversial statement!

Yes it is.

I wonder if anyone will take issue with it!

Originally Posted by g3org3

I talking about floyd and manny and them being the best two of there generation. It was a totally one sided event and I was wondering if there has ever been a more dominant performance ? It has to be two fighters that are the absolute best of there generation, I'm not talking about just two guys that are the best for a short period of time, like say Garcia and matthysse.

Floyd vs pac was completely dominant imo

Pac had about 4 rounds imo.

Floyd vs Marquez was total domination.