Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29

Thread: GGG vs Canelo done deal

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Windsor
    Posts
    955
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1097
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    Quote Originally Posted by SlimTrae View Post
    I'll PPV for this one.
    Absolument!

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1267
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    I'll only buy it if there is a solid undercard, as I don't give Canelo a good chance to win.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,480
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1015
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    Part of me doesn't want to put money in the hands of canelo and golden boy after then stalling and catch weight business. At the same time, GGG deserves a payday for playing the game straight up. I guess i cant put all the blame on canelo and Golden boy when half of it was Cotto too. Price will be the decider for me most likely.
    They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.

    Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,623
    Mentioned
    1667 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    I will believe it when I see it.

    Canelo deserves a beating for avoiding this fight for so long.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1044
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    See this is what i do not get Canelo was fighting in 154 and just won the belt off Cotto in november even if Canelo fights him in October it is still under a year which is about right amount of time. Canelo does not need to get time added for Cotto and Martinez because they did not fight GGG.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,623
    Mentioned
    1667 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    See this is what i do not get Canelo was fighting in 154 and just won the belt off Cotto in november even if Canelo fights him in October it is still under a year which is about right amount of time. Canelo does not need to get time added for Cotto and Martinez because they did not fight GGG.
    True but allowing Canelo to have the WBC title means it all counts.

    Canelo has always ballooned in weight and had an unfair advantage over all the real light middleweights.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1044
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    Look if you make the weight i really do not care i mean if he can cut down and not die i mean that just what rules are today. I do not charge Canelo with dodging when he got the championship in late November he does not get time for Cotto and Martinez dodging GGG does not make since.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1044
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    I do not understand the hate for Canelo the kid is 25 years old and has a resume better then most in this sport i mean even guy he is facing resume is shit. GGG is great and is favored but the more Canelo is hated the more i kinda want him to win. It should be good fight but this is GGG first real opponent.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,623
    Mentioned
    1667 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    I do not understand the hate for Canelo the kid is 25 years old and has a resume better then most in this sport i mean even guy he is facing resume is shit. GGG is great and is favored but the more Canelo is hated the more i kinda want him to win. It should be good fight but this is GGG first real opponent.
    Really? Some think it is a big mis-match.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1267
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    See this is what i do not get Canelo was fighting in 154 and just won the belt off Cotto in november even if Canelo fights him in October it is still under a year which is about right amount of time. Canelo does not need to get time added for Cotto and Martinez because they did not fight GGG.
    True but allowing Canelo to have the WBC title means it all counts.

    Canelo has always ballooned in weight and had an unfair advantage over all the real light middleweights.

    What all counts? Obviously Khan was a sham of a title defence, but if Canelo is going to fight GGG as it seems, what can you blame him for? You alluded in another thread that you aren't even aware of the Charlo brothers, watch them and tell me they look like smaller guys than Canelo? In fact what top junior middleweights do? Canelo puts on a lot of weight after his fights, but he's not actually a big man.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,623
    Mentioned
    1667 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    See this is what i do not get Canelo was fighting in 154 and just won the belt off Cotto in november even if Canelo fights him in October it is still under a year which is about right amount of time. Canelo does not need to get time added for Cotto and Martinez because they did not fight GGG.
    True but allowing Canelo to have the WBC title means it all counts.

    Canelo has always ballooned in weight and had an unfair advantage over all the real light middleweights.

    What all counts? Obviously Khan was a sham of a title defence, but if Canelo is going to fight GGG as it seems, what can you blame him for? You alluded in another thread that you aren't even aware of the Charlo brothers, watch them and tell me they look like smaller guys than Canelo? In fact what top junior middleweights do? Canelo puts on a lot of weight after his fights, but he's not actually a big man.
    Holding the belt means he has to carry the obligations that the previous champ had. If you are not a middleweight, stop fighting for the title then.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1267
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    See this is what i do not get Canelo was fighting in 154 and just won the belt off Cotto in november even if Canelo fights him in October it is still under a year which is about right amount of time. Canelo does not need to get time added for Cotto and Martinez because they did not fight GGG.
    True but allowing Canelo to have the WBC title means it all counts.

    Canelo has always ballooned in weight and had an unfair advantage over all the real light middleweights.

    What all counts? Obviously Khan was a sham of a title defence, but if Canelo is going to fight GGG as it seems, what can you blame him for? You alluded in another thread that you aren't even aware of the Charlo brothers, watch them and tell me they look like smaller guys than Canelo? In fact what top junior middleweights do? Canelo puts on a lot of weight after his fights, but he's not actually a big man.
    Holding the belt means he has to carry the obligations that the previous champ had. If you are not a middleweight, stop fighting for the title then.
    Again, if Canelo fights GGG next, what is your point? Cotto started the 155 pound division, and apparently didn't have the same obligation when he was champion? I don't give Canelo much hope against GGG and would actually rather see him vacate and fight either Charlo or Andrade at 154 for the sake of seeing good fights.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,623
    Mentioned
    1667 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GGG vs Canelo done deal

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    See this is what i do not get Canelo was fighting in 154 and just won the belt off Cotto in november even if Canelo fights him in October it is still under a year which is about right amount of time. Canelo does not need to get time added for Cotto and Martinez because they did not fight GGG.
    True but allowing Canelo to have the WBC title means it all counts.

    Canelo has always ballooned in weight and had an unfair advantage over all the real light middleweights.

    What all counts? Obviously Khan was a sham of a title defence, but if Canelo is going to fight GGG as it seems, what can you blame him for? You alluded in another thread that you aren't even aware of the Charlo brothers, watch them and tell me they look like smaller guys than Canelo? In fact what top junior middleweights do? Canelo puts on a lot of weight after his fights, but he's not actually a big man.
    Holding the belt means he has to carry the obligations that the previous champ had. If you are not a middleweight, stop fighting for the title then.
    Again, if Canelo fights GGG next, what is your point? Cotto started the 155 pound division, and apparently didn't have the same obligation when he was champion? I don't give Canelo much hope against GGG and would actually rather see him vacate and fight either Charlo or Andrade at 154 for the sake of seeing good fights.
    Cotto did have the same obligations and stuttered she hearing triple G name was mentioned.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    This is going to be a good rivalry, probably even a trilogy. Canelos age will be the advantage here, the longer this fight simmers without it happening is an advantage to Canelo who only gets better and for Golovkin at 34-35 this is not good. I can see Golovkin winning the first fight and Canelo winning the rematch and rubber match, but Id rather see Golovkin win the first match via stoppage. I would have more respect for Canelo if he fought Demetriud Andrade or the Charlo bros but instead his knockout reel consist of a chinny welterweight and a rusty Kirkland, could not even stop an over the hill Mosely or Cotto.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 81
    Last Post: 06-10-2015, 02:41 AM
  2. Replies: 56
    Last Post: 12-15-2013, 09:34 PM
  3. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-08-2013, 06:22 PM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-31-2013, 10:57 PM
  5. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 12-30-2011, 04:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing