US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Republicans flipped 12 seats in the House so far: women candidates and minority candidates! Nancy Schifosi was bragging 3 weeks ago Dems would flip minimum 15 seats away from Republicans. Hahaha Dems lost so many fucking seats its beyond laughable. Now its the smallest majority since World War 2.
oh, Trump won 10 million MORE votes than he did in 2016.....
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Republicans flipped 12 seats in the House so far: women candidates and minority candidates! Nancy Schifosi was bragging 3 weeks ago Dems would flip minimum 15 seats away from Republicans. Hahaha Dems lost so many fucking seats its beyond laughable. Now its the smallest majority since World War 2.
oh, Trump won 10 million MORE votes than he did in 2016.....
See, I don't defend Democrats or dis Republicans. I couldn't care less.
And yeah... 10 million more votes than in 2016, and STILL 6 million less than Joe Biden.
Go figure...
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Republicans flipped 12 seats in the House so far: women candidates and minority candidates! Nancy Schifosi was bragging 3 weeks ago Dems would flip minimum 15 seats away from Republicans. Hahaha Dems lost so many fucking seats its beyond laughable. Now its the smallest majority since World War 2.
oh, Trump won 10 million MORE votes than he did in 2016.....
See, I don't defend Democrats or dis Republicans. I couldn't care less.
And yeah... 10 million more votes than in 2016, and STILL
6 million less than Joe Biden.
Go figure...
I'm talkin' legal votes, though. ;)
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Republicans flipped 12 seats in the House so far: women candidates and minority candidates! Nancy Schifosi was bragging 3 weeks ago Dems would flip minimum 15 seats away from Republicans. Hahaha Dems lost so many fucking seats its beyond laughable. Now its the smallest majority since World War 2.
oh, Trump won 10 million MORE votes than he did in 2016.....
See, I don't defend Democrats or dis Republicans. I couldn't care less.
And yeah... 10 million more votes than in 2016, and STILL
6 million less than Joe Biden.
Go figure...
I'm talkin' legal votes, though. ;)
I thought you were waiting for the courts to decide that.
You're tripping over yourself.
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Republicans flipped 12 seats in the House so far: women candidates and minority candidates! Nancy Schifosi was bragging 3 weeks ago Dems would flip minimum 15 seats away from Republicans. Hahaha Dems lost so many fucking seats its beyond laughable. Now its the smallest majority since World War 2.
oh, Trump won 10 million MORE votes than he did in 2016.....
See, I don't defend Democrats or dis Republicans. I couldn't care less.
And yeah... 10 million more votes than in 2016, and STILL
6 million less than Joe Biden.
Go figure...
I'm talkin' legal votes, though. ;)
I thought you were waiting for the
courts to decide that.
You're tripping over yourself.
The courts will be throwing out Biden votes. Have you been following?
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Or are you believing the mainstream media vote counts based on the fraudulent declarations of the state election commissions?
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Hey Brock. I'm so glad you took off your double-sided mask and we're seeing the true you again. ;D
That Trump-hating charade was frankly a bit pathetic.
Show your true colors man! ;D
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Also I do have to say that back during world war II when the House of Representatives had a very very slim majority for the Democrats, think about the historicity of it.
I bet pelosi will not seek another run seeing as they lost at least 11 seats this time
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN), chairman of the National Republican Congressinoal Committee, noted all House seats flipped by Republicans defeating Democrat incumbents were won by minority, women, and military veteran candidates,
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey Brock. I'm so glad you took off your double-sided mask and we're seeing the true you again. ;D
That Trump-hating charade was frankly a bit pathetic.
Show your true colors man! ;D
Hey Tito, how is defending Trump AND the integrity of the system against what I believe was election fraud and waiting for the litigation to go through the system, taking off a mask and seeing the real me?
Also saying it is a charade, and pathetic, you do realize that is a bit .....? :dontknow:
It's all good, B.
I'll give you one more go but I don't think it will make any difference. I still hate Donald Trump for his cavalier attitude towards the coronavirus and for his reckless cavalier attitude towards Mask wearing since the beginning of this pandemic.
Tito, it isnt good to see things in only black and white. Somehow to you, my defending Trump against what I see as election fraud means my hatred of things that Trump did was a charade. Those 2 positions are not mutually exclusive.
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey Brock. I'm so glad you took off your double-sided mask and we're seeing the true you again. ;D
That Trump-hating charade was frankly a bit pathetic.
Show your true colors man! ;D
Hey Tito, how is defending Trump AND the integrity of the system against what I believe was election fraud and waiting for the litigation to go through the system, taking off a mask and seeing the real me?
Also saying it is a charade, and pathetic, you do realize that is a bit .....? :dontknow:
It's all good, B.
I'll give you one more go but I don't think it will make any difference. I still hate Donald Trump for his cavalier attitude towards the coronavirus and for his reckless cavalier attitude towards Mask wearing since the beginning of this pandemic.
Tito, it isnt good to see things in only black and white. Somehow to you, my defending Trump against what I see as election fraud means my hatred of things that Trump did was a charade. Those 2 positions are not mutually exclusive.
You're choosing to see the alt-right's version of the election results and events and that's fine. However, realize that you're in a very distinct minority... which shrinks by the minute.
The little island Trump is standing on is taking on water and people are quietly bailing out little by little.
On the one hand you "pound the pulpit" talking about letting the courts decide..... and on the other you ignore the fact that courts are already throwing out cases one by one.
You can talk about voting for Jo... but you defend Trump with a gusto not seen since the days you wanted Trump to "mow down the toothless peasants at the border."
Not trying to get into it with you..... but I'm a straight ahead guy with unwavering opinions.
When I do change my opinion, it's because someone has given me information that I've analyzed and decided it's good enough for me to change my mind.
I'm not a flip-flopper.
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey Brock. I'm so glad you took off your double-sided mask and we're seeing the true you again. ;D
That Trump-hating charade was frankly a bit pathetic.
Show your true colors man! ;D
Hey Tito, how is defending Trump AND the integrity of the system against what I believe was election fraud and waiting for the litigation to go through the system, taking off a mask and seeing the real me?
Also saying it is a charade, and pathetic, you do realize that is a bit .....? :dontknow:
It's all good, B.
I'll give you one more go but I don't think it will make any difference. I still hate Donald Trump for his cavalier attitude towards the coronavirus and for his reckless cavalier attitude towards Mask wearing since the beginning of this pandemic.
Tito, it isnt good to see things in only black and white. Somehow to you, my defending Trump against what I see as election fraud means my hatred of things that Trump did was a charade. Those 2 positions are not mutually exclusive.
Not sure why you care if I am on a tiny island taking on water.....? Youre the one on a tiny island, B! alt-right?, you're choosing to label my view and that's fine. I just see what appears to be fraud. You don't. I think we're both good with that. A shrinking minority? It doesnt always go by how many people think something, often the "shrinking minority" position has turned out to be right throughout history. Mob rule by a cackling "majority" shouldnt change anyone's opinion. this is not going to be settled in the court of public opinion. I keep telling you that, but you keep saying the same thing here.
On the one hand you "pound the pulpit" talking about letting the courts decide.....and you're pounding your pulpit. Whats the difference? Just be happy with what you think.
and on the other you ignore the fact that courts are already throwing out cases one by one. ***the courts that have thrown out cases are lower courts, like in the past how many times the 9th circuit of SF threw out so many of Trump's cases. But Trump won many of them afterwards in the Supreme Court. There are several cases moving forward. YOu do know that, right? I think you're really being influenced by the mainstream media, and that is pathetic.
You can talk about voting for Jo... but you defend Trump with a gusto ***You dont seem to understand I am not just defending Trump, I would defend anyone against what I felt was a violation of their rights or against fraud. I am also defending the idea of free and fair elections. My gusto shouldn't be of any interest to you. But I guess I'm flattered??
not seen since the days you wanted Trump to "mow down the toothless peasants at the border." ***wow, great memory, almost as great as Beanz when he digs something up from 3 years ago. YOu're one to talk about violent language lmfao kill someone and piss on their corpse. Hypocritical for sure
Not trying to get into it with you..... but I'm a straight ahead guy with unwavering opinions. ***I never attack your opinions though. Straight ahead guy but with maybe a tiny blind spot that the way in which you keep hammering at my "gusto" and attacking what in YOUR mind is "flip-flopping", is a bit strange. And thats MY unwavering opinion ;)
When I do change my opinion, it's because someone has given me information that I've analyzed and decided it's good enough for me to change my mind.
I'm not a flip-flopper. *** You're also not the judge of others' right to have gusto on any given thing, or of whats "good enough for them" to have their opinions that they have.
But your tone sure comes across like that. ..... and, What did I change my opinion on? I didnt vote for Trump. It is not mutually exclusive to vote for Jorgensen and defend the election process and Trump against what I feel is criminal, widespread fraud. and....you are certainly trying to "get into it with me", so stop lying Tito. It's pathetic.
Just curious, do you work for CNN? ;D
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey Brock. I'm so glad you took off your double-sided mask and we're seeing the true you again. ;D
That Trump-hating charade was frankly a bit pathetic.
Show your true colors man! ;D
Hey Tito, how is defending Trump AND the integrity of the system against what I believe was election fraud and waiting for the litigation to go through the system, taking off a mask and seeing the real me?
Also saying it is a charade, and pathetic, you do realize that is a bit .....? :dontknow:
It's all good, B.
I'll give you one more go but I don't think it will make any difference. I still hate Donald Trump for his cavalier attitude towards the coronavirus and for his reckless cavalier attitude towards Mask wearing since the beginning of this pandemic.
Tito, it isnt good to see things in only black and white. Somehow to you, my defending Trump against what I see as election fraud means my hatred of things that Trump did was a charade. Those 2 positions are not mutually exclusive.
Not sure why you care if I am on a tiny island taking on water.....? Youre the one on a tiny island, B! alt-right?, you're choosing to label my view and that's fine. I just see what appears to be fraud. You don't. I think we're both good with that. A shrinking minority? It doesnt always go by how many people think something, often the "shrinking minority" position has turned out to be right throughout history. Mob rule by a cackling "majority" shouldnt change anyone's opinion. this is not going to be settled in the court of public opinion. I keep telling you that, but you keep saying the same thing here.
On the one hand you "pound the pulpit" talking about letting the courts decide.....
and you're pounding your position. Whats the difference?
and on the other you ignore the fact that courts are already throwing out cases one by one.
***the courts that have thrown out cases are local courts, like in the past how many times the 9th circuit of SF threw out so many of Trump's cases. But Trump won many of them afterwards in the Supreme Court. There are several cases moving forward. YOu do know that, right? I think you're really being influenced by the mainstream media, and that is pathetic.
You can talk about voting for Jo... but you defend Trump with a gusto
***You dont seem to understand I am not just defending Trump, I would defend anyone against what I felt was a violation of their rights or against fraud. I am also defending the idea of free and fair elections. My gusto shouldn't be of any interest to you. But I guess I'm flattered??
not seen since the days you wanted Trump to "mow down the toothless peasants at the border."
***wow, great memory, almost as great as Beanz when he digs something up from 3 years ago. YOu're one to talk about violent language lmfao kill someone and piss on their corpse. Hypocritical for sure
Not trying to get into it with you..... but I'm a straight ahead guy with unwavering opinions.
***I never attack your opinions though. Straight ahead guy but with maybe a tiny blind spot that the way in which you keep hammering at my "gusto" and attacking what in YOUR mind is "flip-flopping", is a bit strange. And thats MY unwavering opinion ;)
When I do change my opinion, it's because someone has given me information that I've analyzed and decided it's good enough for me to change my mind.
I'm not a flip-flopper.
*** You're also not the judge of others' right to have gusto on any given thing, or of whats "good enough for them" to have their opinions that they have.
But your tone sure comes across like that. ..... and, What did I change my opinion on? I didnt vote for Trump. It is not mutually exclusive to vote for Jorgensen and defend the election process and Trump against what I feel is criminal, widespread fraud. and....you are certainly trying to "get into it with me", so stop lying Tito. It's pathetic.
This lame "mainstream media" line got old years ago. Keep on using it if you like, but it's worthless.
I purposely seek out objective media and gather a consensus among them. You, on the other hand, get your "facts" directly from the slanted media on the other side.
Or did you think biased media exists ONLY on the left side of the ledger? :rolleyes:
None of what you're saying changes the fact that you're a flip-flopper. To the EXTREME. ;) ;)
That, of course, is your prerogative.... as is mine to call you out on it.
You don't "hate" Trump, Brock. You love him and always have. Own up to it and admit it.
Look dude... in the end, Trump will have to vacate the White House and frankly I hope the legal system makes his life miserable from here on out.
Between all the shit he's going to have to answer for... and his wife taking him to the cleaners... he won't have time to think about a ridiculous run in 2024.
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Now, this thread is about the US HOuse of Representatives, so I shall bring it back on track ;)
I feel the MOST significant races/results there were the following:
Republican Nancy Mace will beat freshman Democratic Rep. Joe Cunningham in South Carolina’s 1st District.
GOP candidate Stephanie Bice will defeat first-term Democratic Rep. Kendra Horn in Oklahoma’s 5th District.
Republican Michelle Fischbach will prevail over longtime Democratic Rep. Collin Peterson in Minnesota’s 7th District.
GOP candidate Yvette Herrell will win her rematch against first-term Democratic Rep. Xochitl Torres Small in New Mexico’s 2nd District.
Republican Ashley Hinson will defeat first-term Democratic Rep. Abby Finkenauer in Iowa’s 1st District.
GOP candidate Maria Elvira Salazar will beat freshman Rep. Donna Shalala in Florida’s 27th District.
Republican Peter Meijer will win the race to replace Amash over Democrat Hillary Scholten.
Fischbach ran an excellent campaign and was up against a real vicious group of far-left activists, yet still prevailed. I met Fischbach back in January 2020 in Denver, Colorado at a Starbucks, and she is an amazing woman.
Almost forgot: a round of reciprocal recriminations between the House Democratic caucus’ moderate and left-wing factions. Moderates blamed the “defund the police” sloganeering and “socialist” branding from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her supporters, which Republicans deployed in swing district attack ads. Ocasio-Cortez shot back by claiming moderate incumbents ran musty campaigns with minimal investment in digital media.
Huh???
Re: US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NoSavingByTheBell
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey Brock. I'm so glad you took off your double-sided mask and we're seeing the true you again. ;D
That Trump-hating charade was frankly a bit pathetic.
Show your true colors man! ;D
Hey Tito, how is defending Trump AND the integrity of the system against what I believe was election fraud and waiting for the litigation to go through the system, taking off a mask and seeing the real me?
Also saying it is a charade, and pathetic, you do realize that is a bit .....? :dontknow:
It's all good, B.
I'll give you one more go but I don't think it will make any difference. I still hate Donald Trump for his cavalier attitude towards the coronavirus and for his reckless cavalier attitude towards Mask wearing since the beginning of this pandemic.
Tito, it isnt good to see things in only black and white. Somehow to you, my defending Trump against what I see as election fraud means my hatred of things that Trump did was a charade. Those 2 positions are not mutually exclusive.
Not sure why you care if I am on a tiny island taking on water.....? Youre the one on a tiny island, B! alt-right?, you're choosing to label my view and that's fine. I just see what appears to be fraud. You don't. I think we're both good with that. A shrinking minority? It doesnt always go by how many people think something, often the "shrinking minority" position has turned out to be right throughout history. Mob rule by a cackling "majority" shouldnt change anyone's opinion. this is not going to be settled in the court of public opinion. I keep telling you that, but you keep saying the same thing here.
On the one hand you "pound the pulpit" talking about letting the courts decide.....
and you're pounding your position. Whats the difference?
and on the other you ignore the fact that courts are already throwing out cases one by one.
***the courts that have thrown out cases are local courts, like in the past how many times the 9th circuit of SF threw out so many of Trump's cases. But Trump won many of them afterwards in the Supreme Court. There are several cases moving forward. YOu do know that, right? I think you're really being influenced by the mainstream media, and that is pathetic.
You can talk about voting for Jo... but you defend Trump with a gusto
***You dont seem to understand I am not just defending Trump, I would defend anyone against what I felt was a violation of their rights or against fraud. I am also defending the idea of free and fair elections. My gusto shouldn't be of any interest to you. But I guess I'm flattered??
not seen since the days you wanted Trump to "mow down the toothless peasants at the border."
***wow, great memory, almost as great as Beanz when he digs something up from 3 years ago. YOu're one to talk about violent language lmfao kill someone and piss on their corpse. Hypocritical for sure
Not trying to get into it with you..... but I'm a straight ahead guy with unwavering opinions.
***I never attack your opinions though. Straight ahead guy but with maybe a tiny blind spot that the way in which you keep hammering at my "gusto" and attacking what in YOUR mind is "flip-flopping", is a bit strange. And thats MY unwavering opinion ;)
When I do change my opinion, it's because someone has given me information that I've analyzed and decided it's good enough for me to change my mind.
I'm not a flip-flopper.
*** You're also not the judge of others' right to have gusto on any given thing, or of whats "good enough for them" to have their opinions that they have.
But your tone sure comes across like that. ..... and, What did I change my opinion on? I didnt vote for Trump. It is not mutually exclusive to vote for Jorgensen and defend the election process and Trump against what I feel is criminal, widespread fraud. and....you are certainly trying to "get into it with me", so stop lying Tito. It's pathetic.
This lame "mainstream media" line got old years ago. Keep on using it if you like, but it's worthless.
I purposely seek out objective media and gather a consensus among them. You, on the other hand, get your "facts" directly from the slanted media on the other side.
Or did you think biased media exists ONLY on the left side of the ledger? :rolleyes:
None of what you're saying changes the fact that you're a flip-flopper. To the EXTREME. ;) ;)
That, of course, is your prerogative.... as is mine to call you out on it.
You don't "hate" Trump, Brock. You love him and always have. Own up to it and admit it.
Look dude... in the end, Trump will have to vacate the White House and frankly I hope the legal system makes his life miserable from here on out.
Between all the shit he's going to have to answer for... and his wife taking him to the cleaners... he won't have time to think about a ridiculous run in 2024.
2024? How could he run in 2024? A person only gets TWO terms for President here, Tito. ;)
