Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
I got proof that everyone is swerving Jacobs, not one of them can rebut this shit, 1509 Jacob duckers. Fact.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0t_uTNUnBAo
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
There are 4 legit guys at 160. Jacobs, GGG, Canelo, and charlo. BJS has a belt but isn't that great. Lemieux is decent. Hopefully these guys fight each other more. There are enough good fights to be made. No excuses.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Golovkin is a money hungry path of least resistance guy and has been for years. Jacobs, a guy who's chosen vocation in life is to fight, would be better served by not fighting ;D
Just brilliant.
Whats wrong with him fighting Lemieux, Charlo, N'Dam/Murata? Yeah yeah I know, I beat him, we're ducking him and who gives a fuck about them. His alternative?
Last time I checked, posting on social media didn't improve rankings and doesn't pay very well, for most.
You list Lemieux completely ignoring Lemieux already turned him down, wouldn't even negotiate, same as GGG and BJS. But go ahead, blame the guy that wants to fight. It's popular these days to blame the guy that wants to fight.
Charlo is GGGs mandatory, GGG doesn't want to fight him either. Charlo's fault right?
Oh dear. You've allowed the GGG red mist to fall again and you've missed the point entirely. I'll indulge you. Post your evidence that Jacobs approached Lemeiux and or BJS Saunders and they knocked him back.
Point being, and the point I was responding to. Jacobs needs to fight, NOT fighting, is NOT going to work out for Jacobs because.....
No one in the grand scheme of things cares about Danny Jacobs. He's the cancer guy who got steamrollered by Pirog, won a title against a guy BJS hammered in minutes and the guy who gave GGG a better fight than most expected, which some managed to convert into a win. He's very good, but he's no star, which means he ain't dictating shit.
No, you are quite right, it's all GGG's fault that we dont have a Charlo fight already rubber stamped for December. I propose Charlo takes to social media to shout about it whilst fighting no one in the meantime!
Jacobs V Charlo then? I assume since both men so desperately want to fight and fight the best, this is a no brainer. Actually Im surprised and a little disappointed that you're not giving both men shit for not making this obvious match up, given that everyone else in the World is shit scared of the pair of them.
Great fight, and you still get to slag off GGG before during and after, win win.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
@Memphis You really do like guzzling on GGG’s man juice, don’t you? Take a break and catch a breath.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Yes, you got me, Im the one that's obligated here ;D
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
@
Memphis You really do like guzzling on GGG’s man juice, don’t you? Take a break and catch a breath.
Says the Canelo lover. :)
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
@
Memphis You really do like guzzling on GGG’s man juice, don’t you? Take a break and catch a breath.
Says the Canelo lover. :)
I admit Canelo was completely out boxed by Mayweather and I think a prime Martinez would've put it on him too but you all seem to think GGG is some sort of killer based on him knocking over real low level guys. Least Alvarez had the balls to step up to 160 and fight! GGG shit himself every time Ward's name is was mentioned.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
@
Memphis You really do like guzzling on GGG’s man juice, don’t you? Take a break and catch a breath.
Says the Canelo lover. :)
I admit Canelo was completely out boxed by Mayweather and I think a prime Martinez would've put it on him too but you all seem to think GGG is some sort of killer based on him knocking over real low level guys. Least Alvarez had the balls to step up to 160 and fight! GGG shit himself every time Ward's name is was mentioned.
Canelo has been a middleweight for years and has done everything to avoid the fight. He was cornered to fight GGG and had no other choice.
How did you score the fight?
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
@
Memphis You really do like guzzling on GGG’s man juice, don’t you? Take a break and catch a breath.
Says the Canelo lover. :)
I admit Canelo was completely out boxed by Mayweather and I think a prime Martinez would've put it on him too but you all seem to think GGG is some sort of killer based on him knocking over real low level guys. Least Alvarez had the balls to step up to 160 and fight! GGG shit himself every time Ward's name is was mentioned.
Canelo has been a middleweight for years and has done everything to avoid the fight. He was cornered to fight GGG and had no other choice.
How did you score the fight?
I scored it 6-6 so I agree with the official decision. It was a fair draw in my opinion.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GaMo
@
Memphis You really do like guzzling on GGG’s man juice, don’t you? Take a break and catch a breath.
Says the Canelo lover. :)
I admit Canelo was completely out boxed by Mayweather and I think a prime Martinez would've put it on him too but you all seem to think GGG is some sort of killer based on him knocking over real low level guys. Least Alvarez had the balls to step up to 160 and fight! GGG shit himself every time Ward's name is was mentioned.
Canelo has been a middleweight for years and has done everything to avoid the fight. He was cornered to fight GGG and had no other choice.
How did you score the fight?
I scored it 6-6 so I agree with the official decision. It was a fair draw in my opinion.
That is fair enough.
Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London