Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Also no-one takes into account Naz was weight drained and had a broken hand. Fact.
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Back to Floyd-Naz...
They share one common opponent - Augie Sanchez. Floyd suffered a one-sided hiding against Augie. Naz sent poor Augie out the ring on a stretcher. Just facts. Fact.
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Floyd would want to upstage Barrera and slam Prince into the turnbuckle at every corner.
naz would have KOed barera prime for prime
Really?? I thought Naz was pretty close to his prime when he got humiliated by MAB.
see above :)
Yeah..... I see your point.
27 is pretty much an over-the-hill age for a fighter.
:rolleyes:
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Floyd would want to upstage Barrera and slam Prince into the turnbuckle at every corner.
Gotta be careful with the prince though... like Tito Trinidad, both hands are lethal. ;)
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
personality sways fans opinion in boxing more than any other sport
why people love floyd so much and yet dislike naz ill never know
Naz would win by KO him in my opinion
Yeah, cos Floyd's always looked chinny and loads of people have KO'd him in the past haven't they ? :rolleyes:
I couldn't give two fucks for either of them as people, just about pure boxing ability.
floyds never been knocked out - what a fantastic analagy of the fight
how about this - In his prime Naz knocked everyone out
1 nil to me
uh, own goal I think. Floyd has been ko'd in 0% of his fights . Naz didn't knock everyone out (if I've told you once I've told you a million times, don't exaggerate. :) ) .Infact he had an 86% stoppage record , which is very impressive, but his record against "Elite" fighters is fought 1 lost 1 . Mentally, he lost his aura and He couldn't handle that so he had to retire.
Like I've said before, don't think that the Floyd back then was like the Floyd of today. Naz was a very strong , good albeit unorthodox fighter that made an absolute killing back in the day , which he deserves respect for. But do you honestly believe that Corkscrew right from his toes would've got anywhere near the chin of a guy as skilled as Floyd , bearing in mind Barrera dealt with it very comfortably?
so with the own goal, that's 2-0 to me.
bringing naz's loss to mab into a discussion is like bringing tysons loss to mcbride into a discussion
2 nil me
How do you work that out Einstein? they're totally different. Naz's loss to MAB was his first and only loss coming off a 35 fight winning streak and he was 27 years old.
Tyson was 39, had been beaten by Danny Williams in his Previous fight , had done time , drugs and all sorts of shit.
I suppose it makes sense in your World.
Don't let the facts deter you though , you just keep dredging out the same old horseshit. :rolleyes:
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Floyd would want to upstage Barrera and slam Prince into the turnbuckle at every corner.
Gotta be careful with the prince though... like Tito Trinidad, both hands are lethal. ;)
Something up, sport?
I don't remember any scraps in the recent past.
Enlighten me?
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Prime Naz dismantled fighters with ease (similar to Tyson he lost his trainer, lacked discipline, relied too much on his power and fell in love with himself) and that version at a catch weight with Floyd say 133lb would have been a great fight which he could have won.
Floyd has problems with southpaws, punchers and unorthodox fighters all which make Naz a problem for Mayweather.
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Floyd would want to upstage Barrera and slam Prince into the turnbuckle at every corner.
Gotta be careful with the prince though... like Tito Trinidad, both hands are lethal. ;)
Something up, sport?
I don't remember any scraps in the recent past.
Enlighten me?
I dunno what you mean bro? :confused:
Just two mate chatting about two-handed power punchers.
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Floyd would want to upstage Barrera and slam Prince into the turnbuckle at every corner.
Gotta be careful with the prince though... like Tito Trinidad, both hands are lethal. ;)
Something up, sport?
I don't remember any scraps in the recent past.
Enlighten me?
I dunno what you mean bro? :confused:
Just two mate chatting about two-handed power punchers.
Do not worry about it Tito. Beanflicker is a strange one. :)
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Floyd would want to upstage Barrera and slam Prince into the turnbuckle at every corner.
Gotta be careful with the prince though... like Tito Trinidad, both hands are lethal. ;)
Something up, sport?
I don't remember any scraps in the recent past.
Enlighten me?
I dunno what you mean bro? :confused:
Just two mate chatting about two-handed power punchers.
Do not worry about it Tito. Beanflicker is a strange one. :)
Must've unknowingly struck a nerve somewhere along the line.
I imagine that's how stalkers get started.
:)
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Back to Floyd-Naz...
They share one common opponent - Augie Sanchez. Floyd suffered a one-sided hiding against Augie. Naz sent poor Augie out the ring on a stretcher. Just facts. Fact.
Irrelevant facts...
You're better than to think that Fighter A beating Fighter B means anything about Fighter C aren't you Fenster?
Ali went life and death with Frazier, Foreman SMASHED Frazier, Ali still KO'd Foreman though... How they'd done against a common opponent meant nothing.
If you want something more relevant, Hamed and MaB shared common opponents, how did that work out for Hamed?
It's OK though, imaginary broken hands heal faster than broken egos. :p
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Floyd would want to upstage Barrera and slam Prince into the turnbuckle at every corner.
Gotta be careful with the prince though... like Tito Trinidad, both hands are lethal. ;)
Something up, sport?
I don't remember any scraps in the recent past.
Enlighten me?
I dunno what you mean bro? :confused:
Just two mate chatting about two-handed power punchers.
Do not worry about it Tito. Beanflicker is a strange one. :)
Must've unknowingly struck a nerve somewhere along the line.
I imagine that's how stalkers get started.
:)
You never heard Cormega - Get out of my Way? I thought that was the bit
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Floyd would want to upstage Barrera and slam Prince into the turnbuckle at every corner.
Gotta be careful with the prince though... like Tito Trinidad, both hands are lethal. ;)
Something up, sport?
I don't remember any scraps in the recent past.
Enlighten me?
I dunno what you mean bro? :confused:
Just two mate chatting about two-handed power punchers.
Do not worry about it Tito. Beanflicker is a strange one. :)
Must've unknowingly struck a nerve somewhere along the line.
I imagine that's how stalkers get started.
:)
You never heard Cormega - Get out of my Way? I thought that was the bit
Nah man...... sing it to us.
Better yet, upload a video.
Gotta be convincing, though.
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
You too paranoid man! Just a lyric from an old rap song, your name always reminds me of it hahah
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVk9zPpS7co
Re: Naseem Hamed v Floyd Mayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
personality sways fans opinion in boxing more than any other sport
why people love floyd so much and yet dislike naz ill never know
Naz would win by KO him in my opinion
Yeah, cos Floyd's always looked chinny and loads of people have KO'd him in the past haven't they ? :rolleyes:
I couldn't give two fucks for either of them as people, just about pure boxing ability.
floyds never been knocked out - what a fantastic analagy of the fight
how about this - In his prime Naz knocked everyone out
1 nil to me
uh, own goal I think. Floyd has been ko'd in 0% of his fights . Naz didn't knock everyone out (if I've told you once I've told you a million times, don't exaggerate. :) ) .Infact he had an 86% stoppage record , which is very impressive, but his record against "Elite" fighters is fought 1 lost 1 . Mentally, he lost his aura and He couldn't handle that so he had to retire.
Like I've said before, don't think that the Floyd back then was like the Floyd of today. Naz was a very strong , good albeit unorthodox fighter that made an absolute killing back in the day , which he deserves respect for. But do you honestly believe that Corkscrew right from his toes would've got anywhere near the chin of a guy as skilled as Floyd , bearing in mind Barrera dealt with it very comfortably?
so with the own goal, that's 2-0 to me.
bringing naz's loss to mab into a discussion is like bringing tysons loss to mcbride into a discussion
2 nil me
How do you work that out Einstein? they're totally different. Naz's loss to MAB was his first and only loss coming off a 35 fight winning streak and he was 27 years old.
Tyson was 39, had been beaten by Danny Williams in his Previous fight , had done time , drugs and all sorts of shit.
I suppose it makes sense in your World.
Don't let the facts deter you though , you just keep dredging out the same old horseshit. :rolleyes:
Both fighters careers were over before the fight
Cummon maan, you'll look daft if you try and argue naz was prime against mab