I'd say Khan because Boner cannot be held responsible for his behavior due to his low IQ. ;D
Printable View
I'd say Khan because Boner cannot be held responsible for his behavior due to his low IQ. ;D
No way..Khan is far more likeable.
Khan would win the fight if they ever fought as well.
David Haye
Broner, but it is close as both have made dicks of themselves.
The only fight I’d ever want Khan to win would be against Broner.
Though a double knockout would be my preferred option.
Bit like I want for Bellew Haye
Broner is scum, Khan just doesn't always think before he speaks
Have to say Broner. At least I can understand what Khan is saying half the time and when he loses it's usually in spectacular fashion.
I really hated Broker because of how wrong people had him. I still really hate Khan because of how wrong people still have him. "If he only had a chin...." No, he has absolutely atrocious defensive instincts. That's why he gets clipped so clean time after time. Go through his KOs and look where his hands are in each of them. It's like he hasn't had one lesson. If he can't get in and out before return fire he has no chance of avoiding being hit, he's that terrible defensively.
Broner is the bigger d-ck.
it's too close to call really. But if the question was "who is the Better Boxer or Who do I respect more as a Boxer?" the answer has to be Broner. Broner's a cunt, but he always takes on hard meaningful fights, and is one tough SOB. Khan on the other hand , talks a good game, but has frittered his career away .
if they ever fought each other, merely from a Boxing perspective , I would have to lean towards wanting Broner to win.
Khan is embarrassingly stupid and delusional but Broner is outright classless.
However, both have shown some serious balls in the ring and never swallowed, Khan goes out doing everything in his power not just to survive but kick your cunt in and Broner has taken whuppings many a "great" fighter has quit from.
Broner wins the award. They both have big mouths and have egos that write checks their body can't cash. Broner just edges out Khan because he seems to have more waste talent and tries so hard to be appealing to the masses. The weak lines after the fight, humping opponents... If he was just a humble kid and a hard worker, people would get behind him even when he lost.
I"d have to say Broner, for much of the same reasons posted above.
Khan is a whiny bitch who did everything but go down on Floyd to get himself a fight. He also bitches plenty about Brook, but in mind did everything to avoid him. His mouth writes checks his ass later has to cash.
But Broner is another story altogether. He thought he was entitled from Day One. He's obnoxious, a thug, and when boxing is done will amount to absolutely nothing. He's also Boxing's Greatest Underachiever.
I just don't see Broner as an underachiever. He was always limited. But somehow still managed to get the 2nd best ratings in the USA behind only Wilder. That seems like over achieving.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Broner is so simple minded he's comical. I can't dislike someone who makes me laugh as much as Broner has!
But I do dislike Khan. He's not stupid, he's just very unlikable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron SwansonI just don't see Broner as an underachiever. He was always limited. But somehow still managed to get the 2nd best ratings in the USA behind only Wilder. That seems like over achieving.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Are you kidding? Broner has the physical skills to have made it farther than he did. The only thing that got in his way was himself. He's a head case.... and head cases rarely make it all the way to the top. He needed a no-nonsense trainer to wring the cobwebs out of his mind and have him focus on trying to become an ATG. Broner talked too much from the beginning, and fell woefully short.
que porqueriaQuote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by Ron SwansonI just don't see Broner as an underachiever. He was always limited. But somehow still managed to get the 2nd best ratings in the USA behind only Wilder. That seems like over achieving.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Are you kidding? Broner has the physical skills to have made it farther than he did. The only thing that got in his way was himself. He's a head case.... and head cases rarely make it all the way to the top. He needed a no-nonsense trainer to wring the cobwebs out of his mind and have him focus on trying to become an ATG. Broner talked too much from the beginning, and fell woefully short.
Prime Khan beats Broner IMO. Broner/Canelo would be bizarre. We will probably see it next year when Canelo gets off the juice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustque porqueriaQuote:
Originally Posted by titofanQuote:
Originally Posted by ron swansoni just don't see broner as an underachiever. He was always limited. But somehow still managed to get the 2nd best ratings in the usa behind only wilder. That seems like over achieving.Quote:
Originally Posted by titofan
are you kidding? Broner has the physical skills to have made it farther than he did. The only thing that got in his way was himself. He's a head case.... And head cases rarely make it all the way to the top. He needed a no-nonsense trainer to wring the cobwebs out of his mind and have him focus on trying to become an atg. Broner talked too much from the beginning, and fell woefully short.
cljb