Hard and fast >:mad
I knew I shouldnt have looked at it recently
Printable View
Hard and fast >:mad
I knew I shouldnt have looked at it recently
???Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
Raitings issue,apparantly if you can run for 4 rounds against low ranked opponents,and still lose it gets you a way higher raiting then if you get in there and mix it up with higher regarded opponents and suffer a BS stoppage,and two illegal shots to the back of your head
Nice to know such an authourity makes an attempt to find out what actually happened in the fight,oh wait,they didnt bother
What the fuck are you talking about?
If you know you know,if you dont,you dontQuote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
The rankings are done by a computer Monkey nobody sits there at boxrec and analyises all the fights its just based on a mathematical formulae.
In that regard its actually more accurate than any other ranking system as it takes no account of personal opinion but is purely a statistical reflection of results. It's probably the purest ranking system there is even though some of the rankings can look a little unusual shall we say.
We shallQuote:
Originally Posted by Bilbo
Statisticly Bob Griese and Troy Aikmen were mediocre at best
They have how many Super Bowl rings between them,and are both in the HOF
Randall Cunningham will probably never see the HOF on the other hand
Careful with what you say some people live, breath and eat BoxRec. ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
Just kidding, FUCK BoxRec they had Pavlik-Taylor fighting for Cruiserweight titles the other time.
Naseem Hamed #1 all time in the Feathers rankings. :lolhaha:
Canto #10 all time... HA! :lolhaha:
Roman #6 all time.... HA! :lolhaha: