Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 131

Thread: Beatles or Stones?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #91
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2745
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    This is probably considered heresy, like criticizing God or something, but.. The Beatles had a lot of very popular songs, hence the great songwriter label. But as lyricists I'm not that impressed, there were and are plenty who are better with the words. Lennon was pretty good, Harrison had his moments, just not that many. McCartney when it came to words was and still is pretty banal for the most part. But they had some great melodies and vocal harmonies and lots of catchy tunes.

    George Martin doesn't get nearly as much credit as he should for the Beatles musical creativity and instrumentation in later years.
    Last edited by CGM; 07-19-2009 at 04:43 AM.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    402
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    The only reason why I bring this topic up is because two guys at work believe the rolling stone are better. They must be high. The stones are a great rock band but that's all they are. The Beatles are so much more. They change the world and music forever. I want to see what you cats think. Please set these guys straight.
    They were both "boy bands," but I much prefer the Stones. The Beatles were one of the earliest examples of successful mass marketing of music...

    I happen to like Led Zep better than both, though.
    "...went 12 rounds with Ali, and never took a backwards step."

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4297
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by hfahrenheit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    The only reason why I bring this topic up is because two guys at work believe the rolling stone are better. They must be high. The stones are a great rock band but that's all they are. The Beatles are so much more. They change the world and music forever. I want to see what you cats think. Please set these guys straight.
    They were both "boy bands," but I much prefer the Stones. The Beatles were one of the earliest examples of successful mass marketing of music...

    I happen to like Led Zep better than both, though.
    I think I'm probably the only person alive who is lukewarm on Led Zepplin. They have some good tunes, but they don't really do much for me. I think it's Plante's voice (sacrilege, I know).

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2745
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hfahrenheit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    The only reason why I bring this topic up is because two guys at work believe the rolling stone are better. They must be high. The stones are a great rock band but that's all they are. The Beatles are so much more. They change the world and music forever. I want to see what you cats think. Please set these guys straight.
    They were both "boy bands," but I much prefer the Stones. The Beatles were one of the earliest examples of successful mass marketing of music...

    I happen to like Led Zep better than both, though.
    I think I'm probably the only person alive who is lukewarm on Led Zepplin. They have some good tunes, but they don't really do much for me. I think it's Plante's voice (sacrilege, I know).
    You and me both. Plant I find kind of pretentious. Page is a good studio guy, but live he is pretty average.

    As for Neil Young vs the Beatles, well I thought you had it right the first time. I can go for months without hearing a Beatles song, or at least I would if I could, and not give a damn, but I go through withdrawal if I don't get my Neil.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4297
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hfahrenheit View Post

    They were both "boy bands," but I much prefer the Stones. The Beatles were one of the earliest examples of successful mass marketing of music...

    I happen to like Led Zep better than both, though.
    I think I'm probably the only person alive who is lukewarm on Led Zepplin. They have some good tunes, but they don't really do much for me. I think it's Plante's voice (sacrilege, I know).
    You and me both. Plant I find kind of pretentious. Page is a good studio guy, but live he is pretty average.

    As for Neil Young vs the Beatles, well I thought you had it right the first time. I can go for months without hearing a Beatles song, or at least I would if I could, and not give a damn, but I go through withdrawal if I don't get my Neil.
    All things being equal and ignoring all outside factors like influence etc. I would probably have Neil Young close to the Beatles in terms of my preferences. There are many times that I would choose NY over the Beatles without hesitation, perhaps even the majority of the time (for example, I have two Neil Young albums on my MP3 player and no Beatles), but I still love the Beatles. One mitigating factor is that I've heard almost every easily accessible (alubms + singles) Beatles song that I am somewhat sick of hearing almost all of them, so it's hard to gauge how much I really like them.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2745
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post

    I think I'm probably the only person alive who is lukewarm on Led Zepplin. They have some good tunes, but they don't really do much for me. I think it's Plante's voice (sacrilege, I know).
    You and me both. Plant I find kind of pretentious. Page is a good studio guy, but live he is pretty average.

    As for Neil Young vs the Beatles, well I thought you had it right the first time. I can go for months without hearing a Beatles song, or at least I would if I could, and not give a damn, but I go through withdrawal if I don't get my Neil.
    All things being equal and ignoring all outside factors like influence etc. I would probably have Neil Young close to the Beatles in terms of my preferences. There are many times that I would choose NY over the Beatles without hesitation, perhaps even the majority of the time (for example, I have two Neil Young albums on my MP3 player and no Beatles), but I still love the Beatles. One mitigating factor is that I've heard almost every easily accessible (alubms + singles) Beatles song that I am somewhat sick of hearing almost all of them, so it's hard to gauge how much I really like them.
    Neil is a Canadian icon for sure, they love him here. I've seen maybe half a dozen of his shows over the years, arena shows that are always packed to the rafters, and the crowd is always very responsive.

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4297
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post

    You and me both. Plant I find kind of pretentious. Page is a good studio guy, but live he is pretty average.

    As for Neil Young vs the Beatles, well I thought you had it right the first time. I can go for months without hearing a Beatles song, or at least I would if I could, and not give a damn, but I go through withdrawal if I don't get my Neil.
    All things being equal and ignoring all outside factors like influence etc. I would probably have Neil Young close to the Beatles in terms of my preferences. There are many times that I would choose NY over the Beatles without hesitation, perhaps even the majority of the time (for example, I have two Neil Young albums on my MP3 player and no Beatles), but I still love the Beatles. One mitigating factor is that I've heard almost every easily accessible (alubms + singles) Beatles song that I am somewhat sick of hearing almost all of them, so it's hard to gauge how much I really like them.
    Neil is a Canadian icon for sure, they love him here. I've seen maybe half a dozen of his shows over the years, arena shows that are always packed to the rafters, and the crowd is always very responsive.
    I saw him in Vancouver last year and it was easily one of the best shows I have ever seen. He pretty much sold out GM Place, which is pretty impressive. Not bad for a guy who suffered an aneurysm not long ago and who is well into his 7th decade (no pun intended). Matter of fact, I think I'll put on Rust Never Sleeps right now.

    Interestingly enough, he did a great cover of A Day in the Life as his final song.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    2,415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    I'd pick the Stones any day, 'Jumping Jack Flash' is one of my favourite songs.

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    I'd pick the Beatles any day as they had more talent than the Stones. Paul and John were the backbone of the Beatles and to this day Paul can write some great songs. I like the Stones but feel that talent wise the Beatles win my vote.

    It's hard to compare the two bands, as their styles were so different. CCR and The Doors are 2 other favorites of mine.
    Last edited by boxinggirl; 07-23-2009 at 01:18 AM.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2838
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    The Stones out of the two but that's because I was raised on them with my mom. I'd take the Grateful Dead over either though.

  11. #101
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2745
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    A friend of the devil is a friend of mine.

  12. #102
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Stones for me.

  13. #103
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2745
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by rocky55 View Post
    Stones for me.
    Hey, good call. Welcome to the monkey house. Get your first 100 posts done fast, there's plenty of fun to be had on the hidden board.

  14. #104
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rocky55 View Post
    Stones for me.
    Hey, good call. Welcome to the monkey house. Get your first 100 posts done fast, there's plenty of fun to be had on the hidden board.
    thanks bro. music and boxing are my favorites.

  15. #105
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Red face Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rocky55 View Post
    Stones for me.
    Hey, good call. Welcome to the monkey house. Get your first 100 posts done fast, there's plenty of fun to be had on the hidden board.
    Hell, I'm trying to get to 30 so I can edit my profile.
    Last edited by boxinggirl; 07-25-2009 at 09:41 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Tonsil Stones (kinda gross)
    By TheChosenOne in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-30-2008, 12:17 PM
  2. BEATLES FANS - CHECK DIS OUT!!!
    By smashup in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-03-2008, 04:44 AM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 10:14 PM
  4. Beatles..Yellow Submarine-full film here
    By smashup in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-15-2007, 09:34 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing