Re: Top five reasons why boxing will always be better than MMA
I'll watch MMA if it's on, it is entertaining. I certainly don't put any effort forth to see who's who
and I won't pay for a PPV. I don't really dig the ground game, I can appreciate the skill and
athleticism of it, it just doesn't interest me. But if it's on I'll watch.
Boxing is my first love, I want to know about the fighters, It still gets my heart racing when
a close match comes on.
I can definately see where NEW, YOUNGER or CASUAL fans would choose MMA over boxing. The politics
are WAAAAYY dumbed down (a good thing) in MMA. You can say this guy is the Heavyweight champ
(I think it's Randy Couture for the UFC), you can't really do that in boxing (Unless there is a big 4 alpha-unification) We could all agree that WLAD is the best heavyweight there (although I know we don't just say for argument we do) When all is said and done Wlad is 25% Heavyweight champ, Oleg is 25% Heavyweight champ,Ruslan is 25% Heavyweight champ and Sultan is 25% Heavyweight champ.
Then we have boxing with 17 weight classes and 4 champs per weight class 68 potential champs total
that is far too many to know about, UFC has 5 weight classes and 1 champ per weight class.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Bookmarks