Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1505
    Cool Clicks

    Default WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    WBC mandatories decided!
    By Boxing Bob Newman(Fightnews.com)
    Mandatory defenses were the long awaited order of Day 4 at the WBC convention. Discussions were had concerning everything from purse bid dates to mandatory periods and a myriad of other related topics. The following is an attempt to present a semi-clear view of what transpired...

    Super Feather: Vacant
    Interim champ Humberto Soto has not paid his sanctioning fees from his last fight with Francisco Lorenzo. The WBC will insist that those fees be paid within fifteen days otherwise Soto will be stripped. In the meantime, #1 Urbano Antilon will meet #3 Thong Por Chokchai for the first mandatory position and #4 Rocky Juarez will meet #5 Humberto Mauro Gutierrez for the second mandatory.

    Light:
    Manny Pacquiao must first pay his past due $30,000 sanctioning fee from his title winning effort against David Diaz withing fifteen days from now. Secondly, he is required by WBC rules as a reigning champion fighting above the weight, to pay a 1% fee from the purse for his upcoming fight with Oscar DeLaHoya on December 6, 2008. If he fails to pay the $30,000 fee first and on time, he will be stripped. In the meantime, #1 Edwin Valero and #2 Antonio Pitalua will clash for the interim title.

    Super Light:
    Champion Timothy Bradley has a mandatory defense due May 10, 2009. Don King wants his charge Devon Alexander to be the next challenger for Bradley. Gary Shaw and Alex Camponovo want their charge Bradley to have a voluntary defense against the winner of the December clash for the WBO belt between Ricardo Torres and Kendall Holt. The WBC does not want that fight to be for the WBO belt, only for the WBC belt and only if the winner agree to fight the mandatory WBC challenger, be it Alexander, the winner of #2 Junior Witter and #3 Ajose Olusegun eliminator or an eliminator between #1 Alexander and #2 Witter.


    Middle:
    Kelly Pavlik has also not paid his past sanctioning fees from both the optional defense against Gary Lockett and the catchweight fight versus Bernard Hopkins. The 15 day deadline will apply for Pavlik to pay, lest he be stripped of his title. His mandatory is Marco Antonio Rubio.


    Heavy:
    Vitali Klitschko recently regained the title he never lost in the ring by vanquishing reigning champion Samuel Peter. As a condition of the negotiations that went into making that fight, Klitschko was not given the option of a voluntary defense in the event that he won. Current mandatory #1 contender Juan Carlos Gomez has won two elimination matches (against Oliver McCall and Vladimir Virchis) and has been awaiting his chance patiently to challenge for the WBC heavyweight title, regardless of who held it. The WBC unanimously voted to grant Gomez his title fight immediately against Klitschko. No requests for a voluntary defense will be granted. As Champion Emeritus, Klitschko was granted a special privilege to try and regain his crown and now the WBC wants to follow its own rules and not keep the mandatory challengers waiting any longer.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    593
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    860
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    Pavlik already got stripped and ass raped by hopkins.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    186
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    Quote Originally Posted by awdleyfuturehalloffamer View Post
    Pavlik already got stripped and ass raped by hopkins.
    LOL its funny cause its true

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Charlottetown, Canada
    Posts
    2,292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2538
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    Why would Pavlik have to pay them for the Hopkins fight?

    If I was Pavlik I would dump the WBC belt.

    The WBC are nothing but a bunch or crooks.
    Last edited by Deanrw; 11-06-2008 at 05:15 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    Weird,the sanctioning fees are supposed to come directly out of purse. Me smells a manager who's double dipping. Most of the time you dont even discuss sanctioning fees when you negotiate, its an assumed.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Charlottetown, Canada
    Posts
    2,292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2538
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Weird,the sanctioning fees are supposed to come directly out of purse. Me smells a manager who's double dipping. Most of the time you dont even discuss sanctioning fees when you negotiate, its an assumed.
    Why would there be a sanctioning fee for Hopkins/Pavlik? It was not for any title.

    Even the Lockett fight was a WBO mandatory. Did the WBC even sanction it?

    Now the WBC wants $150,000 from Pac for fighting Oscar? time for another belt to be dumped.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1505
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    The WBC demands 1% of their champions purses for non-title fights. If you remember there was a story about how pissed Pavlik was when he fought Taylor the second time because he had to pay the WBC 30K.


    Also there is no way Pac man is giving the WBC 1% of his De la Hoya purse. You better believe he will drop that belt.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    232
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    930
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    Quote Originally Posted by Deanrw View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Weird,the sanctioning fees are supposed to come directly out of purse. Me smells a manager who's double dipping. Most of the time you dont even discuss sanctioning fees when you negotiate, its an assumed.
    Why would there be a sanctioning fee for Hopkins/Pavlik? It was not for any title.

    Even the Lockett fight was a WBO mandatory. Did the WBC even sanction it?

    Now the WBC wants $150,000 from Pac for fighting Oscar? time for another belt to be dumped.
    My guess is they organizations view voluntary defenses as a champions break from their belt. They want to be "reimbursed" for their belt not earning potential money for the duration of training and recovery of the champion after a non title match.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1460
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    Quote Originally Posted by lance Uppercut View Post
    WBC mandatories decided!
    By Boxing Bob Newman(Fightnews.com)
    Mandatory defenses were the long awaited order of Day 4 at the WBC convention. Discussions were had concerning everything from purse bid dates to mandatory periods and a myriad of other related topics. The following is an attempt to present a semi-clear view of what transpired...

    Super Feather: Vacant
    Interim champ Humberto Soto has not paid his sanctioning fees from his last fight with Francisco Lorenzo. The WBC will insist that those fees be paid within fifteen days otherwise Soto will be stripped. In the meantime, #1 Urbano Antilon will meet #3 Thong Por Chokchai for the first mandatory position and #4 Rocky Juarez will meet #5 Humberto Mauro Gutierrez for the second mandatory.

    Light:
    Manny Pacquiao must first pay his past due $30,000 sanctioning fee from his title winning effort against David Diaz withing fifteen days from now. Secondly, he is required by WBC rules as a reigning champion fighting above the weight, to pay a 1% fee from the purse for his upcoming fight with Oscar DeLaHoya on December 6, 2008. If he fails to pay the $30,000 fee first and on time, he will be stripped. In the meantime, #1 Edwin Valero and #2 Antonio Pitalua will clash for the interim title.

    Super Light:
    Champion Timothy Bradley has a mandatory defense due May 10, 2009. Don King wants his charge Devon Alexander to be the next challenger for Bradley. Gary Shaw and Alex Camponovo want their charge Bradley to have a voluntary defense against the winner of the December clash for the WBO belt between Ricardo Torres and Kendall Holt. The WBC does not want that fight to be for the WBO belt, only for the WBC belt and only if the winner agree to fight the mandatory WBC challenger, be it Alexander, the winner of #2 Junior Witter and #3 Ajose Olusegun eliminator or an eliminator between #1 Alexander and #2 Witter.


    Middle:
    Kelly Pavlik has also not paid his past sanctioning fees from both the optional defense against Gary Lockett and the catchweight fight versus Bernard Hopkins. The 15 day deadline will apply for Pavlik to pay, lest he be stripped of his title. His mandatory is Marco Antonio Rubio.


    Heavy:
    Vitali Klitschko recently regained the title he never lost in the ring by vanquishing reigning champion Samuel Peter. As a condition of the negotiations that went into making that fight, Klitschko was not given the option of a voluntary defense in the event that he won. Current mandatory #1 contender Juan Carlos Gomez has won two elimination matches (against Oliver McCall and Vladimir Virchis) and has been awaiting his chance patiently to challenge for the WBC heavyweight title, regardless of who held it. The WBC unanimously voted to grant Gomez his title fight immediately against Klitschko. No requests for a voluntary defense will be granted. As Champion Emeritus, Klitschko was granted a special privilege to try and regain his crown and now the WBC wants to follow its own rules and not keep the mandatory challengers waiting any longer.

    WBC what a bunch or crooks.

    If you ever wanted a good reason to only go after the Ring belt look above.
    Balls

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4955
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    Sulaiman what a crook...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    45,555
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5034
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    Humberto Soto should Fed-ex his bill to Cortez.....marked payment due.

    Someday.....gods willing,the swindlers heading these alphabet belt boyz will over regulate themselves out of existence.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,786
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3559
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    This is the part of boxing I seriously don't understand. All the belts and how they work. It gives me a headache.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1215
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    And if I were Pacquiao or Pavlik, I'd tell the WBC they can have their worthless belts back.

    One day, these sanctioning bodies will realize that belts mean absolutely nothing to star fighters these days. The only belts that have any legitimacy are the Ring belts, and that's because those belts are not about making money from fees, those belts are based on a fighter proving his dominance in a division.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Levittown PA
    Posts
    1,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1320
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    I personally can't believe the Vitali circumstance. They allow Vitali to challenge for the belt but now since Gomez has been waiting so patiently he get's a shot. Why couldn't they have said no to Klitschko and yes to Gomez to fight Peter. Money talk's I guess.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2471
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC on the verge of stripping Pacquiao and Pavlik

    The sanctioning bodies are just a cheeky bunch of robbing bastards these days, something really does need to be done about it IMO

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Girl caught stripping by mom
    By Douglas in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-30-2008, 03:03 PM
  2. COTTO , PACQUIAO and PAVLIK - BOXING’S BIG THREE!
    By XaduBoxer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-13-2008, 02:59 AM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-22-2007, 06:06 PM
  4. Mundine on verge of greatness!!
    By chum112 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-07-2007, 05:25 AM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-04-2007, 08:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing