Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 42 of 42

Thread: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,718
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

    Khantucky fried chicken - Prescott
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kent, England
    Posts
    989
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    743
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by armyash View Post
    CLITschko x2

    CLITschko x2?

    there 2 of them

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    I liked my conamoyor for casamayor but I got in a lot of trouble for saying that. This was to have a stab at vd for always getting at khan.
    <br />
    <br />
    The problem with Conamoyor was it was used after the man had already been a multiple champion and had established his Hall of Fame credentials. <img src="images/smilies/vd.gif" border="0" alt="" title="vd" smilieid="340" class="inlineimg" /><br />
    <br />
    I personally liked <br />
    <br />
    Rey Bumtista<br />
    Manny Pacneedle<br />
    Joe Crapzaghe (I'll admit Joe made Crapzaghe mute after the Kessler fight. Thank God he provided me with Cokezaghe and Crackzaghe to take it's place)<br />
    Enzo Maccraparinelli
    <br />
    <br />Well surely khan isn't con anymore after a string of good wins and securing the title? He's also proved he can take a dig better after maidana ! Or is he still con?
    He would of been rid of it already. But the way he's shamelessly ducking Prescott while still needing an opponent makes him keep it.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    45,704
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5040
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

    Bobby "why dont mama hug ME like that" Pacquiao
    Last edited by Spicoli; 01-27-2011 at 04:02 AM.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4958
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

    Off the top of my head... That I know I've used some I came up with some I just read somewhere on here.

    Izzy
    PongsaShit
    RuPaul Williams
    JFat
    Rafa
    Aladdin (Naz)
    Tony "PP" Margarito (Plaster of Paris)
    Snaggletooth (Hopkins)
    Marshmellow Man (Butterbean)
    Gollum (Maussa)
    Peanut Head (Tarver)
    CalzSlappy (Calzaghe)
    Powder (Pavlik)
    Beaky Buzzard (Darchinyan)
    Pernell Shitaker
    Sugar Gay Leonard
    Cory Stinks

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1800
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Vd- how is he ducking a lucky and overrated Prescott? Fighting mcclosky or Murray is a lot more challenging than a beatable Prescott. Khan was a cocky arrogant fighter back then and he has matured under freddy so much. If you don't believe he would beat the telegraphic slugger Prescott then you are stupid. He just went to war in fight of the year with a much better fighter in maidana. Do you think fighting Prescott who just got schooled by mitchell would prove that much? Khan has proved he's miles ahead of Prescott and you know that! It's not even like Prescott brings a title or anything to the table instead of a lucky win over khan which was the best thing that happened to Khans career. I'm not saying i wouldn't watch the fight, however I'd much prefer mcclosky or Murray. I just can't believe you think he's ducking him when he's just beaten a much better fighter in maidana, it makes no sense
    Last edited by Tam Seddon; 01-27-2011 at 11:37 AM.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1350
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Vd- how is he ducking a lucky and overrated Prescott? Fighting mcclosky or Murray is a lot more challenging than a beatable Prescott. Khan was a cocky arrogant fighter back then and he has matured under freddy so much. If you don't believe he would beat the telegraphic slugger Prescott then you are stupid. He just went to war in fight of the year with a much better fighter in maidana. Do you think fighting Prescott who just got schooled by mitchell would prove that much? Khan has proved he's miles ahead of Prescott and you know that! It's not even like Prescott brings a title or anything to the table instead of a lucky win over khan which was the best thing that happened to Khans career. I'm not saying i wouldn't watch the fight, however I'd much prefer mcclosky or Murray. I just can't believe you think he's ducking him when he's just beaten a much better fighter in maidana, it makes no sense
    I don't think he's ducking him, but what does beating McCloskey do or his career? At least destroying Prescott will wipe his slate clean. I'd much rather see him avenge Prescott than see him fight a guy who keeps his hands so low. Khan will murder McCloskey within 3 rounds IMO. He might do the same to Prescott, but at least there'd be a purpose to it.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,542
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    889
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

    Quote Originally Posted by armyash View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by armyash View Post
    CLITschko x2

    CLITschko x2?

    there 2 of them
    is there?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1800
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Vd- how is he ducking a lucky and overrated Prescott? Fighting mcclosky or Murray is a lot more challenging than a beatable Prescott. Khan was a cocky arrogant fighter back then and he has matured under freddy so much. If you don't believe he would beat the telegraphic slugger Prescott then you are stupid. He just went to war in fight of the year with a much better fighter in maidana. Do you think fighting Prescott who just got schooled by mitchell would prove that much? Khan has proved he's miles ahead of Prescott and you know that! It's not even like Prescott brings a title or anything to the table instead of a lucky win over khan which was the best thing that happened to Khans career. I'm not saying i wouldn't watch the fight, however I'd much prefer mcclosky or Murray. I just can't believe you think he's ducking him when he's just beaten a much better fighter in maidana, it makes no sense
    I don't think he's ducking him, but what does beating McCloskey do or his career? At least destroying Prescott will wipe his slate clean. I'd much rather see him avenge Prescott than see him fight a guy who keeps his hands so low. Khan will murder McCloskey within 3 rounds IMO. He might do the same to Prescott, but at least there'd be a purpose to it.
    McCloskey is still a name in the UK, its just a keep busy fight and as i said before i still would watch a prescott fight. i just dont see how khans ducking him? thats a stupid comment! khans waiting for the winner of bradley alexander hes got a lot bigger fish to fry than prescott. Hes proved hes miles better than prescott with beating maidana in a war. weather the fight is murray, mcclosky or prescott khan will win. its all working towards the winner of the big fight this weekend.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1350
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Vd- how is he ducking a lucky and overrated Prescott? Fighting mcclosky or Murray is a lot more challenging than a beatable Prescott. Khan was a cocky arrogant fighter back then and he has matured under freddy so much. If you don't believe he would beat the telegraphic slugger Prescott then you are stupid. He just went to war in fight of the year with a much better fighter in maidana. Do you think fighting Prescott who just got schooled by mitchell would prove that much? Khan has proved he's miles ahead of Prescott and you know that! It's not even like Prescott brings a title or anything to the table instead of a lucky win over khan which was the best thing that happened to Khans career. I'm not saying i wouldn't watch the fight, however I'd much prefer mcclosky or Murray. I just can't believe you think he's ducking him when he's just beaten a much better fighter in maidana, it makes no sense
    I don't think he's ducking him, but what does beating McCloskey do or his career? At least destroying Prescott will wipe his slate clean. I'd much rather see him avenge Prescott than see him fight a guy who keeps his hands so low. Khan will murder McCloskey within 3 rounds IMO. He might do the same to Prescott, but at least there'd be a purpose to it.
    McCloskey is still a name in the UK, its just a keep busy fight and as i said before i still would watch a prescott fight. i just dont see how khans ducking him? thats a stupid comment! khans waiting for the winner of bradley alexander hes got a lot bigger fish to fry than prescott. Hes proved hes miles better than prescott with beating maidana in a war. weather the fight is murray, mcclosky or prescott khan will win. its all working towards the winner of the big fight this weekend.
    I agree with that. I don't think he's ducking him. But for me, there is more purpose to fighting Prescott than McCloskey. I'd bet more of the average joe public know who Prescott is more than McCloskey. I'd be stunned if he took the Murray fight because the fight is in Manchester and I could see Murray bringing more supporters thus making Khan the bad guy in his own back yard.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1800
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    Vd- how is he ducking a lucky and overrated Prescott? Fighting mcclosky or Murray is a lot more challenging than a beatable Prescott. Khan was a cocky arrogant fighter back then and he has matured under freddy so much. If you don't believe he would beat the telegraphic slugger Prescott then you are stupid. He just went to war in fight of the year with a much better fighter in maidana. Do you think fighting Prescott who just got schooled by mitchell would prove that much? Khan has proved he's miles ahead of Prescott and you know that! It's not even like Prescott brings a title or anything to the table instead of a lucky win over khan which was the best thing that happened to Khans career. I'm not saying i wouldn't watch the fight, however I'd much prefer mcclosky or Murray. I just can't believe you think he's ducking him when he's just beaten a much better fighter in maidana, it makes no sense
    I don't think he's ducking him, but what does beating McCloskey do or his career? At least destroying Prescott will wipe his slate clean. I'd much rather see him avenge Prescott than see him fight a guy who keeps his hands so low. Khan will murder McCloskey within 3 rounds IMO. He might do the same to Prescott, but at least there'd be a purpose to it.
    McCloskey is still a name in the UK, its just a keep busy fight and as i said before i still would watch a prescott fight. i just dont see how khans ducking him? thats a stupid comment! khans waiting for the winner of bradley alexander hes got a lot bigger fish to fry than prescott. Hes proved hes miles better than prescott with beating maidana in a war. weather the fight is murray, mcclosky or prescott khan will win. its all working towards the winner of the big fight this weekend.
    I agree with that. I don't think he's ducking him. But for me, there is more purpose to fighting Prescott than McCloskey. I'd bet more of the average joe public know who Prescott is more than McCloskey. I'd be stunned if he took the Murray fight because the fight is in Manchester and I could see Murray bringing more supporters thus making Khan the bad guy in his own back yard.
    im thinking the mcclosky fight is going to happen but yes i wouldnt mind seeing khan avenge the loss but hes not ducking him for sure. silly comment by vd just trying to have a pop at khan as always!

  12. #42
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kent, England
    Posts
    989
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    743
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Interesting names saddo's give boxers

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by armyash View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by armyash View Post
    CLITschko x2

    CLITschko x2?

    there 2 of them
    is there?

    no

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. very interesting article on boxers that dont know when to quit
    By HattonTheHammer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-10-2010, 09:13 PM
  2. What are VERY some strange names of boxers?
    By holmcall in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-07-2008, 12:26 AM
  3. **Boxers... What alias whould you give them TODAY!?!**
    By PRIDE OF BOSTON in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-24-2007, 03:34 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-04-2006, 08:03 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing