Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 52

Thread: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Fight officially announced , M.E.N arena Manchester 16/04/2011

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,355
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1332
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Ketchup.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    714
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Another fight to prove the WBA belt is less than ibo and European. And especially as khan is fighting a non or not well ranked fighter, and everyone khan fan will get their tongues willingly brown where as froch fights the best and gets screwed because warren pays sky to ignore.

    Puke, dogshit and politics combind with me not flushing the bog

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1350
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Another fight to prove the WBA belt is less than ibo and European. And especially as khan is fighting a non or not well ranked fighter, and everyone khan fan will get their tongues willingly brown where as froch fights the best and gets screwed because warren pays sky to ignore.

    Puke, dogshit and politics combind with me not flushing the bog
    #1 Why would Warren pay Sky when Khan left him for Golden Boy?
    #2 Not well ranked? McCloskey has a high WBC ranking and is the European Champion.
    #3 Why would a "World title" be less than the IBO or European title, and if this is the case, then why is the European Champion risking vacating his belt for a shot at the WBA Champion.
    #4 Froch does fight the best, but Khan just beat one of the division's best in Maidana and has a pretty decent record at 140lbs. His next fight after this will almost certainly against the divisions #1 so this will just be a tune up.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1718
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Nice, I bet this fight turns out being better than alot of you(who just watch big fights and dont know shit about up and commers) think.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    849
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Khan:

    This is a matchup the British public want to see and will be a fantastic fight between two of the best light welterweights in the country."
    No it isn't.
    Last edited by boxingbantz; 02-06-2011 at 03:29 AM.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Peak District
    Posts
    2,036
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    852
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Khan:

    This is a matchup the British public want to see and will be a fantastic fight between two of the best light welterweights in the country."
    No it isn't.
    No one else at Light Welter in this country pal. So I say yes it is.....

    Good fight IMO. McCloskey can be an awkward fukka. Better fight than the Peterson fight for me...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,706
    Mentioned
    1669 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    The fact that this is ppv means it is a waste of space.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    849
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by TheMacMagician View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Khan:

    This is a matchup the British public want to see and will be a fantastic fight between two of the best light welterweights in the country."
    No it isn't.
    No one else at Light Welter in this country pal. So I say yes it is.....

    Good fight IMO. McCloskey can be an awkward fukka. Better fight than the Peterson fight for me...
    I should've highlighted the 'This is a matchup the British public want to see...'

    The public wanted to see him fight either Prescott or Murray.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sunderland, England
    Posts
    1,705
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    815
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,706
    Mentioned
    1669 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
    This should be free as a taster for his next fight which should be against Bradley, that would be worth ppv.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    I guess this is a stay busy fight for the champion.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    849
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    The ONLY way I will pay for this is if John Murray fights Jorge Linares on the undercard.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Peak District
    Posts
    2,036
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    852
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    The ONLY way I will pay for this is if John Murray fights Jorge Linares on the undercard.
    Would be a good fight that. Word over twitter is that Murray has big news this week. Hope so. The guy deserves his shot. Come on Mick, pull yer finger out.

    I'm gonna go to this fight for sure, I like the match-up.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,542
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    889
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
    why wouldnt you pay for it? what are you gonna do instead?

    id like to have seen him fight witter

    much better opponent that peterson or ortiz
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 45
    Last Post: 02-04-2011, 06:02 PM
  2. Khan v McCloskey
    By erics44 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-20-2011, 03:57 PM
  3. Anyone Heard Of Paul McCloskey
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-16-2009, 02:02 PM
  4. Colin Lynes - Paul McCloskey
    By Phil in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-03-2008, 11:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing