Re: Roberto Duran vs Julio Cesar Chavez @ Lightweight
Awesome matchup between two all time greats.
I think Chavez was as tough as a piece of iron. Cold, methodical and ruthless, he applied constant pressure and was one of the best body punchers I've seen. Good chin (susceptible to cuts later on in his career, but let's assume that's not a factor here). Solid technique, but he could be frustrated by slick boxers and Duran would have a definite edge in speed here.
Duran, at lightweight was supreme ... a real 'monstor for his weight' and probably the preeminent fighter of the 1970's. Loved fighting, and was entertainingly savage but had vastly underestimated boxing skills. A concussive puncher with a good chin.
Oddly enough, I think that if Hands of Stone came out boxing, controlling distance and pace as we know he can, I suspect he out points Chavez 8 times out of ten. He had the slicker skills and that plays to Julio's relative lack of speed.
There's no way that would happen, though. These two proud warriors would be absolutely hyped by the Mexico/Panama confrontation and would throw all caution to the wind and engage in a wild slugfest.
It would be something of a pick 'em fight, I have to say.
If I had to get off the fence, I would favour Duran simply because his best weight was lightweight while Chavez was better at higher poundages. Duran also had the edge in speed, and against Chavez, speed kills.'
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Bookmarks