Originally Posted by
ross
Originally Posted by
jon09
Originally Posted by
ross
Your making a twat of yourself
If he beats Browne which he deserves the chance of fighting if Julius Long and Chauncy Welliver do
Areola is a big name. Who has he beaten?
Twat
Not to put myself on the twat train. But that is the point, they are C+ fighters who have fought C- and D- opposition with a little bit of extra credit. And would probably give us an A type fight. Sorry for the grade school analogy but I try to keep it simple. I think it is the perfect fight for both and the fans on either side of the pond. Heck I can even see a trilogy out of it.
My point is that all champions need opponents and Chisora is a very good opponent. His showing against Tyson Fury shouldnt be held against him as both their future fights will show Fury has improved massively and is fulfilling the potential Steward saw in him andthat Chisora is still a very good fighter.
Primo, if you think im typing my replies with an angry face youd be very wrong.
This is me
This is everyone else
You keep telling yourself that mate, and you'll be fine.
my point is , and as previously stated by Master , after Chisora's fight with Fury, he doesn't merit a fight for any title. Naturally, you will put this down to the Phenomenon that is Tyson! I don't necessarily buy that, and as usual with you, it is all conjecture at the moment.
Frank Warren has worked a minor miracle keeping Chisora relevant and giving him decent pay days.
And by the way, you previously mentioned whether Arreola was worthy, which was strange because I do believe that he KO'd Joey Abell in the 1st round 4 years ago, and in doing so, he softened him up for Fury to beat in his last but one fight . Strangely enough , it took Tyson 4 rounds to finish him off, so going by your usual line of comparison that makes Arreola better than Tyson!!!
Bookmarks