Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: The reason we have weight classes in boxing

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The reason we have weight classes in boxing

    yes that gap would be bridged

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,542
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    889
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The reason we have weight classes in boxing

    Heavyweight has to be the top division

    you cant have super heavyweight champions because that will make all previous heavyweight champions not as good
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  3. #18
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: The reason we have weight classes in boxing

    Brockton, you DO realize that Tyson Fury has said that Wladimir Klitschko is a "blown up cruiserweight"?

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,355
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1332
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The reason we have weight classes in boxing

    Yeah do you realise he said that to make sure Klitschko knows that Tyson is naturally bigger than him.

    Whether that is actual truth or not I do not know.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The reason we have weight classes in boxing

    well fury is a fuckwit then. 6 foot 7 250 pounds is a superheavyweight

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1047
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The reason we have weight classes in boxing

    There ways to many division right now we really don't need more weight classes i mean look at the man posting Holyfeild not size its talent and right now there is lack of it. We had a sh and it was a joke class and fucking butterbean had the belt i mean shit dude we don't need that shit in boxing. Wald big but he has beat bigger guys with more ease if you ever watch his fights. I wish Usa would get another champ in there but Wilder i am not holding my breath on at all guy 100 years old has barley fought a living oppent.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    616
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The reason we have weight classes in boxing

    There have always been big guys. The difference now is that the division is so bad that size isn't the issue. The issue is that nobody is good. Look at haye. He wasn't big and won some rounds against wlad and he isn't even that good. Imagine someone his size who actually fought and was a really good fighter.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. If we had the original 8 weight classes right now....
    By El Kabong in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-01-2009, 07:09 PM
  2. If there were only the original weight classes...
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-01-2009, 12:34 PM
  3. amatuer weight classes
    By adbrand in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-07-2006, 05:15 AM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-15-2006, 07:23 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing