Horrible rematch imo, the first fight was really good, but only competitive for a couple of rounds. Pascal was fucked early, fought out of his skin to get through it and land his best punches, couldn't hurt Kovalev with them and then got flattened. At the absolute best it would be a repeat of that, the way I see it, so what's the point. Pascal-Stevenson would be a much more interesting fight.
Yeah.... Pascal should fight Stevenson before he gets permanently ruined by Kovalev.
Pascal and Stevenson live in the same city for crying out loud, that should be a no brainer of a fight to make and I have to imagine its Stevenson who doesn't want it, nothing else makes much sense.
Stevenson v Pascal makes sense but Kovalev is the best light heavyweight.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
I never thought for a second RJJ could improve Pascal. RJJ was a reflex phenom, not a textbook boxer. How can he teach one to throw 4 left hooks in a row?
All's lost! Everything's going to shit!
I think Pascal was trying to model himself after RJJ whether he was there in his corner or not. It was pretty apparent. In that respect, i guess i see the point in trying to get advice from the guy who had more success with it that you did. Im not sure if it was more practical application or theory though. I dont know how much one camp can do either. Roy seems to umm... "dabble" in training. Between vargas, and pascal..... i dont know if there is someone whos corner hes in all the time every time. Which he really should if he wants to be a trainer. maybe after hes done fighting.
They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.
Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks