Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  2
Likes Likes:  38
Dislikes Dislikes:  1
Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 112

Thread: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Exactly. He never avenges his admittedly close losses. He's doing this one because at 154 there are men who know they can beat him and 160 is GGG. He cannot go up or down without taking a lot of heat. GGG could rematch Jacobs or move up and people would say 'Cool'. He's nothing to prove. Canelo has a lot to prove as there are question marks aplenty.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    813
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    By agreeing to May GGG is letting Canelo dictate the conditions.
    That’s because Canelo is the A side and he can go elsewhere. What’s GGG going to do, Fight Jacobs again for a lot less money and Potentially lose? Of course not he’ll wait for the super-welterweight like a good boy.
    So Canelo can go elsewhere can he? So where exactly are all these options?
    None of them are options he WANTS to take.
    He can fight any of the guys who are fighting tonight at a catch weight

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    813
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    Exactly. He never avenges his admittedly close losses. He's doing this one because at 154 there are men who know they can beat him and 160 is GGG. He cannot go up or down without taking a lot of heat. GGG could rematch Jacobs or move up and people would say 'Cool'. He's nothing to prove. Canelo has a lot to prove as there are question marks aplenty.

    Golovkin has plenty to prove! He blatantly avoided Ward and waited for Alvarez to move up to fight him and when he did GGG failed to beat him. Then there was the close and debatable win against Jacobs. The only two good fighters he fought arguably both beat him so he has plenty to prove at the top level.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    584
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    He didn’t lose and has only lost once (check the record books) Golovkin should give Jacobs a rematch instead trying to fight Cotto (another smaller man)
    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    Golovkin has plenty to prove! He blatantly avoided Ward and waited for Alvarez to move up to fight him and when he did GGG failed to beat him. Then there was the close and debatable win against Jacobs. The only two good fighters he fought arguably both beat him so he has plenty to prove at the top level.
    Check the record books Gamo, neither of them beat him.

    If GGG has something to prove against Jacobs then why don't you accept that Canelo has something to prove against Lara and Trout?

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    813
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    He didn’t lose and has only lost once (check the record books) Golovkin should give Jacobs a rematch instead trying to fight Cotto (another smaller man)
    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    Golovkin has plenty to prove! He blatantly avoided Ward and waited for Alvarez to move up to fight him and when he did GGG failed to beat him. Then there was the close and debatable win against Jacobs. The only two good fighters he fought arguably both beat him so he has plenty to prove at the top level.
    Check the record books Gamo, neither of them beat him.

    If GGG has something to prove against Jacobs then why don't you accept that Canelo has something to prove against Lara and Trout?
    Because Canelo isn’t fighting at 154 anymore. Trout has lost three of his last six and will probably be beaten again tonight. Lara is on a nice run but unless he wants to move up to 160 there’s no reason it should happen.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    584
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    He didn’t lose and has only lost once (check the record books) Golovkin should give Jacobs a rematch instead trying to fight Cotto (another smaller man)
    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    Golovkin has plenty to prove! He blatantly avoided Ward and waited for Alvarez to move up to fight him and when he did GGG failed to beat him. Then there was the close and debatable win against Jacobs. The only two good fighters he fought arguably both beat him so he has plenty to prove at the top level.
    Check the record books Gamo, neither of them beat him.

    If GGG has something to prove against Jacobs then why don't you accept that Canelo has something to prove against Lara and Trout?
    Because Canelo isn’t fighting at 154 anymore. Trout has lost three of his last six and will probably be beaten again tonight. Lara is on a nice run but unless he wants to move up to 160 there’s no reason it should happen.
    And so because Canelo isn't fighting at 154 that means he isn't avoiding them and he has nothing to prove
    Canelo fought at SWW just 12 months ago, I'm sure that he could have quite easily arranged one of his beloved catchweights.
    Canelo could have gave Lara a rematch at any point before he moved up to MW but he avoided him

    Why is it acceptable for Canelo to get a pass on fighting Lara for being in a different division for 2 fights?
    Why is it not acceptable for GGG to get a pass on fighting Ward who has been 2 divisions above him for the past 4 years?

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    813
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Nobody likes Lara, the man has no fans and there’s nobody calling for that fight (apart from you) Lara was on the run and tried to steal it but Alvarez still out landed him with his power punches 88 to 52 (In a shit fight) Jacobs outlanded Golovkin with his power shots (144 to 126)

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    584
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    Nobody likes Lara, the man has no fans and there’s nobody calling for that fight (apart from you) Lara was on the run and tried to steal it but Alvarez still out landed him with his power punches 88 to 52 (In a shit fight) Jacobs outlanded Golovkin with his power shots (144 to 126)
    I haven't called for the fight, I have asked a question as to why you don't feel that Canelo had anything to prove against him when the general consensus is that Canelo lost the fight, you came up with the excuse that they are in different divisions now and I pointed out that the remained in the same division for a few years after the initial fight.

    If GGG is avoiding Jacobs then surely the same applies to Canelo.

    Your reasoning is that Jacobs 'arguably' beat GGG well if that is the case then Lara 'arguably' beat Canelo therefore he should have had something to prove

    You can't just give a standard response of 'check the record books' to defend Canelo and not accept the exact same response for GGG

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    813
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Okay Golovkin should never fight Jacobs again, is that what you want me to say? I don’t think he ever will so don’t worry yourself nobody wants to see Lara fight Canelo because it was a shitty fight the first time. We’ll see how Lara and Trout look tonight and if either of them deserve another big fight.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,720
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Canelo would never risk a fight against Jacob's. His level at middleweight is old Cotto. He only took Triple G because he was boxed into a corner.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    627
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Quick point, I don’t think anyone has suggested Canelo beat GGG. I haven’t seen a single person say that. But then again I don’t go out looking for crazy opinions.

    Many have suggested Jacobs beat GGG.

    These are different situations. Both fighters are chasing the money. That is obvious and they are prize fighters, that should be accepted. What shouldn’t be accepted is fans getting caught up in the BS “It’s the fight for number 1 at middleweight” and such.

    Jacobs v GGG is quite clearly the fight for number 1 at middleweight. Unless GGG looks older in the rematch, Canelo clearly wins, then Canelo vs Jacobs is the fight for number 1 at Middleweight. In other words if Canelo clearly wins the rematch we will never see the fight for number 1 at middleweight because Canelo will not fight Jacobs, GGG probably won’t either. But at least maybe

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    813
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Canelo would never risk a fight against Jacob's. His level at middleweight is old Cotto. He only took Triple G because he was boxed into a corner.
    GGG won’t fight him again either so what of it Alvarez has already stepped up in weight (something GGG will never do)

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,720
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Canelo would never risk a fight against Jacob's. His level at middleweight is old Cotto. He only took Triple G because he was boxed into a corner.
    GGG won’t fight him again either so what of it Alvarez has already stepped up in weight (something GGG will never do)
    Canelo weight meant he was always a middleweight.

    GGG fought a light heavyweight Jacobs so in that sense he did fight above his weight.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    813
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    361
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Canelo would never risk a fight against Jacob's. His level at middleweight is old Cotto. He only took Triple G because he was boxed into a corner.
    GGG won’t fight him again either so what of it Alvarez has already stepped up in weight (something GGG will never do)
    Canelo weight meant he was always a middleweight.

    GGG fought a light heavyweight Jacobs so in that sense he did fight above his weight.
    You make 160 at the weigh-in then you’re a middleweight. Doesn’t matter how much weight you put on after that.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    627
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Golovkin v Alvarez rematch May 2018

    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GaMo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Canelo would never risk a fight against Jacob's. His level at middleweight is old Cotto. He only took Triple G because he was boxed into a corner.
    GGG won’t fight him again either so what of it Alvarez has already stepped up in weight (something GGG will never do)
    Canelo weight meant he was always a middleweight.

    GGG fought a light heavyweight Jacobs so in that sense he did fight above his weight.
    You make 160 at the weigh-in then you’re a middleweight. Doesn’t matter how much weight you put on after that.
    If you are familiar with Master you know the rules are valid or invalid depending on the fighter. Not on the validity of the rules.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Gennady Golovkin vs Saul Alvarez
    By GaMo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 124
    Last Post: 09-18-2017, 01:34 AM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-25-2017, 08:52 PM
  3. How Far Can Golovkin Go?
    By Boxer4life in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-22-2015, 02:11 PM
  4. Trout vs Alvarez and Macklin vs Golovkin
    By oakleyno1 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-05-2013, 10:51 PM
  5. FIFA 2018 and 2022 World Cup Host Announcement
    By killersheep in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 12-03-2010, 10:07 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing