Quality opposition--ALI is the only 1 who had it

[undefeated]

Ali was the greatest in the golden era of boxing--imagine how good he would have looked in any other era's.
BUT--if ali was in any other era--he would not get the credit--some people would even call him a bum--every1 knows ali was the most skillfull heavyweight 2 put on gloves--however would ali with the same skills--still be considered great if he had beat an old man for the title such as walcott or braddock--or if his toughest opponent was max schmeling, ezzard charles or an old larry holmes--every era--other than ali'S is basically weak. so TYSON,MARCIANO AND HOLMES. will never get the full credit they all deserve. joe louis is on the top of most people heavyweight lists, ironically his opposition was just as weak as marciano an tyson's--louis said braddock was the toughest man he faced--and braddock was an old man. louis beats an old man and he's so great, marciano and tyson do the same -so there called bums--i just dont get it, ali is the only era king--who had absolute quality opposition

[undefeated]

oops wrong forum--sob