Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: PPV numbers for Rahman Maskaev VERY poor.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    16,122
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default PPV numbers for Rahman Maskaev VERY poor.

    http://www.doghouseboxing.com/chee/chee_0823ee06.htm

    According to a report by Dan Rafael of ESPN.com, Hasim Rahman vs Oleg Maskaev did poorly. The Heavyweight bout generated a live gate of of about $1.7 million.

    The PPV numbers were very good either. Only about 60,000 pay-per-view subscriptions were sold for the event.

    Rafael reports that Promoter Bob Arum probably lost more than $1 million on the fight and the fight did so poorly that
    HBO won't be making any public announcement.

    The event cost close to $50 and those who bought it withnessed Hasim Rahman lose by 12 round TKO to Oleg Maskaev.

    Source of Information - Dan Rafael, ESPN

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1054
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: PPV numbers for Rahman Maskaev VERY poor.

    HAHAHAHAHAHA. Surprise surprise. Making this thing a PPV was the most ridiculous thing that's happened in a while. Two old, mediocre boxers battle it out for a meaningless title. What a storyline! I definitely didn't waste any money on it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: PPV numbers for Rahman Maskaev VERY poor.

    Quote Originally Posted by shza
    HAHAHAHAHAHA. Surprise surprise. Making this thing a PPV was the most ridiculous thing that's happened in a while. Two old, mediocre boxers battle it out for a meaningless title. What a storyline! I definitely didn't waste any money on it.
    It actually turned out to be a pretty good fight card though ironically.

    Humberto Soto looked fantastic against Ivan Valle, David Diaz pulled off a big comeback win over Jose Santa Cruz and the Rahman Maskaev fight itself was as recent heavyweight go a good'un.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1054
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: PPV numbers for Rahman Maskaev VERY poor.

    I watched the "main event" on the free rebroadcast and was not terribly enlivened by it. At least we got a KO, but only after almost 12 full rounds of poor showing and exhaustion from those bums. I'm glad to hear the undercard was more worthwhile.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,609
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1079
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: PPV numbers for Rahman Maskaev VERY poor.

    I aint surprised by this at all.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,669
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1056
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: PPV numbers for Rahman Maskaev VERY poor.

    Quote Originally Posted by shza
    HAHAHAHAHAHA. Surprise surprise. Making this thing a PPV was the most ridiculous thing that's happened in a while. Two old, mediocre boxers battle it out for a meaningless title. What a storyline! I definitely didn't waste any money on it.
    neither did I...and to think most of those buys were restaurants and bars....nice to see the public finally putting their collective foot down....these HW fights suck major a** and need to be put under a microscope!!!!
    It feels good to be back home.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: PPV numbers for Rahman Maskaev VERY poor.

    Quote Originally Posted by shza
    HAHAHAHAHAHA. Surprise surprise. Making this thing a PPV was the most ridiculous thing that's happened in a while. Two old, mediocre boxers battle it out for a meaningless title. What a storyline! I definitely didn't waste any money on it.
    And you what the funny thing is? Ironically Maskieav - Rahman was one of only maybe 6 heavyweight fights that were worth a shit in the last 6-7 years. LMFAO Go figure and you know why that was? because the referee would not let them hold each other ! I love Jay Nady.. That's how you Referee a Heavyweight fight, threaten to take points. He made them fight hard ! And thus gave the fans an entertaining Heavyweight bout ! Praise to Nady the best Referee in the sport !

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    124
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: PPV numbers for Rahman Maskaev VERY poor.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lords Gym
    Quote Originally Posted by shza
    HAHAHAHAHAHA. Surprise surprise. Making this thing a PPV was the most ridiculous thing that's happened in a while. Two old, mediocre boxers battle it out for a meaningless title. What a storyline! I definitely didn't waste any money on it.
    And you what the funny thing is? Ironically Maskieav - Rahman was one of only maybe 6 heavyweight fights that were worth a shit in the last 6-7 years. LMFAO Go figure and you know why that was? because the referee would not let them hold each other ! I love Jay Nady.. That's how you Referee a Heavyweight fight, threaten to take points. He made them fight hard ! And thus gave the fans an entertaining Heavyweight bout ! Praise to Nady the best Referee in the sport !
    I don't know if it was top 6 in the past 6-7 years, but I agree it was better than expected--even better than average. And I hear you on the holding instructions, but really--I didn't think Maskaev was holding on a lot of those. Corey Spinks would have another loss on his record and no title at 154 if the ref in his fight against Karmazin hadn't broken them up for "holding" every time the fighting was in close.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing