Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    I don't care if this is a rematch against a close fight, this fight isn't paperview worthy and the paperview sales should be pathetic for this fight. Morales and PacquiaoIII is paperview worthy but not this fight. BOO!!! Stupid fight, not worth a buy from paperview. Hbo scams people. I'm about to get rid of my hbo channels anyways, they show crap on hbo and the only thing I look forward on hbo is boxing. And for all the people spending money on the hbo channels, we don't even get that much boxing on hbo anymore. We get MEET THE FOCKERS replayed over and over again... No, almost every boxing fight goes on hbo paperview. Pathetic!!! Now, I know this is the part where rich people will come on to my topic and bad mouth me, even though I'm a paying customer for a shitty service called HBO that re-shows every show each hour.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    16,122
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    Each to their own I guess,most of us here think that this is one of the best cards of the year for sure! All the fights have fight of the year written all over them!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    U know what, u are certainly correct!!!!!!!!!! Not for pay per view.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    "This is no Morales and Pacquiao III"


    Even though that was kind of a given, since Pacquiao will most likely pwn morales again.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    175
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    with this stellar undercard, there is no way hbo would show this for free

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    Quote Originally Posted by TaxanBaller
    with this stellar undercard, there is no way hbo would show this for free
    THEY aren't showing it for free, I'm paying for hbo's crappy service right now. Having hbo on there channel isn't free since I'm already paying for hbo. Man, I should be illegal like every other American and get a cheater box since hbo is basically being complete pricks. So, I can watch paperview for free, not all of us are rich.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3363
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    Quote Originally Posted by marineboxer
    Quote Originally Posted by TaxanBaller
    with this stellar undercard, there is no way hbo would show this for free
    THEY aren't showing it for free, I'm paying for hbo's crappy service right now. Having hbo on there channel isn't free since I'm already paying for hbo. Man, I should be illegal like every other American and get a cheater box since hbo is basically being complete pricks. So, I can watch paperview for free, not all of us are rich.
    I get what you are saying, HBO like every every major entertainment company tries to make as much profit as they possibly can. But since when has any entetainment company tried to offer value for money?

    They all rip us off, charging £8 or more to get into a cinema to see a crappy movie, or charging us £15 to buy the same crappy movie on dvd after we've already paid to see it at the cinema.

    Now they are charging us more money to have the same crappy movie on out PSP's or portable media players, then they will charge us yet more money for the soundtrack to the same crappy movie. Then in 30 years time, they will remake the same F****** crappy movie and charge us probably £25 to watch it at the cinema, £60 to buy it on whatever digital format they have invented for us to buy from them then and again charge us for the soundtracks, etc.


    Personally I hate all of these corporatations and have pledged never to waste my money on any of their products again.

    All I can say is that filesharing is a wonderful thing, yes I like that, you want me to pay? No thanks I'll just go here and download it free, F*** you very much :P



    But and getting back on topic, this is actually one of the strongest cards of 2006. Three world title fights, potentially three tear ups.

    If I was going to spend my money on a fight card, I would definitely consider this one

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lincoln ENG
    Posts
    6,125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1275
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    Quote Originally Posted by marineboxer
    I don't care if this is a rematch against a close fight, this fight isn't paperview worthy and the paperview sales should be pathetic for this fight. Morales and PacquiaoIII is paperview worthy but not this fight. BOO!!! Stupid fight, not worth a buy from paperview. Hbo scams people. I'm about to get rid of my hbo channels anyways, they show crap on hbo and the only thing I look forward on hbo is boxing. And for all the people spending money on the hbo channels, we don't even get that much boxing on hbo anymore. We get MEET THE FOCKERS replayed over and over again... No, almost every boxing fight goes on hbo paperview. Pathetic!!! Now, I know this is the part where rich people will come on to my topic and bad mouth me, even though I'm a paying customer for a shitty service called HBO that re-shows every show each hour.
    no offense...but i dont agree with your views,
    and to be honest.... they sound a bit crazy!! :P
    this is one of the best cards this year...while i agree hbo will rip you off to make money i dont agree this is a bad card...
    theres four great fights all talented fighters facing off and i suggest that if you give it a chance you will take it all back!! but fair enough your entitled to your first opinion...but if you have hbo ( i dont!!)
    i would give it a chance....i'd be very glad if i could see the card!! so enjoy it
    peace
    Immortal Technique

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3457
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    Quote Originally Posted by bilbo
    Quote Originally Posted by marineboxer
    Quote Originally Posted by TaxanBaller
    with this stellar undercard, there is no way hbo would show this for free
    THEY aren't showing it for free, I'm paying for hbo's crappy service right now. Having hbo on there channel isn't free since I'm already paying for hbo. Man, I should be illegal like every other American and get a cheater box since hbo is basically being complete pricks. So, I can watch paperview for free, not all of us are rich.
    I get what you are saying, HBO like every every major entertainment company tries to make as much profit as they possibly can. But since when has any entetainment company tried to offer value for money?

    They all rip us off, charging £8 or more to get into a cinema to see a crappy movie, or charging us £15 to buy the same crappy movie on dvd after we've already paid to see it at the cinema.

    Now they are charging us more money to have the same crappy movie on out PSP's or portable media players, then they will charge us yet more money for the soundtrack to the same crappy movie. Then in 30 years time, they will remake the same F****** crappy movie and charge us probably £25 to watch it at the cinema, £60 to buy it on whatever digital format they have invented for us to buy from them then and again charge us for the soundtracks, etc.


    Personally I hate all of these corporatations and have pledged never to waste my money on any of their products again.

    All I can say is that filesharing is a wonderful thing, yes I like that, you want me to pay? No thanks I'll just go here and download it free, F*** you very much :P



    But and getting back on topic, this is actually one of the strongest cards of 2006. Three world title fights, potentially three tear ups.

    If I was going to spend my money on a fight card, I would definitely consider this one







    I agree about the HBO SHO movie aspect and all but....I most definatlt agree on the PPV worthy aspect of this card...Complain maybe about if it was just Barrera and Juarez but this whole card is action packed
    Hidden Content IN CASE THEY ALL FORGOT WHAT REAL HEAVYWEIGHT POWER WAS!!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3457
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    Quote Originally Posted by body head banger
    Quote Originally Posted by marineboxer
    I don't care if this is a rematch against a close fight, this fight isn't paperview worthy and the paperview sales should be pathetic for this fight. Morales and PacquiaoIII is paperview worthy but not this fight. BOO!!! Stupid fight, not worth a buy from paperview. Hbo scams people. I'm about to get rid of my hbo channels anyways, they show crap on hbo and the only thing I look forward on hbo is boxing. And for all the people spending money on the hbo channels, we don't even get that much boxing on hbo anymore. We get MEET THE FOCKERS replayed over and over again... No, almost every boxing fight goes on hbo paperview. Pathetic!!! Now, I know this is the part where rich people will come on to my topic and bad mouth me, even though I'm a paying customer for a shitty service called HBO that re-shows every show each hour.
    no offense...but i dont agree with your views,
    and to be honest.... they sound a bit crazy!! :P
    this is one of the best cards this year...while i agree hbo will rip you off to make money i dont agree this is a bad card...
    theres four great fights all talented fighters facing off and i suggest that if you give it a chance you will take it all back!! but fair enough your entitled to your first opinion...but if you have hbo ( i dont!!)
    i would give it a chance....i'd be very glad if i could see the card!! so enjoy it
    peace






    LOL I don't know what happened to the thread but you should have heard this guy going off about Lewis I think the name of the thread was So THIS IS BOXING.....
    Hidden Content IN CASE THEY ALL FORGOT WHAT REAL HEAVYWEIGHT POWER WAS!!!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lincoln ENG
    Posts
    6,125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1275
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
    Quote Originally Posted by body head banger
    Quote Originally Posted by marineboxer
    I don't care if this is a rematch against a close fight, this fight isn't paperview worthy and the paperview sales should be pathetic for this fight. Morales and PacquiaoIII is paperview worthy but not this fight. BOO!!! Stupid fight, not worth a buy from paperview. Hbo scams people. I'm about to get rid of my hbo channels anyways, they show crap on hbo and the only thing I look forward on hbo is boxing. And for all the people spending money on the hbo channels, we don't even get that much boxing on hbo anymore. We get MEET THE FOCKERS replayed over and over again... No, almost every boxing fight goes on hbo paperview. Pathetic!!! Now, I know this is the part where rich people will come on to my topic and bad mouth me, even though I'm a paying customer for a shitty service called HBO that re-shows every show each hour.
    no offense...but i dont agree with your views,
    and to be honest.... they sound a bit crazy!! :P
    this is one of the best cards this year...while i agree hbo will rip you off to make money i dont agree this is a bad card...
    theres four great fights all talented fighters facing off and i suggest that if you give it a chance you will take it all back!! but fair enough your entitled to your first opinion...but if you have hbo ( i dont!!)
    i would give it a chance....i'd be very glad if i could see the card!! so enjoy it
    peace






    LOL I don't know what happened to the thread but you should have heard this guy going off about Lewis I think the name of the thread was So THIS IS BOXING.....
    lol yeh bro i know!! crazy stuff ! :P
    i commented on that... had to be a bit harsher on that one!! lol
    lol my comment is a good ol read!! lol just dont think very much of this member to be honest...
    just been dictatiing his views and speaking out of hand without explanation or reason!! lol
    peace
    Immortal Technique

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    I just don't like cowards in boxing (aka lennox lewis)

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,190
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    Barrera vs Juarez 2 isn't PPV worthy imo, it will be a good fight but tbh I would rather see MAB fight Pacquioa again or Pacquioa fight Morales for a 3rd time. Now that's PPV worthy!
    More of a storyline behind those fights, legends fighting each other reminicent of the 80's with Duran, Hagler, Hearns and Leonard.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lincoln ENG
    Posts
    6,125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1275
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    Quote Originally Posted by marineboxer
    I just don't like cowards in boxing (aka lennox lewis)
    you are the definition of ignorance...
    you wish a terrible death on another man, who HAS earned peoples respect..
    you'll never earn my respect
    and yet i still dont wish death upon you....
    your stil a knob thoug
    Immortal Technique

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2894
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: BARRERA VS. JUAREZ II isn't paperview worthy

    I think it's up for debate that any card is worthy of PPV. But compared to all the other PPV cards this year...this one has to be the best.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing