Thread: which is the most corrupted boxing organization?

i mean theres alot of things i've heard that boxing organization are never fair?
but which ones are they and why?

All of them thats the bottom line.

Just a quick perusal of the rankings of all four major sanctioning bodies shows them all to be a farce, but the WBC with their "super" champions is probably the goofiest.

By the way, I noticed that in most rankings the champions of other organizations are left out. For example, WBA wlterweight champ Miguel Cotto is not among the WBO's top 10 contenders. Is that standard practice, or just another example of laughable incompetence?

ALL OF THEM EXCEPT THE RING!!!

b/c you have to pay to be FREAKIN CHAMPION!!!!

lol tats so gay u have to pay rofl

seems like they do anything so they can earn money

Originally Posted by Ice Man

ALL OF THEM EXCEPT THE RING!!!

b/c you have to pay to be FREAKIN CHAMPION!!!!

Originally Posted by toogood4u

lol tats so gay u have to pay rofl

seems like they do anything so they can earn money

Every sport has sanctioning fees.....Just happens in boinx they are paid by the fighter not the organization....

Do you think it is free to be an NFL franchise?....An NHL dynasty?...

A soccer Team? No

Originally Posted by LeftHookToTheBody

Just a quick perusal of the rankings of all four major sanctioning bodies shows them all to be a farce, but the WBC with their "super" champions is probably the goofiest.

By the way, I noticed that in most rankings the champions of other organizations are left out. For example, WBA wlterweight champ Miguel Cotto is not among the WBO's top 10 contenders. Is that standard practice, or just another example of laughable incompetence?

WBA is the one with the "super" champions

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

Originally Posted by LeftHookToTheBody

Just a quick perusal of the rankings of all four major sanctioning bodies shows them all to be a farce, but the WBC with their "super" champions is probably the goofiest.

By the way, I noticed that in most rankings the champions of other organizations are left out. For example, WBA wlterweight champ Miguel Cotto is not among the WBO's top 10 contenders. Is that standard practice, or just another example of laughable incompetence?

WBA is the one with the "super" champions

Yeah the WBC has the more credible interim champion....Both are stupid

As far as I'm concern, I think all of 'em.

IBF-USBA is legit. The W Organizations are more currupt.

Originally Posted by BoomBoom

IBF-USBA is legit. The W Organizations are more currupt.

I have to agree the IBF is probably the most legit....

WBC most recognized....

WBA at one time IMO was the best of the lot in fairness untill thise Super Champion crap........

You are the champ or not....There is no super champion.....

This is boxing not the Justice League

not even, didn't the IBF give Judah back his title after he lost the undisputed welterweight title to Baldomir?!?!?!

Originally Posted by DaxxKahn

Originally Posted by BoomBoom

IBF-USBA is legit. The W Organizations are more currupt.

I have to agree the IBF is probably the most legit....

As stated above in a previous post they are all corrupt.

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

not even, didn't the IBF give Judah back his title after he lost the undisputed welterweight title to Baldomir?!?!?!

Cause the IBF didn't get their share of the money so they said tho you've lost Zab heres a belt now go get us some money from PBF.
We're sure he'll pay it up.

Also let's not forget how they stripped JMM of his belt Because his fight didn't get any bids....

how are we going to judge whether a boxing organization is corrupt? that is really difficult to prove. all are perceptions which have no valid basis.if wbc, wba, wbo,ibf,etc are corrupt, why do we patronize their fights?does it mean, we tolerate corruption?if we tolerate corruption then we might be forgetting already the definition of corruption. that makes them no longer corrupt as we don't have basis for saying they are corrupt.

Originally Posted by superg

how are we going to judge whether a boxing organization is corrupt? that is really difficult to prove. all are perceptions which have no valid basis.if wbc, wba, wbo,ibf,etc are corrupt, why do we patronize their fights?does it mean, we tolerate corruption?if we tolerate corruption then we might be forgetting already the definition of corruption. that makes them no longer corrupt as we don't have basis for saying they are corrupt.

Yes they are corrupt and Yes I've learned to accept their corruptness.