Thread: Is today Heavyweight division half as poor as the division was back in the 90's?

a prime holifield was beaten my michael moorer 94
Lennox lewis was ko in 3:12 by oliver mccall in 94
And a washed up tyson was in jail in 94
Michael moorer was the no1 champion and was ko by a old fat george foreman.
This just show how poor the division was back in the 90's
holifield who look in good shape, fast, sharp and alway showing alot of heart in every fight.
Am just wondering can he beat the worst champion of the bunch as sultan ibragimov is weaker than most boxing contender out there.
Sultan ibragimov and ray austin fought one another as the fight ended a draw.
Sultan and ray austin both were given a shot at the world title
Obviously ray austin was destroy by the great klitschko in less than 4 minute as Klitschko never even needed to throw his right hand.
Sultan ibragimov beat up brigg and has probably knock brigg into retirement.

Can a legend like holyfield beat such a weak opponent like sultan ibragimov
there only 12 years difference between the fight
Foreman was over 20 year older than Michael moorer
Is today Heavyweight division half as poor as the division was back in the 90's?
We will find out OCT 13

Sultan is not a weak opponent.I don't think I need to explain this.

randy coture was 44yrs old when he beat the 32 year old no1 tim slvia UFC heavyweight champion

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

randy coture was 44yrs old when he beat the 32 year old no1 tim slvia UFC heavyweight champion

Aint this a boxing forum

some good point but I don't think sulan anywhere weak as michael moorer and holyfield nowhere good as foreman was at 50 never.
so holifield is goin to get ko

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

a prime holifield was beaten my michael moorer 94
Lennox lewis was ko in 3:12 by oliver mccall in 94
And a washed up tyson was in jail in 94
Michael moorer was the no1 champion and was ko by a old fat george foreman.
This just show how poor the division was back in the 90's
holifield who look in good shape, fast, sharp and alway showing alot of heart in every fight.
Am just wondering can he beat the worst champion of the bunch as sultan ibragimov is weaker than most boxing contender out there.
Sultan ibragimov and ray austin fought one another as the fight ended a draw.
Sultan and ray austin both were given a shot at the world title
Obviously ray austin was destroy by the great klitschko in less than 4 minute as Klitschko never even needed to throw his right hand.
Sultan ibragimov beat up brigg and has probably knock brigg into retirement.

Can a legend like holyfield beat such a weak opponent like sultan ibragimov
there only 12 years difference between the fight
Foreman was over 20 year older than Michael moorer
Is today Heavyweight division half as poor as the division was back in the 90's?
We will find out OCT 13

Riddick Bowe
Lennox Lewis
Evander Holyfield
Larry Holmes
George Foreman
Michael Moorer
Mike Tyson
David Tua
Ike Ibeabuchi
Ray Mercer
Bert Cooper
Razor Ruddock
Tommy Morrison
Frank Bruno
Andrew Golota

Your telling me 90s hws were poor ?? 90s hws put on some of the greatest hw fights ever seen and 90s era was probably 2nd strongest era of hws ever only second to 70s name me another era that was as strong as the 90s except the 70s ??

how can u say holifield who was ko by riddick bowe and few month later riddick bowe took a beatin from golata.
3 of these fighter were nobody
hav u forgot what lamon brewster done to golata
How was lennox a decent boxer when him and holifield lost against aray mercer as ray mercer was robbed.
A 44yr old larry holmes beat mercer by a bigger gap of point than a prime holifield or a prime lewis could.
larry himself was pushing age 50 in the 90's so was a actually a shadow of himself but still better than fighter like lewis and holifield which show how poor the division was.
I can't beleieve the way u have mention foreman he was also a very old person that again just show how pathetic the divison was back then especially when he beat the no1 guy.
there never ever been a time when many old people conquer the division
like holmes
foreman
bert cooper
morrison was ko by ray mercer
david tua is a nobody in 2 day heavyweight division and is just 34yrs old and that not old for 2 day heavyweight when considering oleg maskaev pushing 40 yrs old is a world champion
Also 1 year after lewis beat tua then chir byrd hammer tua.
please do not mention tyson especially after that loss in the in 1990 against a bum like douglous.
u still metion michael moroor after that shameful loss to a grandad foreman 21yrs gap in age
I couldn't mention sultan as one the great of this era even thou he ko a bum like holifield and there only a 13 year gap between the 2
this also show the high level of competition in today era

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

how can u say holifield who was ko by riddick bowe and few month later riddick bowe took a beatin from golata.
3 of these fighter were nobody
hav u forgot what lamon brewster done to golata
How was lennox a decent boxer when him and holifield lost against aray mercer as ray mercer was robbed.
A 44yr old larry holmes beat mercer by a bigger gap of point than a prime holifield or a prime lewis could.
larry himself was pushing age 50 in the 90's so was a actually a shadow of himself but still better than fighter like lewis and holifield which show how poor the division was.
I can't beleieve the way u have mention foreman he was also a very old person that again just show how pathetic the divison was back then especially when he beat the no1 guy.
there never ever been a time when many old people conquer the division
like holmes
foreman
bert cooper
morrison was ko by ray mercer
david tua is a nobody in 2 day heavyweight division and is just 34yrs old and that not old for 2 day heavyweight when considering oleg maskaev pushing 40 yrs old is a world champion
Also 1 year after lewis beat tua then chir byrd hammer tua.
please do not mention tyson especially after that loss in the in 1990 against a bum like douglous.
u still metion michael moroor after that shameful loss to a grandad foreman 21yrs gap in age
I couldn't mention sultan as one the great of this era even thou he ko a bum like holifield and there only a 13 year gap between the 2
this also show the high level of competition in today era

All your doing is finding every fault and you still didn't answer my question when i said what was stronger era than 90s except 70s.

To be honest every part of your post is wrong i can't really be bothered because i know who you are and i doubt you will last long here im guessing your the ronnie guy.

ike beauchi was a great fighter but never got a chance to proove it since he wen to jail

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

ike beauchi was a great fighter but never got a chance to proove it since he wen to jail

if I have said that the 90 era was the poorest ever and gave evidence and still refuse the truth then wha else can i do
and by the way the ronnie guy

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

ike beauchi was a great fighter but never got a chance to proove it since he wen to jail

if I have said that the 90 era was the poorest ever and gave evidence and still refuse the truth then wha else can i do
and by the way the ronnie guy

Um you didn't tell me this is 3rd time i have asked now what era was stronger than the 90s except 70s because if you consider 90s poor what other era was stronger except the 70s.

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

how can u say holifield who was ko by riddick bowe and few month later riddick bowe took a beatin from golata.
3 of these fighter were nobody
hav u forgot what lamon brewster done to golata
How was lennox a decent boxer when him and holifield lost against aray mercer as ray mercer was robbed.
A 44yr old larry holmes beat mercer by a bigger gap of point than a prime holifield or a prime lewis could.
larry himself was pushing age 50 in the 90's so was a actually a shadow of himself but still better than fighter like lewis and holifield which show how poor the division was.
I can't beleieve the way u have mention foreman he was also a very old person that again just show how pathetic the divison was back then especially when he beat the no1 guy.
there never ever been a time when many old people conquer the division
like holmes
foreman
bert cooper
morrison was ko by ray mercer
david tua is a nobody in 2 day heavyweight division and is just 34yrs old and that not old for 2 day heavyweight when considering oleg maskaev pushing 40 yrs old is a world champion
Also 1 year after lewis beat tua then chir byrd hammer tua.
please do not mention tyson especially after that loss in the in 1990 against a bum like douglous.
u still metion michael moroor after that shameful loss to a grandad foreman 21yrs gap in age
I couldn't mention sultan as one the great of this era even thou he ko a bum like holifield and there only a 13 year gap between the 2
this also show the high level of competition in today era

All your doing is finding every fault and you still didn't answer my question when i said what was stronger era than 90s except 70s.

To be honest every part of your post is wrong i can't really be bothered because i know who you are and i doubt you will last long here im guessing your the ronnie guy.

if I have said that the 90 era was the poorest ever and gave evidence and you still refuse the truth then wha else can i do
and by the way who the ronnie guy
because it seem like ur threatin me by sayin i won't last here very long

anymore threat and i'll complain about u

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

how can u say holifield who was ko by riddick bowe and few month later riddick bowe took a beatin from golata.
3 of these fighter were nobody
hav u forgot what lamon brewster done to golata
How was lennox a decent boxer when him and holifield lost against aray mercer as ray mercer was robbed.
A 44yr old larry holmes beat mercer by a bigger gap of point than a prime holifield or a prime lewis could.
larry himself was pushing age 50 in the 90's so was a actually a shadow of himself but still better than fighter like lewis and holifield which show how poor the division was.
I can't beleieve the way u have mention foreman he was also a very old person that again just show how pathetic the divison was back then especially when he beat the no1 guy.
there never ever been a time when many old people conquer the division
like holmes
foreman
bert cooper
morrison was ko by ray mercer
david tua is a nobody in 2 day heavyweight division and is just 34yrs old and that not old for 2 day heavyweight when considering oleg maskaev pushing 40 yrs old is a world champion
Also 1 year after lewis beat tua then chir byrd hammer tua.
please do not mention tyson especially after that loss in the in 1990 against a bum like douglous.
u still metion michael moroor after that shameful loss to a grandad foreman 21yrs gap in age
I couldn't mention sultan as one the great of this era even thou he ko a bum like holifield and there only a 13 year gap between the 2
this also show the high level of competition in today era

All your doing is finding every fault and you still didn't answer my question when i said what was stronger era than 90s except 70s.

To be honest every part of your post is wrong i can't really be bothered because i know who you are and i doubt you will last long here im guessing your the ronnie guy.

if I have said that the 90 era was the poorest ever and gave evidence and you still refuse the truth then wha else can i do
and by the way who the ronnie guy
because it seem like ur threatin me by sayin i won't last here very long

anymore threat and i'll complain about u

Report me i couldn't careless you sound very similar to a member who has been banned here if i got it wrong i apologize but you are stating your opinion and claiming it is the truth when it isn't i have asked for 4th time for you to tell me what other era was stronger than 90s and what other era had same quality fighters as Bowe Lewis Holyfield.

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

ike beauchi was a great fighter but never got a chance to proove it since he wen to jail

if I have said that the 90 era was the poorest ever and gave evidence and still refuse the truth then wha else can i do
and by the way the ronnie guy

Um you didn't tell me this is 3rd time i have asked now what era was stronger than the 90s except 70s because if you consider 90s poor what other era was stronger except the 70s.

I'll explain the easy way

every era was stronger than the 90 era
and to use the word strong and the 90 era
Is the most mis-match sentence anyone ever could use
so congratulation a accomplish is a accomplish

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Originally Posted by ThegreatJoelouis

how can u say holifield who was ko by riddick bowe and few month later riddick bowe took a beatin from golata.
3 of these fighter were nobody
hav u forgot what lamon brewster done to golata
How was lennox a decent boxer when him and holifield lost against aray mercer as ray mercer was robbed.
A 44yr old larry holmes beat mercer by a bigger gap of point than a prime holifield or a prime lewis could.
larry himself was pushing age 50 in the 90's so was a actually a shadow of himself but still better than fighter like lewis and holifield which show how poor the division was.
I can't beleieve the way u have mention foreman he was also a very old person that again just show how pathetic the divison was back then especially when he beat the no1 guy.
there never ever been a time when many old people conquer the division
like holmes
foreman
bert cooper
morrison was ko by ray mercer
david tua is a nobody in 2 day heavyweight division and is just 34yrs old and that not old for 2 day heavyweight when considering oleg maskaev pushing 40 yrs old is a world champion
Also 1 year after lewis beat tua then chir byrd hammer tua.
please do not mention tyson especially after that loss in the in 1990 against a bum like douglous.
u still metion michael moroor after that shameful loss to a grandad foreman 21yrs gap in age
I couldn't mention sultan as one the great of this era even thou he ko a bum like holifield and there only a 13 year gap between the 2
this also show the high level of competition in today era

All your doing is finding every fault and you still didn't answer my question when i said what was stronger era than 90s except 70s.

To be honest every part of your post is wrong i can't really be bothered because i know who you are and i doubt you will last long here im guessing your the ronnie guy.

if I have said that the 90 era was the poorest ever and gave evidence and you still refuse the truth then wha else can i do
and by the way who the ronnie guy
because it seem like ur threatin me by sayin i won't last here very long

anymore threat and i'll complain about u

Report me i couldn't careless you sound very similar to a member who has been banned here if i got it wrong i apologize but you are stating your opinion and claiming it is the truth when it isn't i have asked for 4th time for you to tell me what other era was stronger than 90s and what other era had same quality fighters as Bowe Lewis Holyfield.

hey look it cool
I mis understood you as much as you mis understood me